Re: Backup Throughput
1999-03-11 12:16:07
What about mirroring/splitting or using a JFS file system enabling
logging/snapshots?
What you are requesting is a bit to vague. It depends on the FS
distribution, how many files in every directory ... for all I know is
that 3575 is about 7 MB/sec (native) in the new flavour of device. 3590
is about 9 MB/sec (native) and it'll be 15 MB/sec (native) in Q3 this
year.
Ciao Mauro
> Sorry if this has been asked before.
>
> What is the "typical" MB/hr backup rates that can be achieved by an
> ADSM/Magstar type combination ? I realize that there are many factors
> to consider including server speed, network speed, etc. Does anyone
> have a connection/equipment combination that has an exceptionally high
> rate ? I have some very small windows available to backup some 600-1G
> of changed data each day.
> Many thanks,
> RH
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Backup Throughput, rh
- Re: Backup Throughput,
Mauro M. Tinelli <=
- Re: Backup Throughput, John Fowler
- Re: Backup Throughput, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: Backup Throughput, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
- Re: Backup Throughput, Armstrong, Stanley
- Backup Throughput, rh [mailto:rh_info_store
- Re: Backup Throughput, John Fowler
- Backup Throughput, rh [mailto:rh_info_store
|
|
|