Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*How\s+to\s+order\s+Netview\s*$/: 34715 ]

Total 34715 documents matching your query.

341. RE: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:15:08 -0500
On Unix, only those traps selected by the TEC ruleset specified in /usr/OV/conf/tecint.conf will be forwarded to TEC. The flow is like this: trapd gets all traps --> sends all traps to nvcorrd --> nv
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00034.html (28,714 bytes)

342. RE: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec (score: 1)
Author: "Senthil Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani AT ust-global DOT com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:54:29 +0530
Thanks James! But I have the rule specified in my ruleset TEC_ITS.rs to forward the events to TEC. Moreover when I try to send a test trap with the same enterprise ID using SNMPTRAP utility, I can se
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00035.html (33,872 bytes)

343. RE: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec (score: 1)
Author: Leslie Clark <lclark AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:14:23 -0500
The most likely cause is that the traps from the devices and the traps you are generating are not using the exact same enterprise, generic, and specific trap ids. Devices don't always send what you e
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00036.html (30,576 bytes)

344. [NV-L] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Franck Mercier <franck.mercier AT fr.ibm DOT com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:18:01 +0100
I will be out of the office starting 23/02/2009 and will not return until 26/02/2009. back on 26/02 9AM _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00037.html (10,585 bytes)

345. RE: [NV-L] SNMP polling config file(s) (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:56:39 -0500
OK, thanks for the very good answer. I tried the help button in the SNMP configuration dialog box but I receive an error regarding a path. I also check the manuals on line and which are the same as I
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00038.html (17,017 bytes)

346. RE: [NV-L] SNMP polling config file(s) (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:26:02 -0500
If you are getting a path error using Help, then there is a problem with your installation. The Help pages are displayed by a browser such as mozilla (nee Netscape) and you have to have that installe
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00039.html (17,461 bytes)

347. RE: [NV-L] SNMP polling config file(s) (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:24:49 -0500
Perfect and as always great information. The reason I asked about turning off new node discovery is that we may double the number of managed devices and the devices are located in another part of the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00040.html (16,065 bytes)

348. RE: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec (score: 1)
Author: "Senthil Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani AT ust-global DOT com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:06:21 +0530
Thanks Leslie! I shall definitely do that and try to trace where is the root cause. I have one more query, if the trapd.log is showing the message from device properly formatted, does that mean the t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00041.html (38,524 bytes)

349. [NV-L] Netview SNMPv3 support (score: 1)
Author: Juergen W Scholich <SCHOLICH AT de.ibm DOT com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:16:57 +0100
Hi, is there currently any SNMPv3 support included in netview 7.1.5 ? Or, if not, are there any plans to include this in the future ? -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Best regards / Avec mes meilleures
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00042.html (12,124 bytes)

350. RE: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec (score: 1)
Author: Leslie Clark <lclark AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:23:28 -0500
Not so. The trap formatting is more forgiving. An enterprise of 1.3.6.1.4.1 in trapd.conf will match 1.3.6.1.4.1.* from a device. So there is hope. Cordially, Leslie A. Clark IT Services Specialist,
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00043.html (34,402 bytes)

351. RE: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec (score: 1)
Author: "Senthil Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani AT ust-global DOT com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:46:34 +0530
Yes, that is true. So I presume if I add a 0 suffix to the enterprise ID may resolve the issue. Moreover, I have enabled the nvcorrd debug (nvcdebug d rules) but the logs are being written so fast th
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00044.html (26,662 bytes)

352. RE: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec (score: 1)
Author: "Senthil Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani AT ust-global DOT com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:48:39 +0530
Yes, that is true. So I presume if I add a 0 suffix to the enterprise ID may resolve the issue. Moreover, I have enabled the nvcorrd debug (nvcdebug d rules) but the logs are being written so fast th
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00045.html (15,958 bytes)

353. RE: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:43:26 -0500
Senny, You should not be asking anyone on this forum for assistance in looking at logs. You should open a problem (PMR) to IBM Support and let the people whose job it is to assist you do that. James
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00046.html (13,065 bytes)

354. RE: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec (score: 1)
Author: Leslie Clark <lclark AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:53:08 -0500
Well, you could adjust the formatting of the trap in trapd.conf to include the variables $E $e $G $S, if they are not already there. Then you can look at them in trapd.log at your leisure. The $E and
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00047.html (18,113 bytes)

355. Re: [NV-L] Netview SNMPv3 support (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:04:14 -0500
NetView is at end of life and has been so since 2007. There will be no new releases, only FixPacks for APARs until it goes out of Support at the end of the first quarter of 2012. NetView does not hav
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00048.html (15,969 bytes)

356. RE: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec (score: 1)
Author: "Senthil Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani AT ust-global DOT com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:44:18 +0530
I think that should really help me to identify the Enterprise ID. Then I think, I can go ahead with changing the trapd.conf accordingly. Thanks and let you know the result. Cheers Senny From: nv-l-bo
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00049.html (23,160 bytes)

357. RE: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec (score: 1)
Author: "Senthil Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani AT ust-global DOT com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:00:56 +0530
James, I was trying to find a way out to bring down the rate at which the messages being written to nvcorrd logs, because it is so fast. Yes definitely I shall contact support for further help if I c
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00050.html (15,180 bytes)

358. Fw: [NV-L] Netview SNMPv3 support (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:08:34 -0500
I should have also added that NetView has been replaced by IBM Tivoli Network Manager (ITNM) which is already SNMPv3 capable. The latest version (3.8) also supports IPv6. James Shanks Tivoli Network
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00051.html (19,009 bytes)

359. RESOLVED: [NV-L] trapd forwarding to tec (score: 1)
Author: "Senthil Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani AT ust-global DOT com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:24:14 +0530
Leslie Great day for me to start! Yes it really resolved my issue by adding a 0 at the end of actual enterprise ID. Now I started seeing the event being flown towards TEC. Even I had a look into MIB
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00052.html (25,822 bytes)

360. [NV-L] NetView 7.1.5 Upgrade and supported Linux OS (score: 1)
Author: Kaj Kortnum Mogensen <KAMO AT dk.ibm DOT com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:48:40 +0100
Hi I have following question regarding Tivoli Netview 7.1.5 and supported linux OS. Hope you can help answer it. Can Tivoli Netview 7.1.5 run on Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES 5.0 and is it supported to
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-02/msg00053.html (11,431 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu