Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+NV714\s+\-\s+nvserverd\s+error\s+when\s+trying\s+to\s+send\s+events\s+to\s+TEC\s*$/: 34715 ]

Total 34715 documents matching your query.

261. [NV-L] Automatic Population of SNMP Conf Table (score: 1)
Author: ss cc <steph_cornish AT yahoo DOT com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
All, Does anyone know how to turn off NetView auto populating the SNMP configuration table? Every 120 days we're required to change SNMP RO/RW on all devices under management. While I push the new st
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-04/msg00011.html (11,651 bytes)

262. [NV-L] for PMR issues send mail to tivoli_support AT ecurep.ibm DOT com with PMR number in Suject line (score: 1)
Author: Franck Mercier <franck.mercier AT fr.ibm DOT com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:04:49 +0200
I will be out of the office starting 27/04/2009 and will not return until 30/04/2009. _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com Unsubscribe:NV-L-l
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-04/msg00012.html (11,055 bytes)

263. Re: [NV-L] Automatic Population of SNMP Conf Table (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:03:45 -0400
Stephanie, I suggest you open a problem to Level 2 and discuss your procedure with them. They can help you find one that works in your environment. Our lab folks have the same requirement and they ju
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-04/msg00013.html (15,821 bytes)

264. [NV-L] NvserverdPrimeTecEvents=NO (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:35:28 -0400
Hello again, Running NetView 7.1.5 on unix with TEC integration via adapter. Could someone inform me as to what the significance is of this switch is in the tecint.conf file? I assume the default is
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-04/msg00014.html (12,395 bytes)

265. Re: [NV-L] NvserverdPrimeTecEvents=NO (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:07:27 -0400
Kevin, All the entries in the tecint.conf file are explained in the NetView for UNIX Administrator's Reference. Look under "tecint.conf" "Priming" is an activity that nvcorrd does when a new ruleset
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-04/msg00015.html (16,679 bytes)

266. RE: [NV-L] NvserverdPrimeTecEvents=NO (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:54:21 -0400
James, I must has jumped over this in the reference guide as I did not see this. Sorry about that. There is a wealth of information there. I uncommented NvserverdSendSeverityTecEvents=YES so that we
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-04/msg00016.html (15,598 bytes)

267. Re: [NV-L] Automatic Population of SNMP Conf Table (score: 1)
Author: ss cc <steph_cornish AT yahoo DOT com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
<<< text/html; charset=iso-8859-1: Unrecognized >>> GIF image GIF image _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave AT lists.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-04/msg00017.html (11,310 bytes)

268. RE: [NV-L] NvserverdPrimeTecEvents=NO (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:21:36 -0400
Kevin, When NetView became a part of TEC and bundled with it, the TEC architects got a mandate to apply their best practices to the NetView baroc and rules files. These were altered and started shipp
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-04/msg00018.html (12,257 bytes)

269. [NV-L] Reminder: Please Respond to Ajay's Invitation (score: 1)
Author: Ajay Tewari Tewari <tewari.ajay AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:19:05 -0500
Ajay Tewari Tewari wants you to join Yaari! Is Ajay your friend? Yes, Ajay is my friend! No, Ajay isn't my friend. Please respond or Ajay may think you said no :( Thanks, The Yaari Team ____ If you p
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00000.html (10,853 bytes)

270. [NV-L] NetView trapd.log messages (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:57:13 -0500
Hello, Tue Mar 03 14:42:51 2009 <none> n netmon-related Application disconnecting from trapd. Any idea what is causing this message? Thank you, Kevin Sperry IT Analyst, Data Center Monitoring Control
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00001.html (12,214 bytes)

271. Re: [NV-L] NetView trapd.log messages (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 15:21:38 -0500
Most likely, it is a Demand Poll or similar netmon action initiated by a user from the GUI. This message is part of a trio. Selecting a netmon action like Demand Poll from the GUI causes an event to
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00002.html (15,985 bytes)

272. RE: [NV-L] NetView trapd.log messages (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:00:23 -0500
You are correct, it is from the demand polling. We had two nodes at a remote site report down since 8:30am when a demand poll was conducted at 4:00pm. The interesting part to this is that the nodes s
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00003.html (15,048 bytes)

273. RE: [NV-L] NetView trapd.log messages (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:22:33 -0500
None. Issues like this are best handled in a PMR open to IBM Support. They will want to see your trapd.log and they will probably advise you to run the netmon trace so they can see what netmon is doi
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00004.html (21,286 bytes)

274. RE: [NV-L] NetView trapd.log messages (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:42:44 -0500
Understood. Thank you for all your help. Kevin Sperry IT Analyst, Data Center Monitoring Control ________________________________ None. Issues like this are best handled in a PMR open to IBM Support.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00005.html (17,424 bytes)

275. [NV-L] Events to TEC (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:22:33 -0500
Hello, Using NV 7.15 w/ FP1. We now have a need for NV integration w/ TEC. Another part of our company uses OpenView and TEC. They use scripts to forward events to TEC. I have done some research and
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00006.html (12,395 bytes)

276. Re: [NV-L] Events to TEC (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:53:05 -0500
Well, that depends on how the scripts are implemented. And on what platform, UNIX and Linux or Windows. And on whether you want to forward NetView events or include vendor events too. I think you are
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00007.html (17,768 bytes)

277. [NV-L] SNMP MIB Labels creating issues! (score: 1)
Author: "Senthil Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani AT ust-global DOT com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:41:30 +0530
Hi Team, I observed a peculiar problem in SNMP tree. I just wanted to clarify the same with you experts. In SNMP, if I have one object label named say &#8220;XYZ&#8221; in a MIB and the same label is
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00008.html (14,083 bytes)

278. Re: [NV-L] SNMP MIB Labels creating issues! (score: 1)
Author: Leslie Clark <lclark AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:00:11 -0400
Are you on the right forum, Senny? I thought UPS had migrated to ITNM. Cordially, Leslie A. Clark IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt Information Technology Services Americas IBM Global Services Det
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00009.html (14,830 bytes)

279. [NV-L] for PMR issues send mail to tivoli_support AT ecurep.ibm DOT com with PMR number in Suject line (score: 1)
Author: Franck Mercier <franck.mercier AT fr.ibm DOT com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:01:54 +0100
I will be out of the office starting 09/03/2009 and will not return until 23/03/2009. _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com Unsubscribe:NV-L-l
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00010.html (11,080 bytes)

280. RE: [NV-L] SNMP MIB Labels creating issues! (score: 1)
Author: "Senthil Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani AT ust-global DOT com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:44:55 +0530
Sorry if I confused you! Yes, in fact I am trying to bring the UPS Device under Netview monitoring purview for its load and I come across with the peculiar issue as stated below. Revert me if you nee
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-03/msg00011.html (19,716 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu