ADSM-L

Performance of dsmlabel

1996-10-24 11:59:30
Subject: Performance of dsmlabel
From: Tom Denier <tom AT STAFF.UDC.UPENN DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 11:59:30 -0400
My site has recently set up a test ADSM Version 2 server using 8mm tape
drives (our Version 1 production server uses 3490 cartridges). I used
the dsmlabel program to label some 8mm volumes. It took about two and
a half minutes per volume. Is this normal performance?
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>