I have two ADSM servers on NT one at 3.1.2.20 has been at that level since 
introduced and is very stable. The new server is attached to a 3494 with 3590e 
drives so I'm using 3.1.2.50 and so far have not had any problems. I say so far 
since this server has only been on line for a month and has only a few clients. 
I did find expiration to be slow on the 20 release but wonder about the actual 
hardware limitations of the system it is on.




ossinger AT WSU DOT EDU on 01/05/2000 01:15:47 PM
Please respond to ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU@NetTalk
To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU@NetTalk
cc:
bcc:

Subject:        Re: ADSM 3.1.2.50

At 09:24 AM 1/5/00 -0600, Nathan King wrote:
>-snip
>We also have 2 ADSM Servers at 3.1.2.20 which have been very stable indeed.
>If I were downlevel at this time and was looking for a stable ptf I would go
>for 3.1.2.20. Unless ofcourse you require some of the fixes included in
>3.1.2.40 and upwards e.g. 3590 E support.

We are also looking to upgrade to a stable (pre-tsm) level of ADSM.  Is
there any consensus out there that earlier than 2.50 might be the best
place to be?  Thanx.

(Server is ADSM 3.1.2.1, AIX 4.2 (soon 4.3) on an RS/6000 7025/F40 box
attached to a Magstar 3575 L24 tape library.)


====================================================================
Bo R. Ossinger                 phone: 509-335-0920
Washington State University    fax:   509-335-6635,,,50920
Information Technology         mailto:ossinger AT wsu DOT edu
Production Support Systems     http://www.wsu.edu/prod_supp/Pss.html
PO Box 641222
Pullman, WA  99164-1222
====================================================================