Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+LTO\s+Tape\s+Reliability\s*$/: 61631 ]

Total 61631 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.6 for RHEL 7 Linux Kernel 3.0 native client support (score: 1)
Author: Neil Conner <neil AT mbari DOT org>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:15:02 -0700
How do we get this. So far as we can tell despite documentation to the contrary as detailed below we are still only seeing Linux Kernel 2.6 support in our 7.6 installation. We had found technote som
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-04/msg00001.html (15,065 bytes)

42. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.6 for RHEL 7 Linux Kernel 3.0 native client support (score: 1)
Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:11:21 +0000
I&#8217;m not sure what you&#8217;re trying to say. RHEL7 does NOT come with a 2.6 kernel. It comes with a 3.x kernel and that was the reason I was posting. We DID install the 2.6 client because it i
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-04/msg00002.html (19,027 bytes)

43. [Veritas-bu] Changing Windows master to Linux master (score: 1)
Author: bubbwe <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:22:19 -0700
I want to change my windows master to a linux master. Is this doable? I am told by symantec that the catalog directory structure and the block sizes written differ between the 2 and this will require
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-04/msg00003.html (11,730 bytes)

44. Re: [Veritas-bu] Changing Windows master to Linux master (score: 1)
Author: scott.george AT parker DOT com
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 12:29:53 -0400
If it is possible, I would run 2 parallel environments, one being your existing and the other being the new with your linux master. Start backing up to the new and keep the old around until all of yo
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-04/msg00004.html (14,139 bytes)

45. Re: [Veritas-bu] Changing Windows master to Linux master (score: 1)
Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 18:02:58 +0000
When I researched all this about 3 years ago going from UNIX to another UNIX or Linux wasn&#8217;t an issue so long as you kept the same name. Changing host names was a major issue if you wanted to m
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-04/msg00005.html (19,031 bytes)

46. Re: [Veritas-bu] Changing Windows master to Linux master (score: 1)
Author: Dan Pritts <danno AT umich DOT edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:24:21 -0400
scott.george AT parker DOT com April 29, 2015 at 12:29 PM If it is possible, I would run 2 parallel environments, one being your existing and the other being the new with your linux master. Start bac
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-04/msg00006.html (14,117 bytes)

47. Re: [Veritas-bu] Changing Windows master to Linux master (score: 1)
Author: Joe Liston <joeliston AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 18:00:09 -0400
scott.george AT parker DOT com April 29, 2015 at 12:29 PM If it is possible, I would run 2 parallel environments, one being your existing and the other being the new with your linux master.  Start
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-04/msg00007.html (15,289 bytes)

48. [Veritas-bu] New media server showing "Active for Disk" not "Active for Tape and Disk" (score: 1)
Author: "BeDour, Wayne" <WBedour AT lear DOT com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:24:08 +0000
All: I&#8217;m currently running NetBackup 7.6.0.1 on Redhat Linux. I am trying to move one of my media servers to a different host. I want to get everything in place on the new server, point all my
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-03/msg00000.html (14,583 bytes)

49. Re: [Veritas-bu] RV: New media server showing "Active for Disk" not "Active for Tape and Disk" (score: 1)
Author: Víctor Vela López <biqtor AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:48:28 +0100
Hi Wayne,   Try with this:   nbemmcmd -updatehost -machinename <mediaserver <masterserver hostname> (do this if media server is NOT active for tape) nbemmcmd -updatehost -machinename <mediaserver <ma
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-03/msg00001.html (25,593 bytes)

50. Re: [Veritas-bu] RV: New media server showing "Active for Disk" not "Active for Tape and Disk" (score: 1)
Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:51:56 +0000
Run lsscsi and verify the OS is seeing all the tape drives on this media server. Verify you have the shared storage license installed on the media server. We ran into an odd issue here recently in th
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-03/msg00002.html (31,495 bytes)

51. Re: [Veritas-bu] RV: New media server showing "Active for Disk" not "Active for Tape and Disk" (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Jacobson" <SJACOBSO AT novell DOT com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:04:21 -0600
I've had to run this command before, once done its updates EMM, it sticks, and you shouldn't see the problem again. >>> Víctor Vela López <biqtor AT gmail DOT com> 3/16/2015 7:48 AM >>> Hi Wayne, Try
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-03/msg00003.html (24,634 bytes)

52. [Veritas-bu] What's LiveUpdate like these days? (score: 1)
Author: Dean <dean.deano AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:18:07 +1100
Hello folks, I've never used LiveUpdate, partly because I've never had to do a mass update of many hosts, and partly because of some negative comments about it on this mailing list. But my current en
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-02/msg00000.html (12,139 bytes)

53. Re: [Veritas-bu] What's LiveUpdate like these days? (score: 1)
Author: Wayne T Smith <WTSmith AT maine DOT edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:44:34 -0500
I'd retire. Cheers, Wayne On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Dean <dean.deano AT gmail DOT com> wrote: Hello folks, I've never used LiveUpdate, partly because I've never had to do a mass update of many
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-02/msg00001.html (13,712 bytes)

54. Re: [Veritas-bu] What's LiveUpdate like these days? (score: 1)
Author: Neil Conner <neil AT mbari DOT org>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:18:07 -0800
Hi Dean, If the master is running a Unix/Linux variant, the simplest and most reliable method to update Unix/Linux clients is to run the update_clients script. Run it once to build a list of updateab
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-02/msg00002.html (16,407 bytes)

55. Re: [Veritas-bu] What's LiveUpdate like these days? (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, Jonathan" <JMARTI05 AT intersil DOT com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:20:22 +0000
If your clients are Windows based, I would use psexec to remotely push an msiexec command. Msiexec includes switches to suppress the reboot if required. I don't have the software in front of me, but
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-02/msg00003.html (17,552 bytes)

56. Re: [Veritas-bu] What's LiveUpdate like these days? (score: 1)
Author: Dean <dean.deano AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:53:47 +1100
Thanks everyone. I'm meeting with the client today, so will see what they think. Cheers Dean On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Martin, Jonathan <JMARTI05 AT intersil DOT com> wrote: If your clients ar
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-02/msg00004.html (18,701 bytes)

57. Re: [Veritas-bu] What's LiveUpdate like these days? (score: 1)
Author: Simon Weaver <Simon.Weaver AT iscl DOT net>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:59:45 +0000
We block PSEXEC due to security reasons. I recently updated 250 clients myself took 3 days, and in some cases was able to push out from a remote installation. (where there was disk space). From: veri
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-02/msg00005.html (20,505 bytes)

58. [Veritas-bu] backup exec 2010 and error v-275-636 (score: 1)
Author: davecason <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 12:31:37 -0800
Hi Gang, I've erased all my LTO4 media and moved it in to scratch media - created new backup jobs and I've told them to run. They're all happy except for one, one job keeps queuing and I get an alert
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-02/msg00006.html (11,850 bytes)

59. [Veritas-bu] Media Servers needed (score: 1)
Author: Dbowlby <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 07:01:20 -0800
I backup weekly 416tb of data............ My backup window starts daily 4:30 till 4:30 am for incrementals FULL Backups 4:30 friday till 8:00 sunday, sunday is for slp duplications, and datadomain cl
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-02/msg00007.html (11,462 bytes)

60. [Veritas-bu] Ideal Netbackup solution for backing up millions of files (score: 1)
Author: Dbowlby <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 06:50:49 -0800
This probably isnt ideal for you or your situation but this is how i handled this problem in my environment. I never tried using flashbackup for these servers. We have 2 Major File servers, 1 is 1.6
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-02/msg00008.html (12,222 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu