Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TDP\s+for\s+ERP\s+$SAP\s+R\/3\s+on\s+Oracle$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TDP\s+for\s+ERP\s+$SAP\s+R\/3\s+on\s+Oracle$\s*$/: 165981 ]

Total 165981 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM for VE 7.1.2.0 data vs meta question (score: 1): Author: Michael Prix <mp AT RS6000.DARKTECH DOT ORG>; Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 15:58:20 +0200; Steve, if it's really a pool on a VTL, then there are no major implications for you. The reason the metadata should stay on disk is that the metadata is needed for CBT to detect the blocks needed to; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00057.html (12,389 bytes)
82. [ADSM-L] Version 7.1.3 (score: 1): Author: Robert Ouzen <rouzen AT UNIV.HAIFA.AC DOT IL>; Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 10:58:54 +0000; Hello All I wonder if people , already upgrade to version 7.1.3 and have comments , appreciation . I understand that its a new big concept as STG container for inline dedup. Anyone use it ? and can s; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00058.html (10,632 bytes)
83. [ADSM-L] Client for Windows 10 (score: 1): Author: Roger Deschner <rogerd AT UIC DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:47:48 -0500; We are starting to get requests for a TSM client to back up Windows 10. I've been testing V7.1.3 on a 64-bit Windows 10 test machine which *appears* to work. With Microsoft pushing Windows 10 upgrade; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00059.html (11,039 bytes)
84. Re: [ADSM-L] Client for Windows 10 (score: 1): Author: "J. Pohlmann" <jpohlmann AT SHAW DOT CA>; Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:32:04 -0700; I haven't seen a support statement. Here is my experience (sample of 1 - use your judgement). My 7.1.2 clients survived the upgrade to Windows 10 just fine. I have upgraded one Windows 10 client to 7; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00060.html (12,150 bytes)
85. Re: [ADSM-L] Version 7.1.3 (score: 1): Author: "J. Pohlmann" <jpohlmann AT SHAW DOT CA>; Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:44:30 -0700; So far only in a lab environment. Found that, when using directory container storage pools, only node type=client data works. For my node type=server, the attempt to store data in the directory conta; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00061.html (11,964 bytes)
86. [ADSM-L] trouble with archive log not emptying (score: 1): Author: "Lee, Gary" <glee AT BSU DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 19:21:32 +0000; Tsm server 6.3.4 under RHEL 6.5. Getting continuous activations of a full db backup, apparently because the archive log is not getting emptied. What is the best way to trace this down? I have forced; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00062.html (11,064 bytes)
87. Re: [ADSM-L] trouble with archive log not emptying (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:48:55 -0400; Have you checked for large, long running sessions/backups that are holding the logs? We have seen this with TDP style backups getting stuck/not finishing. -- *Zoltan Forray* TSM Software & Hardware A; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00063.html (12,118 bytes)
88. Re: [ADSM-L] trouble with archive log not emptying (score: 1): Author: "Lee, Gary" <glee AT BSU DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 19:52:34 +0000; Currently, no long running backup sessions at all. Have you checked for large, long running sessions/backups that are holding the logs? We have seen this with TDP style backups getting stuck/not fini; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00064.html (12,569 bytes)
89. [ADSM-L] archive log won't empty (score: 1): Author: "Lee, Gary" <glee AT BSU DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 20:21:40 +0000; Forced another full db backup, this time archive log emptied. Log mirror hasn't emptied, but not to concerned about that. Thanks all.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00065.html (10,236 bytes)
90. Re: [ADSM-L] A few questions about Node Replication (score: 1): Author: "Meunier, Yann" <yann.meunier AT CAISSEDESDEPOTS DOT FR>; Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 06:24:36 +0000; Hi, No answer for my questions? Best regards, Yann MEUNIER Ingénierie - Système Stockage Informatique CDC - Etablissement DPI Office : +33 1 58 50 53 01 Mobile : +33 6 62 47 88 56 De : Meunier, Yann; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00066.html (15,310 bytes)
91. Re: [ADSM-L] A few questions about Node Replication (score: 1): Author: "Meunier, Yann" <yann.meunier AT CAISSEDESDEPOTS DOT FR>; Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 07:46:25 +0000; Hi, Sorry I did not see your answers :( Erwann thank you! :) Best regards, Yann MEUNIER Ingénierie - Système Stockage Informatique CDC - Etablissement DPI Office : +33 1 58 50 53 01 Mobile : +33 6 62; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00067.html (15,814 bytes)
92. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools (score: 1): Author: Deirdre O'Callaghan <DEIRDREC AT IE.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:09:06 +0100; Thank you for your feedback and questions about directory-container storage pools. For more information about frequently asked questions in relation to directory-container storage pools, see the foll; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00068.html (12,375 bytes)
93. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools (score: 1): Author: "Ryder, Michael S" <michael_s.ryder AT ROCHE DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:18:08 -0400; Thank you Deirdre I'm providing this excerpt from FAQ below -- please tell me this is going to be streamlined in the future? (If so, how much longer?) This is a LOT of data movement in order to simpl; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00069.html (15,033 bytes)
94. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools (score: 1): Author: Stefan Folkerts <stefan.folkerts AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 10:20:34 +0200; Okay, so the move data command did not make it into 7.1.3, it is currently worked on and will become available some time in the future. IBM talked about this at lenght at the TSM Symposium in Dresden; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00070.html (17,363 bytes)
95. Re: [ADSM-L] A few questions about Node Replication (score: 1): Author: Stefan Folkerts <stefan.folkerts AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 13:16:33 +0200; I don't think you can setup replication on one server definition but have the client failover work on another server definition. And no, you can't control bandwith for replication from TSM, if you ar; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00071.html (17,049 bytes)
96. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM for VE 7.1.2.0 data vs meta question (score: 1): Author: Stefan Folkerts <stefan.folkerts AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 13:21:09 +0200; You might want to look into making some full VM backups for the most important vn's to get the relevant metadata to disk asap. I see to many people putting metadata on tape and using incremental fore; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00072.html (13,347 bytes)
97. Re: [ADSM-L] Client for Windows 10 (score: 1): Author: Roger Deschner <rogerd AT UIC DOT EDU>; Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 13:51:27 -0500; I did not encounter the two-step install. I installed 64-bit Windows 10 from a DVD onto bare metal. Then I installed TSM Client V7.1.3 which was only a one-step process. It appears to work, but I'm n; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00073.html (12,984 bytes)
98. [ADSM-L] 7.1.3 Decomm changes (score: 1): Author: Steven Harris <steve AT STEVENHARRIS DOT INFO>; Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:09:49 +1000; Hi All Kudos to the TSM developers for the new decomm facilities in 7.1.3. I put up an RFE once myself for something similar. As I read it, the decommissioned data is locked up in such a way that it; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00074.html (11,174 bytes)
99. Re: [ADSM-L] 7.1.3 Decomm changes (score: 1): Author: "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 09:37:44 +0000; Hi Steve! I agree things are a bit unclear here. On her presentation on YouTube Tricia Jiang explicitly states that the decommission command locks the node and that it cannot be unlocked (https://www; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00075.html (13,272 bytes)
100. Re: [ADSM-L] 7.1.3 Decomm changes (score: 1): Author: Remco Post <r.post AT PLCS DOT NL>; Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:57:09 +0200; Hi all, a decomm with a countdown without options to reverse te decomm seems quite useless indeed. So either development sort of missed the point or the communications around this new feature are not; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00076.html (14,454 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]