Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Archive\s+vs\.\s+Backup\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Archive vs. Backup (score: 1)
Author: Hilton Tina <HiltonT AT TCE DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 11:36:14 -0500
If you pay to license 10 client nodes, it's 10 clients even if they all run on one box. Each registered client is one off the number of licenses you bought. Tina
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-01/msg01132.html (16,671 bytes)

22. Re: Archive vs. Backup (score: 1)
Author: Paul Fielding <paul.fielding AT HOME DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 13:23:58 -0700
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-01/msg01144.html (11,672 bytes)

23. Re: Archive vs. Backup (score: 1)
Author: Kelly J. Lipp <lipp AT storsol DOT com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 04:35:00 -0500
matter how many instances of the BA client run was what I thought!
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-01/msg01146.html (11,840 bytes)

24. Re: Archive vs. Backup (score: 1)
Author: Robin Sharpe <robin_sharpe AT HOTMAIL DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 06:29:39 PST
Curtis, It could actually be much worse than that, as we have discovered. The default behavior of Archive is to FOLLOW SYMBOLIC LINKS. Thus if you have a 10GB file on a client, and there is a symboli
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-01/msg01280.html (13,051 bytes)

25. Archive vs. Backup (score: 1)
Author: "Magura, Curtis" <curtis.magura AT LMCO DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 01:46:01 -0600
... If I understand Archive correctly I will be making a complete copy of my data and keeping it in an Archive pool. Does this mean that I am basically doing a complete copy of our disk farm every th
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-01/msg01281.html (11,327 bytes)

26. Re: Archive vs. Backup (score: 1)
Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 10:10:45 -0500
This is as it should be. The intent of archival operations is to preserve images of data at given points in time, to serve versioning, legal, and other needs. A symbolic link is only an allusion to
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-01/msg01286.html (13,189 bytes)

27. Re: Archive vs. Backup (score: 1)
Author: Bill Colwell <bcolwell AT DRAPER DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 12:45:30 -0500
Every time the {month/quarter/year/decade}-end discussion starts, it reminds me of an enhancement request I submitted years ago, which IBM took as a suggestion. I still think it would solve this prob
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-01/msg01313.html (15,632 bytes)

28. Re: Archive vs. Backup (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Elrick <belrick AT HOME DOT COM>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 03:41:35 -0500
begin SOAPBOX.STANZA Richard, I think your interpretation of 'the praradigm' is narrow. The 'image' of the data, it seems to me, should preserve the data as it exists. If that means that it preserves
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-01/msg01328.html (15,856 bytes)

29. Re: Archive vs. Backup (score: 1)
Author: Tom Harald Engen <Tom.Harald.Engen AT NO.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 12:51:55 +0000
Status Distribution January 30, 1999 12:50:29 The message regarding "Re: Archive vs. Backup" sent on January 30, 1999 12:50:29 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Native Name ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-01/msg01336.html (12,310 bytes)

30. Re: Archive vs. Backup (score: 1)
Author: Roger Stakkestad <rogers AT NO.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 12:51:55 +0000
Status Distribution January 30, 1999 12:50:33 The message regarding "Re: Archive vs. Backup" sent on January 30, 1999 12:50:33 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Native Name ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-01/msg01337.html (12,170 bytes)

31. Re: Archive vs. Backup (score: 1)
Author: Odd Magne Sekkingstad <oddmagne AT NO.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 12:51:56 +0000
Status Distribution January 30, 1999 12:50:33 The message regarding "Re: Archive vs. Backup" sent on January 30, 1999 12:50:33 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Native Name ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-01/msg01338.html (12,145 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu