ADSM-L

Re: CA-1 & ADSM/MVS

1998-03-27 11:08:33
Subject: Re: CA-1 & ADSM/MVS
From: "Nichols, Linnea" <lnichols AT FFXEX01.CO.FAIRFAX.VA DOT US>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 11:08:33 -0500
One more thing, and I don't know if I'm really doing it correctly
or not, but we run MOVE DRMEDIA commands to move tapes
offsite/onsite with ADSM right before we run the CA1 Vault
Management system job.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DeMamiel, Laurie L.R. [SMTP:Laurie.DeMamiel AT WOODSIDE.COM DOT AU]
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 1998 7:05 PM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      Re: CA-1 & ADSM/MVS
>
> We created a different device class for carts that will be required to
> be send offsite ie  copy stgpool volumes . Our primary stgpool carts
> have a dsn of DSMP.BFC.BFS or DSMP.BFS ( the first is 3590 the second
> is
> 3490) and our copy volumes are DSMP.CPY.BFS, plus we use other device
> classes for archive. This way we use a vault pattern with  CA1 to
> manage
> our ATL and movement of carts to and from offsite storage.
>
> Regards
> Laurie de Mamiel
> Woodside Offshore Petroleum.
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Field, Anthony [SMTP:Anthony.Field AT CENTRELINK.GOV DOT AU]
> > Sent: Friday, March 27, 1998 9:19 AM
> > To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject:      CA-1 & ADSM/MVS
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We are setting up ADSM & I am having trouble working out how to
> handle
> > offsite tapes with ADSM & CA-1. We have DRM available for us to use
> > also.
> > What procedures do you use to tell CA-1 that a volser is eligible to
> > be
> > taken offsite as CA-1 appears to filter by dataset name but ADSM is
> > more
> > volser orientated.
> >
> > Tony
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>