Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+NV714\s+\-\s+nvserverd\s+error\s+when\s+trying\s+to\s+send\s+events\s+to\s+TEC\s*$/: 34715 ]

Total 34715 documents matching your query.

281. RE: [NV-L] SNMP MIB Labels creating issues! (score: 1)
Author: Leslie Clark <lclark AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:32:03 -0400
Ha Ha. Got it. So which kind of UPS devices are they? APC? Liebert? The sharing of a particular mib label is not usually a problem in Netview. The whole oid is usually involved, so it is fully qualif
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00012.html (18,840 bytes)

282. RE: [NV-L] SNMP MIB Labels creating issues! (score: 1)
Author: "Senthil Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani AT ust-global DOT com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:23:58 +0530
I am trying to bring the Emerson UPS under monitoring for its load. The enterprise ID is 1.3.6.1.4.1.13400. The MIB I loaded is ITRUST_UPS_UL33.MIB. I have two problems 1. Inside the MIB, there are t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00013.html (28,614 bytes)

283. RE: [NV-L] SNMP MIB Labels creating issues! (score: 1)
Author: Leslie Clark <lclark AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:06:46 -0400
Something simple is getting in your way. There should not be any duplicate labels in one mib. Support is very good at cleaning up mib files, You should call Support and open a PMR. Cordially, Leslie
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00014.html (23,802 bytes)

284. [NV-L] NetView upgrade from 7.1.4 to 7.1.5 (score: 1)
Author: Kaj Kortnum Mogensen <KAMO AT dk.ibm DOT com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:26:55 +0100
Hi I am trying to upgrade netview-appl on a Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 3 server from netview 7.1.4 with fixpack5 to netview 7.1.5 (base) Because the installation fails in the configuration-s
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00015.html (13,654 bytes)

285. [NV-L] Keith Posner is out sick today (score: 1)
Author: Keith Posner <POSNERKE AT uk.ibm DOT com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:59:36 +0000
I will be out of the office starting 16/03/2009 and will not return until 17/03/2009. I'm out sick today but expect to be back in the office tomorrow. I will be checking my email later this afternoon
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00016.html (10,824 bytes)

286. Re: [NV-L] NetView upgrade from 7.1.4 to 7.1.5 (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:17:03 -0400
Technically you should be installing on RHEL 4 according to the NetView Installation Guide for 7.1.5. You can view it here along with all the rest of the NetView 7.1.5 documentation: http://publib.bo
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00017.html (16,791 bytes)

287. [NV-L] NetView 7.15 and the Dummy Shell (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:22:25 -0400
Hello again, We are running two NetView servers on AIX using ver 7.15 and could not find any documentation on the "dummyShell" dialog box that start when we start an xwindows session. What is the dum
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00018.html (13,418 bytes)

288. Re: [NV-L] NetView 7.15 and the Dummy Shell (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:56:21 -0400
I have no idea what you are talking about. I suggest you open a problem to NetView Level 2. James Shanks Tivoli Network Availability Management Level Three Network Availability Management Tivoli Soft
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00019.html (16,968 bytes)

289. Re: [NV-L] NetView 7.15 and the Dummy Shell (score: 1)
Author: John Thomas <johnt AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:16:54 -0400
The Dummy Shell is a product of Hummingbird Exceed. I have not found any way to eliminate it. John Thomas NetView Distributed Level 2 Support Inactive hide details for James Shanks/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00020.html (19,493 bytes)

290. RE: [NV-L] NetView 7.15 and the Dummy Shell (score: 1)
Author: "Jorge Jiles" <jorge.jiles AT ualberta DOT ca>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:31:52 -0600
The dummy shell is part of your X-Windows client (hummingbird exceed) and not part of Netview. There is no way to eliminate it. if you close it, it kills your X session. If you use another client thi
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00021.html (15,962 bytes)

291. RE: [NV-L] NetView 7.15 and the Dummy Shell (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:11:49 -0400
Thank you all for the replies. I understand now. The only way I have been successful in eliminating this window is after the session is started and then to perform a The window disappears. Kevin Sper
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00022.html (18,001 bytes)

292. [NV-L] Bringing Device under monitoring without ICMP/SNMP (score: 1)
Author: "Senthil Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani AT ust-global DOT com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:43:04 +0530
Hi Team, I am planning to bring a device under monitoring purview of Netview 7.1.5. The challenge here is (may be just for me), I don&#8217;t have either ICMP and SNMP Access to the subject device, b
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00023.html (14,292 bytes)

293. Re: [NV-L] Bringing Device under monitoring without ICMP/SNMP (score: 1)
Author: Leslie Clark <lclark AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:27:50 -0400
Yes, well, I always say, if you want to manage something, it has to be managaBLE. But yes, there is the service manager function that can discover and test ports. You will have to add the node to the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00024.html (15,480 bytes)

294. RE: [NV-L] Bringing Device under monitoring without ICMP/SNMP (score: 1)
Author: "Senthil Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani AT ust-global DOT com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:57:20 +0530
Thanks for your help! I have loaded the device, unmanged the interface and added into servmon.conf for monitor particular port status. I have a small query here. After un-managing a device or interfa
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00025.html (20,254 bytes)

295. RE: [NV-L] Bringing Device under monitoring without ICMP/SNMP (score: 1)
Author: Leslie Clark <lclark AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:50:56 -0400
The Unmanage of the interface only tells netmon not to poll it for IP status. The interface card will not contribute to the status of the node object at the IP Internet level of the map or submap. If
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00026.html (19,460 bytes)

296. RE: [NV-L] Bringing Device under monitoring without ICMP/SNMP (score: 1)
Author: "Senthil Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani AT ust-global DOT com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:09:37 +0530
Yes. In fact I am monitoring this device now through Servmon for certain port status. Hope event still will generated when NetView/Servmon fail to obtain the port status. Hope, answer is yes. Thanks
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00027.html (25,573 bytes)

297. RE: [NV-L] Bringing Device under monitoring without ICMP/SNMP (score: 1)
Author: Leslie Clark <lclark AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:20:07 -0400
Yes, servmon causes status change events to be generated if you have configured it properly. Cordially, Leslie A. Clark IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt Information Technology Services Americas I
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00028.html (22,552 bytes)

298. [NV-L] Good bye to the list... (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Seibold" <Michael.Seibold AT gek DOT de>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:12:07 +0100
Hi all, after more than ten years of work with Netview I want to say good by to the list. I want to thank specially Jane Curry, James Shanks and Leslie Clark for their contributions to the list, I le
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00029.html (11,294 bytes)

299. RESOLVED: [NV-L] Bringing Device under monitoring without ICMP/SNMP (score: 1)
Author: "Senthil Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani AT ust-global DOT com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:08:23 +0530
Sorry I forgot to update you! Yes it is working and really thanks again. Cheers Senny From: nv-l-bounces AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com [mailto:nv-l-bounces AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com] On Behalf Of Leslie Clar
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00030.html (30,073 bytes)

300. [NV-L] set a value to a LIST_OF STRING in trapd.conf (score: 1)
Author: Francois Le Hir <flehir AT ca.ibm DOT com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:18:34 -0400
Hi List, Using Netview 7.1.5 on AIX Is it possible in trapd.conf to set a value to a slot defined in TEC as a LIST_OF STRING ? either adding a value to a list with an existing default value or settin
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00031.html (11,655 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu