In our experience, ADSM always re-writes the volume label on tapes when it
re-uses it; I worked on a problem with ADIC Scalar library containing DLT
drives, where ADSM failed to use properly activate compression, but
consistently set the drive to low-density for writing the label... when we
set the DIP switches to force compression ON, ADSM would core.
Don France
Technical Architect - Unix Engineering/P.A.C.E.
San Jose, CA
mailto:dfrance AT pacbell DOT net
PACE - http://www.pacepros.com
Bus-Ph: (408) 257-3037
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Zarnowski [mailto:vkm AT CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL DOT EDU]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 12:18 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: DLT Drive Upgrade
At 02:35 PM 11/1/2000 -0500, Palmadesso Jack wrote:
>This library is also single-ended not differential. I am not a SCSI expert
>so I am wondering why you would not just leave the library in single-ended
>mode instead of changing all of its guts to work with differential. What
is
>the gain other than the distance you can run your cable? Breece Hill still
>offers both models and I was planning on staying single-ended. Although I
>am always open to changes for the better:)
You should check with Breece Hill, or whoever you would purchase the
upgrade from. As I recall (and this was several years ago!), the reason
that the library had to be upgraded is that the library communicates with
the drives in some way that required something other than just the drives
to be upgraded. All I know is that when we purchased the library with
DLT4000 drives, I had the idea in the back of my mind that we could someday
upgrade the drives to increase the capacity of the library, but when it
came time to actually do this, it did not pan out like I thought it would.
> From what I am getting about the new media is that first I need to define
a
>new device class and specify "drives" for the format to get the maximum
>capacity out of the media. Also that data written on filling tapes will
>remain in the same format which makes sense. Only data written on new
>scratch tapes would benefit from the new drives writing format. That also
>make alot of sense.
>
>Assuming that there is no problem reading the media what confuses me a
>little is why I would want to define a new device class. In the current
>environment the device class is "DLT" and the format is set to "drives."
>Those are the only 2 that really matter, correct? As long as I associate
>the new drives to that device class I should not have to create any new
>device classes. I could just use the existing class and let the drives do
>the translations from one format to the next. Am I being too simple?
No, I think you are correct. I think you should be able to continue using
your DLT device class if the format is set to "drive". Y
You don't actually associate drives with a device class. Rather, you
associate a device class with a library (which contains those drives).
One other thing that I'm not clear about, but perhaps someone else on the
list could comment on, is whether you need to re-label tapes to get them
written in the higher density, or if this happens automatically after a
tape is reclaimed.
>Jack
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul Zarnowski [mailto:vkm AT CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL DOT EDU]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 2:16 PM
>To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>Subject: Re: DLT Drive Upgrade
>
>
>Jack,
> We also have a Breece Hill Q47 with 3 DLT4000 drives. It is no longer
>our primary robot, but it used to be. It is true that a DLT7000 or DLT8000
>drive should be able to read tapes written by a DLT4000 drive. I *think*
>it is true that ADSM will read these tapes also, but I do not have
>first-hand experience on that. New tapes that are written will be written
>according to the format specified in the device class. Check the
>documentation on DEFINE DEVCLASS for more info - look for the section on
>DLT drives.
>
> However - the main reason I am responding is the following. When we
>looked into upgrading our Q47 to DLT7000, we found that financially it did
>not make sense. This is because our robot, and drives, were not
>differential SCSI. In order to upgrade to DLT7000 drives, we would not
>only have had to replace the drives, but we would have had to upgrade the
>library itself to be differential SCSI. The cost of this made it
>financially not worth doing. Instead, we opted to purchase a new larger
>tape library. I would look into whether your library is differential
>already or not, and whether you would also run into this issue or
>not. Your library may indeed be differential. I think the reason that
>ours was not, was because we purchased it before Breece Hill offered a
>differential version of the library.
>
> I believe that new data written to an existing tape, will be written in
>the format that is already on that tape. I believe that only newly written
>tapes will be written at the higher density, and then only if you have the
>device class defined properly.
>
>..Paul
>--
>At 02:02 PM 11/1/2000 -0500, Palmadesso Jack wrote:
> > One of my libraries is getting close to maxing out its storage. Its a
> >Breece Hill Q47 with 3 DLT4000 drives. I'd like to replace the drives
with
> >4 DLT8000 drives. So far I've been hearing it should all be backward
> >compatible but mostly thats just from the sales people. Some of the
people
> >around here think a DLT4000 tape should be readable in 7000 or 8000
drive.
> >Is this correct?
> >
> >If it is correct then is it possible to just replace the drives in the
> >library redefine them to AIX and ADSM and continue on? In other words
will
> >ADSM even notice? We are running ADSM 3.1.2 L40 on an RS/6000.
> >
> >I am thinking it should be fine but I am mainly wondering how new data
gets
> >written back out to media? Will new data being written to tape need to
> >write on a scratch volume or can it just be written on a filling volume?
>Or
> >is all of this too much of a hassle and I should just buy a new library
and
> >migrate the data over to it? Is there any sort of procedure defined
> >someplace I could use?
> >
> >Thanks for any input
> >Jack
|
