Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TDP\s+for\s+ERP\s+\(SAP\s+R\/3\s+on\s+Oracle\)\s*$/: 165981 ]

Total 165981 documents matching your query.

281. Re: [ADSM-L] Moving DB , LOG , ARCHLOG (score: 1)
Author: Ron Delaware <ron.delaware AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:15:22 -0700
Robert, In order to move your TSM database, and logs, you will have to perform a restore db and input the new directories/filespaces that you want the database and logs to reside. Moving both the dat
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00080.html (17,790 bytes)

282. Re: [ADSM-L] Moving DB , LOG , ARCHLOG (score: 1)
Author: Karel Bos <tsm.wad AT GMAIL DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 20:23:55 +0200
Why not config new disk on old disk drive letters and move content of old disk to new disk outside of tsm? Only thing you need the update is the active log size in dsmserv.opt and 1 time restart tsm.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00081.html (12,878 bytes)

283. Re: [ADSM-L] Moving DB , LOG , ARCHLOG (score: 1)
Author: Remco Post <r.post AT PLCS DOT NL>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:12:09 +0200
and then, when all is done, check the db2 settings for active log, and archive log, fix them and restart, despite what the dsmserv.opt says.... Op 22 jul. 2015, om 19:15 heeft Ron Delaware <ron.delaw
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00082.html (15,716 bytes)

284. Re: [ADSM-L] Moving DB , LOG , ARCHLOG (score: 1)
Author: "Vandeventer, Harold [OITS]" <Harold.Vandeventer AT KS DOT GOV>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:29:13 +0000
I've used the recommendation made a day or two ago where Tivoli gets shutdown and the files copied to the new locations. Then, map the new locations using the previous drive letters. Boot and it has
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00083.html (16,979 bytes)

285. [ADSM-L] Flashcopy Manager and EMC XtremIO (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Denier <Thomas.Denier AT JEFFERSON DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:23:08 +0000
We are considering an EMC XtremIO flash array for a large database application. I am trying to find out whether Flashcopy Manager supports this device. IBM seems to be unable to state a consistent po
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00084.html (12,071 bytes)

286. [ADSM-L] OnCommand System Manager 2.2 or 3.0 (score: 1)
Author: "Rhodes, Richard L." <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:34:51 +0000
IBM N3220 - 2857-A22 (NetApp FAS2240-2) Data ONTAP Release 8.1.2P1 7-Mode We currently use OnCommand System manager 2.2. It has quit working because SSL in browsers has been deactivated on all Window
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00085.html (11,246 bytes)

287. Re: [ADSM-L] Flashcopy Manager and EMC XtremIO (score: 1)
Author: Del Hoobler <hoobler AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 19:28:46 -0400
Hi Thomas, For FCM Unix and Linux - No, unless placed under an SVC For FCM VMware - No, unless placed under an SVC For FCM Windows - If EMC's VSS provider supports it, then FCM Windows support its Yo
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00086.html (12,870 bytes)

288. [ADSM-L] RTC on DB SSD disks (score: 1)
Author: Robert Ouzen <rouzen AT UNIV.HAIFA.AC DOT IL>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 07:12:05 +0000
Hello all We are in process installing a new Storage V7000 from IBM in our organization. Coming with the feature RTC ( Real time compression) , I wonder if for our new SSD for TSM DB , I can enable R
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00087.html (10,805 bytes)

289. Re: [ADSM-L] RTC on DB SSD disks (score: 1)
Author: "Huebner, Andy" <andy.huebner AT NOVARTIS DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:26:46 +0000
We are looking at RTS (Flash Systems and DS8000) for other purposes so I have no practical experience yet. The only drawback I see is it will increase the latency as you are waiting on a CPU to de/co
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00088.html (11,643 bytes)

290. Re: [ADSM-L] RTC on DB SSD disks (score: 1)
Author: Del Hoobler <hoobler AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:32:12 -0400
Hi Robert, We have done some testing with this. We have decided not to use RTC with our blueprint references. The trade off is between maximum performance and maximum storage savings, and we are taki
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00089.html (11,738 bytes)

291. [ADSM-L] Delete F.S (score: 1)
Author: Robert Ouzen <rouzen AT UNIV.HAIFA.AC DOT IL>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 07:34:04 +0000
Hi to all I made today a MOVE NODEDATA of a client WWW from storage DD_EDUCATION to storage V3700_1 The process did not finish successfully , some volumes with read errors. Now I got with command Q O
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00090.html (12,015 bytes)

292. Re: [ADSM-L] Delete F.S (score: 1)
Author: Krzysztof Przygoda <przygod AT GMAIL DOT COM>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 11:48:51 +0200
Hi Robert Did you try to repair data/volumes in that old storage pool (even with audit vol fix=yes if you don't care about that data ) ? After fixing try to run move nodedata agian. ps. I guess you w
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00091.html (13,266 bytes)

293. Re: [ADSM-L] Delete F.S (score: 1)
Author: Robert Ouzen <rouzen AT UNIV.HAIFA.AC DOT IL>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 09:56:06 +0000
HI Krzysztof It's why I am doing now , running on those volumes an audit vol fix=yes. When finishing will re-run a move nodedata Bu if this will no help I am stuck !. Thinking to rename the F.S to _O
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00092.html (13,952 bytes)

294. Re: [ADSM-L] Delete F.S (score: 1)
Author: Krzysztof Przygoda <przygod AT GMAIL DOT COM>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 16:05:10 +0200
Hi Robert Instead of renaming filespaces maybe the better option would be just to rename the node to old_node and create the new one with the same name. Then just grant access for the new node for al
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00093.html (15,286 bytes)

295. Re: [ADSM-L] Journal Based Backup on RHEL5 (score: 1)
Author: "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:33:46 +0000
Hi guys! Just to let you know and so it's documented in the ADSM-L archives: I received an answer from IBM Support that there is no RHEL5 package for JBB out of the box. If you want it you have to co
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00094.html (13,899 bytes)

296. Re: [ADSM-L] Delete F.S (score: 1)
Author: Bas van Kampen <b.vankampen AT INTERCONNECT DOT NL>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 08:02:51 +0000
Robert, I had the same problem. I made a service request for this. I can be fixed with a "repair occupancy" command. http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21579500 Before running this comm
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00095.html (15,063 bytes)

297. Re: [ADSM-L] RTC on DB SSD disks (score: 1)
Author: Matthew McGeary <Matthew.McGeary AT POTASHCORP DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:52:37 -0600
Hello Robert, The key with the real-time compression on v7000 is to buy the compression add-in card that IBM supplies. That offloads all compression workloads from the primary CPU/RAM on the v7000 co
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00096.html (13,300 bytes)

298. [ADSM-L] anr1880w and other db lock conflicts suddenly appearing (score: 1)
Author: "Lee, Gary" <glee AT BSU DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:53:53 +0000
Tsm server 6.2.5, RHEL 6.5. I know, out of support, trying to get to 6.3.4 next week. Suddenly I am getting "anr1880w" messages. Processes being cancelled because of conflicting locks on table af_bit
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00097.html (11,118 bytes)

299. Re: [ADSM-L] anr1880w and other db lock conflicts suddenly appearing (score: 1)
Author: Matthew McGeary <Matthew.McGeary AT POTASHCORP DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:51:48 -0600
Hello Gary, Are you running deduplication? The IBM technote on managing deduplication and DB growth references this code directly: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21452146 It can be
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00098.html (13,956 bytes)

300. Re: [ADSM-L] anr1880w and other db lock conflicts suddenly appearing (score: 1)
Author: "Lee, Gary" <glee AT BSU DOT EDU>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 12:14:29 +0000
Not running dedup, but will check into your other suggestions. Thanks. Hello Gary, Are you running deduplication? The IBM technote on managing deduplication and DB growth references this code directl
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00099.html (13,035 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu