Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Heads\s+up\:\s+RHELv4\s+U3\s+dump\s+format\s+issues\s*$/: 30137 ]

Total 30137 documents matching your query.

341. Backup issues with OpenBSD 4.5 machines (score: 1)
Author: stan <stanb AT panix DOT com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:09:41 -0400
WE deployed 3 OpenBSD machines yesterday to replace older OpenBSD machines that had been backing up happily. I honestly cannot remember which version of Amanda was on these machines. The new ones hav
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00064.html (12,948 bytes)

342. Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86 (score: 1)
Author: Brian Cuttler <brian AT wadsworth DOT org>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:47:21 -0400
Dustin, I used the same directory and ported the structure to the new system to run the install, but I rebuilt it and must have had the libraries incorrect since there there 3 library problems with t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00065.html (15,983 bytes)

343. Re: [Amanda-users] Advice needed on Linux backup strategy to LTO-4 tape (score: 1)
Author: Rory Campbell-Lange <rory AT campbell-lange DOT net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:57:45 +0100
Hi Chris I liked this idea about tape archives -- constant pruning and maintenance. Difficult to sell though. <snip> Great; thanks for the pointers. <snip> If all the storage is locally attached (act
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00066.html (17,015 bytes)

344. Re: Backup issues with OpenBSD 4.5 machines (score: 1)
Author: Jean-Louis Martineau <martineau AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:50:22 -0400
gzip: stdout: Resource temporarily unavailable I have no idea what's that error mean. Can you try the latest 2.6.1p1 snapshot from http://www.zmanda.com/community-builds.php Jean-Louis stan wrote: WE
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00067.html (13,007 bytes)

345. Re: [Amanda-users] Advice needed on Linux backup strategy to LTO-4 tape (score: 1)
Author: Cyrille Bollu <Cyrille.Bollu AT fedasil DOT be>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:19:18 +0200
Hi, Here's my (very) small personnal experience: A few years ago, when I tried it, I couldn't enable server-side software compression while bypassing the holding disk with my IBM ULTIUM LTO-3 drive:
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00068.html (18,160 bytes)

346. Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86 - library dependency (score: 1)
Author: Brian Cuttler <brian AT wadsworth DOT org>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:22:39 -0400
On Curie, I did a make clean in /tmp/ivan/amanda-261-patched/amandad-src and then a make. Checking ./.libs/amandad I find no evidence of the 2.4.5 library. [curie]: /usr/tmp/ivan/amanda-261-patched/a
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00069.html (19,635 bytes)

347. Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86 - library dependency (score: 1)
Author: Brian Cuttler <brian AT wadsworth DOT org>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:57:39 -0400
I'm not at all certain I understand this. [curie] /usr/local/libexec/amanda 2> hostname curie [curie] /usr/local/libexec/amanda 3> pwd curie:/usr/local/libexec/amanda [curie] /usr/local/libexec/amand
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00070.html (16,757 bytes)

348. Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86 - library dependency (score: 1)
Author: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:45:39 -0400
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Brian Cuttler<brian AT wadsworth DOT org> wrote: This is really best handled by those who are skilled in the ways of Solaris -- the operating system has lots of weird
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00071.html (13,515 bytes)

349. Re: Backup issues with OpenBSD 4.5 machines (score: 1)
Author: stan <stanb AT panix DOT com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:52:28 -0400
OK, I compiled and installed that version. Re-ran a backup, and the results were similar. A total of 2 of the 12 filesystems on 3 machines suceded, the rest were PARTIAL. Debuging sugestions welcome.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00072.html (12,607 bytes)

350. Re: backup client on SUSE (score: 1)
Author: stan <stanb AT panix DOT com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:54:03 -0400
Look at your logs /var/log/messages etc for inetd messages. Restart inetd, and look again. -- One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicat
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00073.html (11,468 bytes)

351. Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86 - library dependency (score: 1)
Author: Brian Cuttler <brian AT wadsworth DOT org>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:29:01 -0400
Chris, We will remove the old libraries, that should take care of it. for completeness though, I just don't understand why we get two different results in the same binary ? Actually, for the binary o
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00074.html (16,785 bytes)

352. Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86 - library dependency (score: 1)
Author: Chris Hoogendyk <hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:12:25 -0400
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Brian Cuttler<brian AT wadsworth DOT org> wrote: They look like the same binary but don't act like the same binary. This is really best hand
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00075.html (14,974 bytes)

353. Re: Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris x86 - library dependency (score: 1)
Author: Chris Hoogendyk <hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:45:39 -0400
We will remove the old libraries, that should take care of it. for completeness though, I just don't understand why we get two different results in the same binary ? Actually, for the binary on Curie
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00076.html (16,867 bytes)

354. Re: [Amanda-users] Advice needed on Linux backup strategy to LTO-4 tape (score: 1)
Author: Chris Hoogendyk <hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:27:01 -0400
A few years ago, when I tried it, I couldn't enable server-side software compression while bypassing the holding disk with my IBM ULTIUM LTO-3 drive: Tape speed was sinking to about 5MB/s. My backup
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00077.html (16,263 bytes)

355. Re: Backup issues with OpenBSD 4.5 machines (score: 1)
Author: Jean-Louis Martineau <martineau AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:26:10 -0400
Check system log Post complete amandad.*.debug and sendbackup.*.debug. You can try to disable client compression. Jean-Louis I have no idea what's that error mean. Can you try the latest 2.6.1p1 snap
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00078.html (13,451 bytes)

356. clarification on parallelism (score: 1)
Author: Chris Hoogendyk <hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:46:03 -0400
In the process of answering questions for others, I have tried researching this and can't determine for sure what the answer is. In the original presentation of Amanda http://www.usenix.org/publicati
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00079.html (12,474 bytes)

357. Re: clarification on parallelism (score: 1)
Author: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:48:25 -0400
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Chris Hoogendyk<hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT Amanda still requires a DLE to go completely to holding disk before being taped. It compresses the DLE "on the fly" on the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00080.html (11,247 bytes)

358. Re: [Amanda-users] Advice needed on Linux backup strategy to LTO-4 tape (score: 1)
Author: Chris Hoogendyk <hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:17:14 -0400
On 13/08/09, Chris Hoogendyk (hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu) wrote: <snip> Typically, we set up Amanda with holding disk space. <snip> If all the storage is locally attached (actually, AoE drives st
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00081.html (17,462 bytes)

359. Re: [Amanda-users] Advice needed on Linux backup strategy to LTO-4 tape (score: 1)
Author: Frank Smith <fsmith AT hoovers DOT com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:42:59 -0500
You might want to consider configuring for client compression. Not only will that give you more CPU for feeding your tape, it also minimizes network bandwidth. As usual, YMMV, it all depends on where
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00082.html (17,326 bytes)

360. Re: [Amanda-users] Advice needed on Linux backup strategy to LTO-4 tape (score: 1)
Author: Rory Campbell-Lange <rory AT campbell-lange DOT net>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:30:47 +0100
In our case the server _is_ the only client, with up to 30TB of direct attached storage, with the storage running at between 80MB/s and 120MB/s access speeds (Bytes rather than bytes). I don't know i
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2009-08/msg00083.html (15,353 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu