Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+ZFS\s+Filesystem\s+Backups\s+\-\s+Tips\s+and\s+tricks\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+ZFS\s+Filesystem\s+Backups\s+\-\s+Tips\s+and\s+tricks\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Veritas-bu] ZFS Filesystem Backups - Tips and tricks (score: 1): Author: "Mark Glazerman" <Mark.Glazerman AT spartech DOT com>; Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 09:53:26 -0500; Ed, As Phil and myself have proved, there are backup admins out there who have no idea that their ZFS filesystem data is unprotected. Not everyone has the opportunity to test restores and it’s; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2008-08/msg00118.html (19,097 bytes)
22. Re: [Veritas-bu] ZFS Filesystem Backups - Tips and tricks (score: 1): Author: "Ed Wilts" <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org>; Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:11:01 -0500; I agree 100% that as a matter of urgency, Symantec should have distributed the technote much earlier than they did once they identified this issue. I hope that there were not too many other admins wh; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2008-08/msg00119.html (15,253 bytes)
23. Re: [Veritas-bu] ZFS Filesystem Backups - Tips and tricks (score: 1): Author: Karl Rossing <karlr AT barobinson DOT com>; Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 13:59:44 -0500; Symantec, help us understand. Right now, Symantec gives me the impression that "We QA our products and QA is expensive" but nothing more. How are these patches QA'ed exactly? How big is the staff, ho; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2008-08/msg00124.html (14,499 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 23
Page: [1] [2]