Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+NV714\s+\-\s+nvserverd\s+error\s+when\s+trying\s+to\s+send\s+events\s+to\s+TEC\s*$/: 34715 ]

Total 34715 documents matching your query.

241. Re: FW: [NV-L] Unable to register /usr/OV/lrf/netmon.lrf (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 14:32:29 -0400
ovsuf is designed to be read by ovspmd when he starts and stops daemons. It is RO to prevent tampering but if you have root access then you can still write to it, which is why you need root access wh
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-05/msg00006.html (12,360 bytes)

242. RE: FW: [NV-L] Unable to register /usr/OV/lrf/netmon.lrf (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 15:19:23 -0400
Everyone, my apologies, I do have root access and was sudo'd in when launching serversetup. Since I was not making progress with the first error message, I proceeded to remedy the second error messag
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-05/msg00007.html (16,589 bytes)

243. RE: [NV-L] NvserverdPrimeTecEvents=NO (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 08:24:34 -0400
Thanks James, we decided to let TEC perform the escalation after a timed interval. The TEC guy wrote the rule and it appears to be working well. Thank you again, Kevin Sperry IT Analyst, Data Center
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-05/msg00008.html (14,662 bytes)

244. [NV-L] RFI - no color propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 14:07:47 -0400
Hello, With NV 7.1.5 on AIX, I have enabled RFI, netmon -K1 mode. I have read some documentation in the NV manuals and other NV users' email from this site. Is there no way to propagate the white col
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-05/msg00009.html (12,139 bytes)

245. Re: [NV-L] RFI - no color propagation (score: 1)
Author: Leslie Clark <lclark AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 18:59:04 -0400
White means unreachable and it is not my fault. The router causing the problem will be red, or yellow if it is only one interface causing the problem. I would be cautious about messing with this. Pro
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-05/msg00010.html (14,408 bytes)

246. RE: [NV-L] RFI - no color propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 09:02:28 -0400
Good morning, I apologize for such short wording and don't mind the "white" node. After I sent my email yesterday, we witnessed a remote site router go "white" in Netview. All downstream nodes were s
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-05/msg00011.html (18,023 bytes)

247. [NV-L] Some red interfaces cannot test. (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:56:29 -0400
Hello, We are running NV 7.15 FP1 on AIX on both our primary and backup/test servers. I perform a ovtopofix -A and then perform the hotbackup procedure on the primary and then untar the databases on
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-05/msg00012.html (13,144 bytes)

248. RE: [NV-L] Some red interfaces cannot test. (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 11:45:19 -0400
Addl Info: Test options are grayed only on the red symbols. They are present for the green symbols. Thanks, Kevin Sperry IT Analyst, Data Center Monitoring Control nationalgrid 7437 Henry Clay Blvd.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-05/msg00013.html (14,966 bytes)

249. Re: [NV-L] Some red interfaces cannot test. (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:42:40 -0400
If an option is greyed out on the pull-down, then for some reason ovw thinks that option does not apply to that object. Take a look at /usr/OV/registration/demandpoll. At the bottom of the page are t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-05/msg00014.html (17,246 bytes)

250. [NV-L] Mib2trap help (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:09:42 -0400
Hello again, With NetView 7.1.5 on UNIX, trying to run mib2trap on concatenated file. I am receiving the following&#8230; Errors - no script generated. Bad format for OBJECT TYPE(END): On or around l
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-04/msg00000.html (13,685 bytes)

251. Re: [NV-L] Mib2trap help (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:23:19 -0400
Remove RFC 1212 from your concatenation. It is not needed and cannot be parsed any way. Ditto with RFC 1155. These RFC's contain macros which define the basic parts of the MIB tree. And macros cannot
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-04/msg00001.html (17,592 bytes)

252. Re: [NV-L] Mib2trap help (score: 1)
Author: Leslie Clark <lclark AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:49:33 -0400
James, does he have to remove the ^M things from the file? Or are they supported now? This is on AIX, I think. Cordially, Leslie A. Clark IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt Information Technology S
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-04/msg00002.html (18,712 bytes)

253. Re: [NV-L] Mib2trap help (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:25:44 -0400
Good catch, Leslie. I assumed that the ctrl-Ms were the result of ftp'ing the file from UNIX to Windows without using ASCII mode and that the UNIX copy did not have them. But in any case, removing al
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-04/msg00003.html (22,006 bytes)

254. FW: [NV-L] Mib2trap help (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:46:34 -0400
Good Morning, Yes, you are correct, the ctrl-Ms were a result of FTP'ing from WIN to AIX w/o using ACSII mode. I removed RFC-1212 and RFC-1155-SMI, re-concatenated the files and had an error on RFC-1
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-04/msg00004.html (22,680 bytes)

255. Fw: [NV-L] Mib2trap help (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:32:56 -0400
I've truncated this message and re-sent it to avoid it being held up. James Shanks Tivoli Network Availability Management Level Three Network Availability Management Tivoli Software, IBM Corp 1-919-2
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-04/msg00005.html (14,471 bytes)

256. RE: [NV-L] Mib2trap help (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:48:08 -0400
Good morning, I think I need to back up a bit. Before I dig down deeper, I want to verify that I am using the correct MIB. Perhaps I am using the wrong MIB. I was told to use the CISCO-PORT-STORM-CON
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-04/msg00006.html (19,351 bytes)

257. RE: [NV-L] Mib2trap help (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:43:19 -0400
There is no way you can look at a trap and tell what MIB defines it. You can only search a database of MIBs and hope you get lucky. I suggest you open a PMR to Support and get some personal help. The
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-04/msg00007.html (18,475 bytes)

258. [NV-L] NetView event forwarding to TEC (score: 1)
Author: "Sperry, Kevin" <Kevin.Sperry AT us.ngrid DOT com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:38:02 -0400
Hello again, 1. Using UNIX with NetView 7.1.5. Is it recommended to use the "TME transport mechanism" for sending alerts to TEC? 2. We are currently forwarding events in out test environment and have
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-04/msg00008.html (13,973 bytes)

259. Re: [NV-L] NetView event forwarding to TEC (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:50:53 -0400
Kevin, You have a couple of misconceptions here. 1. The TME transport mechanism requires that you have the Tivoli Framework installed on your NetView Machine and NetView installed as a Tivoli applica
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-04/msg00009.html (19,015 bytes)

260. Re: [NV-L] NetView event forwarding to TEC (score: 1)
Author: Gareth Holl <gholl AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:14:19 -0400
Hi Kevin, I conversed with James and we both agree there is a slight correction to the reply for #1 : There was a change made in the later mod levels for NetView v7.1 (7.1.4 and 7.1.5 definitely incl
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2009-04/msg00010.html (21,987 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu