AW: server-to-server copy-pools
2002-06-05 02:07:17
Thanks,
an additional question before setting up the configuration :
second copy-pool with same device-class means that the data physically go to
the same tape-pool on the other server, because it works with the default
management-class for that server ( where the pool name is defined). Is this
correct ?
So the only additional config to make (beneath defining the second
copy-pool) is increasing the 'mount limit' in device-class 'server' on the
one side where copy-pool is defined to the number of copy-pools I define ?
Thanks
Christoph
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [SMTP:acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET]
> Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2002 07:47
> An: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Betreff: Re: server-to-server copy-pools
>
> Other server is related not to copy pool but to the device class. You have
> only to define second pool over same devclass.
>
> Zlatko Krastev
> IT Consultant
>
>
>
>
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> cc:
>
> Subject: server-to-server copy-pools
>
> Hi all,
>
> today we have two servers connected via server-to-server. Both server have
> defined their copy-pool on the other server.
> I would like to split the copy-pool into two different ones. Reason is to
> run stg-pool-backups in more than one session parallel..
> Does anybody know, if this is possible and how I can set up two different
> copypools on a server, that are accessed via server-to-server connection
> from one other server.
>
> Thanks for any help
>
> Christoph
|
|
|