- 21. Re: Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Hynes <andrewhynes AT CHUBB DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 17:56:17 +0000
- Have you tried defining them as ADSM devices (thru smit option if I remember correctly) - I think that was how I did it but it wa 2 years ago and I've not got a manual !!! Andy Shekhar Dhotre <Shekha
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-11/msg00935.html (21,341 bytes)
- 22. Re: Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: "Joshua S. Bassi" <jbassi AT IHWY DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 10:21:51 -0800
- chdev -l rmtX -- Joshua S. Bassi Joshua S. Bassi IBM Certified- AIX Support, HACMP, SAN Enterprise Disk(Shark)& Tape Solutions Tivoli Certified Consultant - ADSM/TSM jbassi AT ihwy DOT com
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-11/msg00938.html (11,808 bytes)
- 23. Re: Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
- Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:26:32 -0500
- Hi rebooted the AIX box , now rmt1 and rmt2 are available and mt0 and mt1 defined , how to make them available ? tried adding throgh smit -Tivoli storage manager -tape gives following error. gives fo
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-11/msg00939.html (20,292 bytes)
- 24. Re: Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: James Thompson <mezron AT HOTMAIL DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:30:40 MST
- The odm definitions changed from 3.7.2 to 3.7.3 and above. Instead of showing up as tape they are now defined adsmtape. You should remove the old mtX definitions with the command rmdev -dR mtX Do thi
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-11/msg00940.html (21,731 bytes)
- 25. Re: Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: Shekhar Dhotre <Shekhar.Dhotre.B AT BAYER DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 13:37:17 -0500
- medrs2:lsdev -Cc tape lsdev: 0514-521 Cannot find information in the predefined device configuration database for the customized device mt0. lsdev: 0514-521 Cannot find information in the predefined
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-11/msg00941.html (12,795 bytes)
- 26. Re: Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: Shekhar Dhotre <Shekhar.Dhotre.B AT BAYER DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 15:44:36 -0500
- Today its not my day , now i just solved mt0, mt1 problem Using folllowing commands , and reconfigured them through smit-tivoli-stotage manger devices -tapes .. everything worked fine and all problem
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-11/msg00950.html (14,111 bytes)
- 27. Re: Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: Joel Fuhrman <joelf AT CAC.WASHINGTON DOT EDU>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 16:51:38 -0800
- Do you have "tivoli.tsm.devices.acsls" installed? If yes, did you define the drives using "smit adsmtape"?
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-11/msg00960.html (14,156 bytes)
- 28. Re: Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: Shekhar Dhotre <Shekhar.Dhotre.B AT BAYER DOT COM>
- Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 11:57:05 -0500
- Richard , my problem is solved , deleted odm entries by command and reconfigured /rebooted server , Now everything is under control and fine , all filesets are installed .thanks for your help . medrs
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-11/msg00968.html (15,117 bytes)
- 29. UPGRADE (score: 1)
- Author: Mpho Makhura <mmakhura AT FGH.CO DOT ZA>
- Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 15:34:56 +0200
- Hi ADSMERS, I am busy upgrading an AIX 4.2.1 server from adsm v2.1.... to v3.1.After the upgrade I having a problem with application of the ptf's.There is an error for missing requisite and this miss
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-05/msg01524.html (10,013 bytes)
- 30. Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: "DeKlein, Fred" <Fred.DeKlein AT CAPGEMINI.CO DOT UK>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 14:15:03 +0100
- Hello All, I have been on the ADSM List for a couple of weeks now, and am absolutely flabbergasted with the amount of problems that seem to be occurring with our precious little ADSM. We have to upgr
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-10/msg00511.html (10,691 bytes)
- 31. Re: Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: "Jones, Anthony" <Jones4A AT KOCHIND DOT COM>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 08:47:03 -0500
- I just upgraded 3 weeks ago. The upgrade was painless. There are some things you want to keep in mind. 1. You need to remove the old software first. I made 2 db backups, just to be safe. 2. The lates
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-10/msg00515.html (12,029 bytes)
- 32. Re: Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: Nicholas Cassimatis <nickpc AT US.IBM DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 14:03:11 -0400
- Fred, My upgrade from 2.1.1.18 (do I have that right, it was PTF 18) to 3.1.1.5 went perfectly. I had no problems at all. I even got done in less than half the time I had set aside for the upgrade. M
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-10/msg00635.html (10,849 bytes)
- 33. Re: Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: Stephane Zucchini <zucchins AT FR.IBM DOT COM>
- Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 18:44:53 +0000
- Status Distribution October 16, 1998 18:42:20 The message regarding "Re: Upgrade" sent on October 16, 1998 18:42:20 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Native Name ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU Foreig
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-10/msg00668.html (10,952 bytes)
- 34. Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: Bill King <bill AT NSMC.PARTNERS DOT ORG>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 10:54:00 -0500
- Hi all, I have adstar for os/2 v1.x. I have a netware 4.1 file server that is being replaced with new hardware. I want to keep a consistent set of netware system directories (system, mail, public etc
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-09/msg00706.html (10,601 bytes)
- 35. Re: Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: "Robinson, Cris" <Cris.Robinson AT LIBERTYMUTUAL DOT COM>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 12:04:02 -0400
- Hi Bill In your DSM.OPT file in the ADSM directory you can add the following EXCLUDE SERVERNAME/SYS:SYSTEM\...\* EXCLUDE SERVERBANE/SYS:PUBLIC\...\* EXCLUDE SERVERBANE/SYS:MAIL\...\* Replace the \...
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-09/msg00710.html (11,976 bytes)
- 36. Re: Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: Bill King <bill AT NSMC.PARTNERS DOT ORG>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 13:11:00 -0500
- Thank you for the response.... Are you saying that when I perform a restore, the dsm.opt file is used to exclude files to be restored as well as excluding files to be backed up? I know the dsm.opt f
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-09/msg00713.html (13,040 bytes)
- 37. Re: Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: Pieter Groen <Pieter.Groen AT UCI.KUN DOT NL>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 14:31:08 +0200
- I do NOT believe this is true! Is it? Greetings, Pieter
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-09/msg00726.html (10,700 bytes)
- 38. Re: Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: "Robinson, Cris" <Cris.Robinson AT LIBERTYMUTUAL DOT COM>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 08:50:04 -0400
- Guess I misunderstood the question Bill, but here is another route to take - When you do a restore use the following option: REPLACE=NO ( this will stop ADSM from overwriting any existing files ) All
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-09/msg00729.html (11,688 bytes)
- 39. Re: Upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: Bill King <bill AT NSMC.PARTNERS DOT ORG>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 09:53:00 -0500
- It is an option..... It is however not a good one. I need to keep the existing novell system directories in tact with no other older nlm's, renamed nlm's etc. I have had many problems mixing and mat
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-09/msg00733.html (12,510 bytes)
- 40. UPGRADE (score: 1)
- Author: Bill King <bill AT NSMC.PARTNERS DOT ORG>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 07:52:00 -0500
- Hi All, I have adstar version 2 that runs on os/2. I have recently upgraded a netware 3 server to netware 4. The netware 3 server has been backing up fine for months. Are the only changes I need to m
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-07/msg00002.html (10,166 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu