All, Does anyone know how to interpret this output in netmon.trace? 14:24:39 : LOG: DUP_ADDR: addAddress_(): Adding w.x.238.1 14:24:39 : LOG: DUP_ADDR: addAddress_(): Adding w.x.232.1 14:24:39 : LOG:
All, We're getting delayed responses when running demand poll against devices. What's the best way to troubleshoot this issue? We looked in netmon.trace and saw false positive DUP_ADDR errors on HSRP
Author: John M Gatrell <John.Gatrell AT uk.ibm DOT com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:18:24 +0100
Try the following. Choose just one IP address (the most reliable or the nearest) to do snmp polls of a router (A loopback address if Cisco). Inform NetView of the HSRP address with the percent charac
Thanks John. Stephanie -- On Mon, 9/13/10, John M Gatrell <John.Gatrell AT uk.ibm DOT com> wrote: From: John M Gatrell <John.Gatrell AT uk.ibm DOT com> Subject: Re: [NV-L] Slow Response from nmdemand
All, If NV_NETMON_LOCK_LOOPBACK_SNMPADDR is set to true in netmon.conf, will that force NetView to use the loopback address for SNMP ipAddress? What will happen when netmon does status polling and ge
Author: Francois Le Hir <flehir AT ca.ibm DOT com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 12:55:38 -0400
If the loopback address doesn't respond to snmp and the status polling is set to snmp then the device will be considered down. If the status polling is not snmp but ping then the interfaces could be
All, How does NetView use the following property setting when it's set to False (default) or True: NV_NETMON_IGNORE_RESP_SNMPADDR Stephanie _______________________________________________ NV-L mailin
Author: Francois Le Hir <flehir AT ca.ibm DOT com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:14:41 -0400
By default when netview does a snmp query on a specific ip and get the response from a different ip, it would change the snmp ip to use the new one for all further queries. This netmon option is used
I have submitted several request to Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com and it appears that I am off for awhile, then all of a sudden I'm back on... Respectfully, Dave ____________________
Author: "Kelly Root" <kelly.root AT hewitt DOT com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:52:32 -0500
I AGREE - I have unsubscribed multiple times - get the confirmation - and then a couple months later I'm getting emails again. We don't have Netview anymore and I want off this mailing list. Thanks,
Author: "Amir, Mohammed - Corporate Core - ICT Services" <Mohammed.Amir AT Oxfordshire.gov DOT uk>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 19:58:02 +0100
Could I also be removed from this list please as we have also moved on from this product. Thanks The information in this e-mail, together with any attachments, is confidential. If you have received t
Author: Robert Clancy <ROCLANCY AT uk.ibm DOT com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 20:05:50 +0100
I am out of the office until 09/08/2010. I am currently on holiday I shall return to the office Note: This is an automated response to your message "NV-L Digest, Vol 45, Issue 1" sent on 6/8/10 17:35
All, Does anyone know why netmon would terminate with a signal 1 (SIGHUP)? TIA, Stephanie _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com Unsubscribe:NV
I have submitted several request to Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com and it appears that I am off for awhile, then all of a sudden I'm back on... Respectfully, Dave ____________________
Author: Francois Le Hir <flehir AT ca.ibm DOT com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:03:58 -0400
I think the traffic is very low on this list and this is the reason why you think you are off and then on again. We just now often have weeks without any activity. did you try sending to NV-L-leave A
Author: "Evans, Bill" <Bill.Evans AT hq.doe DOT gov>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:18:36 -0400
Can anyone shed light on the parameters of the "synchronizing" process that takes place periodically as maps are manipulated. I don't see much processor time being used (using the TOP command) but it
That sounds about right. It is the synchronization between the object database and the map that you have opened. It has update not only the status of every object in the map, but any changes that hav
No. The synchronizing is between the GUI, specifically ipmap, and the underlying NetView databases. It usually happens at start-up when ipmap asks ovtopmd for all the status changes that have occurre
Author: Robert Clancy <ROCLANCY AT uk.ibm DOT com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:05:35 +0100
I am out of the office until 30/08/2010. I am currently on holiday / Vacation and returning to the office on Monday 23rd August, On my return I will go straight into an IBM Redbook residency until Mo
Author: "Evans, Bill" <Bill.Evans AT hq.doe DOT gov>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:37:50 -0400
Thanks for the clarification. My engineers did a massive "cleanup" of the cables in the switch room and networks moved all over the place. Doing a "-A" instead of a "-a" on ovtopofix may have helped.