Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Antwort\:\s+Re\:\s+each\s+dbbackup\s+to\s+new\s+tape\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Antwort\:\s+Re\:\s+each\s+dbbackup\s+to\s+new\s+tape\?\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Antwort: Re: each dbbackup to new tape? (score: 1): Author: Hoa V Nguyen <nguyenhv AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:37:33 -0500; Hi Lucian, We do very simple: Through TSM schedule to backup DB with flat file to Disk beginning of hour. 45' later a script to archive the file to other site. If somethings happen we can get data fr; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-09/msg00336.html (14,177 bytes)
22. Re: Antwort: Re: each dbbackup to new tape? (score: 1): Author: "Mark D. Rodriguez" <mark AT MDRCONSULT DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 11:08:53 -0500; I have to agree with Milton on this one. It seems the system that you describe has some issues that would make me want to have an updated resume! Here is what I have been doing for many years. There; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-09/msg00342.html (17,238 bytes)
23. Re: Antwort: Re: each dbbackup to new tape? (score: 1): Author: Nicholas Cassimatis <nickpc AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 18:53:53 -0400; Are you doing OS level backups (sysback/mksysb on AIX, similar tool on other OS platforms) of your TSM Server for DR? If you are, you can "cheat" one of two ways: 1. Do your TSM DBBackup to disk, the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-09/msg00349.html (12,027 bytes)
24. Re: Antwort: Re: each dbbackup to new tape? (score: 1): Author: Roger Deschner <rogerd AT UIC DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:09:27 -0500; The procedure for doing this is documented in the Tivoli manuals. The answer is: run two copies of TSM server, and have them back up their databases to each other. It would be better if they ran on s; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-09/msg00357.html (13,038 bytes)
25. Re: Antwort: Re: each dbbackup to new tape? (score: 1): Author: Henk ten Have <hthta AT NCSA.UIUC DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 01:37:20 -0500; If you have two copies of TSM server, fine. If not, you have to pay for your second copy. I bet it's much cheaper to buy some tapes and send them offline. Cheers, Henk ten Have (back after one year); /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-09/msg00359.html (11,502 bytes)
26. Re: Antwort: Re: each dbbackup to new tape? (score: 1): Author: Otto Schakenbos <otto.schakenbos AT TELEFLEX DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:49:23 +0200; This is a multi-part message in MIME format.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-09/msg00360.html (11,200 bytes)
27. Re: Antwort: Re: each dbbackup to new tape? (score: 1): Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 05:37:06 -0400; Storing a TSM server's database backup inside another TSM server strikes me as a very bad idea. Fundamental recovery such as that of a TSM server calls for rudimentary, uncomplicated data preservati; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2004-09/msg00361.html (12,095 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 27
Page: [1] [2]