Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TDP\s+for\s+ERP\s+$SAP\s+R\/3\s+on\s+Oracle$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TDP\s+for\s+ERP\s+$SAP\s+R\/3\s+on\s+Oracle$\s*$/: 165981 ]

Total 165981 documents matching your query.

341. [ADSM-L] server out of storage space when really not missing vmware backups (score: 1): Author: "Lee, Gary" <glee AT BSU DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 14:32:04 +0000; Tsm server 6.2.5 TDP for vmware 6.4 I have the vmware data pool defined as a sequencial file pool, to facilitate migration. However, last night the server claimed it was out of data storage space, bu; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00021.html (11,749 bytes)
342. [ADSM-L] User VHD? (score: 1): Author: Remco Post <r.post AT PLCS DOT NL>; Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 18:07:05 +0200; Hi all, one of my customers has decided to implement User virtual harddisks on his windows terminal server. All very well, but I only have 2 problems: - for some reason TSM insists on making a back-u; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00022.html (10,967 bytes)
343. Re: [ADSM-L] server out of storage space when really not missing vmware backups (score: 1): Author: David Ehresman <david.ehresman AT LOUISVILLE DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 16:07:15 +0000; Maxscratch defines how many scratch volumes you can have in a storagepool. When you reach maxscratch, assuming you do not have volumes predefined, you are by definition out of data storage space rega; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00023.html (12,536 bytes)
344. Re: [ADSM-L] server out of storage space when really not missing vmware backups (score: 1): Author: "Lee, Gary" <glee AT BSU DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 17:15:04 +0000; My question here is that 59 out of 195 volumes in the pool are less than 75% utilized. Shouldn't tsm fil them before declaring itself out of space? --Original Message-- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00024.html (13,136 bytes)
345. Re: [ADSM-L] server out of storage space when really not missing vmware backups (score: 1): Author: white jeff <jeff.white3 AT BLUEYONDER.CO DOT UK>; Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 18:38:29 +0100; Gary That depends on the volume status. If FILLING, then it is eligible to be written to. Example a volume in FILLING status which is 75% utilised has 25% free space. Therefore a candidate for wring; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00025.html (14,677 bytes)
346. Re: [ADSM-L] server out of storage space when really not missing vmware backups (score: 1): Author: Shawn DREW <shawn.drew AT US.BNPPARIBAS DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 17:47:12 +0000; Assuming it is in a filling state, check out the "Filling" section here to see why a filling tape might not be used http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts Gary That depends on the volume status. If; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00026.html (16,575 bytes)
347. Re: [ADSM-L] server out of storage space when really not missing vmware backups (score: 1): Author: "Lee, Gary" <glee AT BSU DOT EDU>; Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 17:58:21 +0000; That was it, forgot status. Fixing now. --Original Message-- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of white jeff Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 1:38 PM To: ADSM-L; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00027.html (15,015 bytes)
348. [ADSM-L] "Ghost" Tape Drives and Slots (score: 1): Author: Benjamin Balk <bbalk AT UMICH DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 08:58:06 -0400; Hello, We have a couple of aging TS3500/3584 tape libraries and are going through a process of consolidating what hardware we can into one single library using our faster drives and newer tapes. Duri; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00028.html (11,661 bytes)
349. Re: [ADSM-L] "Ghost" Tape Drives and Slots (score: 1): Author: "Reese, Michael A (Mike) CIV USARMY 93 SIG BDE (US)" <michael.a.reese62.civ AT MAIL DOT MIL>; Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 13:13:26 +0000; We ran into exactly the same issue with our TS3500 tape library a few years ago. Unfortunately, the tech had to pull the drives and put the empty slots back in and let them be scanned so the library; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00029.html (12,423 bytes)
350. [ADSM-L] Operations Center processor requirements (score: 1): Author: Thomas Denier <Thomas.Denier AT JEFFERSON DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 15:12:20 +0000; We recently had an IBM presentation on the future of TSM. The presenter told us that Operations Center was going to change our minds about needing a third party management facility for TSM (we curren; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00030.html (12,863 bytes)
351. [ADSM-L] getting a list of directories to restore (score: 1): Author: "Lee, Gary" <glee AT BSU DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 15:58:36 +0000; We have a restore request which has so many files an dsubdirectories that the client is timing out before restoration can start. Can anyone help with a sql query which will get me a list of all next; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00031.html (10,899 bytes)
352. Re: [ADSM-L] Operations Center processor requirements (score: 1): Author: Robert Jose <rjose AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 09:39:48 -0700; Hi Thomas This tool is "reasonably" accurate, but we do err on the side of specifying more processor capacity to ensure that enough headroom is provided. The developer of the tool says that the proce; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00032.html (14,710 bytes)
353. Re: [ADSM-L] getting a list of directories to restore (score: 1): Author: Skylar Thompson <skylar2 AT U.WASHINGTON DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 10:04:01 -0700; If dsmc restore is timing out, SQL is likely to be even worse. I would try a QUERY BACKUP with dsmc (I've never seen that time out, even when restore is), then create some lists for a -filelist resto; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00033.html (11,608 bytes)
354. Re: [ADSM-L] Operations Center processor requirements (score: 1): Author: Ken Bury <kenbury1 AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 01:54:37 +0000; Another thing to consider is that there has to be a TSM server designated as the hub. The version of the hub server will have to match the OC. The spoke servers can be at lower version than the hub.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00034.html (15,321 bytes)
355. Re: [ADSM-L] Operations Center processor requirements (score: 1): Author: Erwann SIMON <erwann.simon AT FREE DOT FR>; Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 06:24:12 +0200; Hi Ken, Do you mean that you would have a TSM server that would be dedicated to be the hub server, without having any other role (except maybe lib manager and/or config manager) ? In that case, how w; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00035.html (15,816 bytes)
356. [ADSM-L] Installing TSM 7.1.1 (score: 1): Author: Bill Boyer <bjdboyer AT COMCAST DOT NET>; Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 09:28:25 -0400; I have 2 servers, Windows 2008R2 currently running V6.3.4 TSM Server. On one of them when I start the V7.1.1 install the IBM Installer lists all the TSM "packages" to select from. On the other server; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00036.html (11,015 bytes)
357. Re: [ADSM-L] Operations Center processor requirements (score: 1): Author: Ken Bury <kenbury1 AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:39:40 +0000; There are licensing considerations depending on what type of licensing model you have subscribed to. The value of this architecture is the flexibility you have to stay current with the OC updates. On; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00037.html (16,839 bytes)
358. [ADSM-L] scheduleing a restore (score: 1): Author: "Lee, Gary" <glee AT BSU DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 20:15:54 +0000; Is there any way to schedule a client restore? I don't think so, but thought I'd check to see if I missed something somewhere. Didn't see any way in the book, and tried with no success.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00038.html (10,864 bytes)
359. Re: [ADSM-L] scheduleing a restore (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:20:44 -0400; Don't see why not. When I try to define a client schedule, one of the options for "ACTION" is RESTORE.... -- *Zoltan Forray* TSM Software & Hardware Administrator Xymon Monitor Administrator Virginia; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00039.html (11,780 bytes)
360. Re: [ADSM-L] scheduleing a restore (score: 1): Author: Paul-Andre Chasse <paul-andre.chasse AT USHERBROOKE DOT CA>; Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:25:24 -0400; Yes you can. When you create a schedule, you can select 'restore' OR 'Retrieve' as the action. http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.1/com.ibm.itsm.srv.ref.doc/r_cmd_schedule_clien; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-06/msg00040.html (11,976 bytes)

Current List: 341 - 360
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]