Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Command\s+line\s+restores\s+from\s+a\s+specific\s+backup\s+image\?\s*$/: 61631 ]

Total 61631 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 104, Issue 3 (score: 1)
Author: Paul McCabe <pmccabe AT wi.mit DOT edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:28:32 -0500 (EST)
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-12/msg00009.html (14,054 bytes)

82. [Veritas-bu] Mystery Catalog job appearing, running... (score: 1)
Author: e070924 <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 09:53:59 -0800
To confirm, the 2 jobs that are running are bona-fide, and valid. On my 7.5 server, then both run, and write to the same tape. On my 7.1 server, about 60% of the time, they run, but are put on sepera
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00000.html (11,774 bytes)

83. Re: [Veritas-bu] Mystery Catalog job appearing, running... (score: 1)
Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 18:11:16 +0000
Do both jobs have the same retention level set? i.e. Do they have the same expiration length? Typically different RLs will go to different tapes. To confirm, the 2 jobs that are running are bona-fide
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00001.html (13,846 bytes)

84. [Veritas-bu] Mystery Catalog job appearing, running... (score: 1)
Author: e070924 <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 11:34:13 -0800
Thanks for posting.. It's weird that I can't answer that question. There's only one catalog job that runs, and it is of type "NBU-Catalog". The other job that runs, that is of type "Sybase" is the my
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00002.html (12,277 bytes)

85. Re: [Veritas-bu] Mystery Catalog job appearing, running... (score: 1)
Author: "Preston, Douglas" <dlpreston AT lereta DOT com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 12:22:33 -0800
Look all through your vaulting and or catalog backup for selections. Thanks for posting.. It's weird that I can't answer that question. There's only one catalog job that runs, and it is of type "NBU-
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00003.html (13,153 bytes)

86. [Veritas-bu] Mystery Catalog job appearing, running... (score: 1)
Author: e070924 <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:22:30 -0800
We've been all through the settings of the Catalog job, and compared it to the 7.1 server which is doing fine. No differences. that's the first thing we checked. No where does it say that it's going
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00004.html (12,645 bytes)

87. Re: [Veritas-bu] Mystery Catalog job appearing, running... (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Jacobson" <SJACOBSO AT novell DOT com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:28:30 -0700
I've seen this (not necessarily with catalog backups) before and Tech Support recommended to create (not copy) to a new policy. Each time I've needed to do this it has worked. >>> e070924 <nbu-forum
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00005.html (13,415 bytes)

88. [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Appliance Vs Data Domain (score: 1)
Author: saiyed123 <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 07:10:33 -0800
Our company is considering NBU for backup solution using backup appliance, our environment is mainly VMWARE ( 800+ guest) 30 + ESX and 30+Solaris boxes. We also need Exchange backups to improve and k
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00006.html (12,844 bytes)

89. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Appliance Vs Data Domain (score: 1)
Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 21:51:41 +0000
We backup to Data Domain and to Quantums DXi over NFS from NetBackup 7.1. Other than the fact they're now owned by EMC I have a generally favorable opinion of Data Domain. We've been using it for a f
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00007.html (15,046 bytes)

90. [Veritas-bu] Mystery Catalog job appearing, running... (score: 1)
Author: srl_simon <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:45:18 -0800
How big is your catalog? (In 7.5 the NBDB part is bigger as it contains the metadata) What type of tapes are you using? Are tapes changed daily? When tapes are used are they empty or are they being a
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00008.html (12,828 bytes)

91. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Appliance Vs Data Domain (score: 1)
Author: Mikhail Nikitin <mikhail.nikitin AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 09:16:38 +1100
Couple of things to consider. NBU Appliance is a media server plus a dedupe pool so it can do offhost VMware backups over SAN whereas OST Appliances need a media server. Some additional features like
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00009.html (14,490 bytes)

92. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Appliance Vs Data Domain (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Jacobson" <SJACOBSO AT novell DOT com>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 11:47:45 -0700
You'll likely receive many responses to your inquire so I add mine as well. In my research with DD and Quantum is that they were all compatible pieces to create the solution your seeking, however, th
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00010.html (17,264 bytes)

93. [Veritas-bu] Automatyczne: Jaroslaw Duda/DNS-Polska/PL is out of the office. (powrót 21-11-2014) (score: 1)
Author: Jaroslaw.Duda AT arrowecs DOT pl
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 20:06:00 +0100
Nie ma mnie w pracy do 21-11-2014. W dniach 16-21.11.2014 jestem w delegacji z ograniczonym dostpem do poczty. Uwaga: To jest odpowied automatyczna na wiadomo od uytkownika "Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 10
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00011.html (11,396 bytes)

94. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Appliance Vs Data Domain (score: 1)
Author: scott.george AT parker DOT com
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:02:34 -0500
We have had a chance to side-by-side a 5220 with a DD860 for the past couple of years and each has its high and low points. Most of that time we didn't have a backup replication solution in place and
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00012.html (22,085 bytes)

95. [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Appliance Vs Data Domain (score: 1)
Author: saiyed123 <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:15:25 -0800
I appreciate all the posts and opinions, i welcome some more as the information is valuable in making the decision, i am bit concerned about performance and reliability ( as mentioned by Scott) so ho
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00013.html (12,241 bytes)

96. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Appliance Vs Data Domain (score: 1)
Author: Christopher Costa <ccosta.ccc AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:08:19 -0500
The 5220 appliance RAID card was powered by a battery and the battery went bad on them sometimes. Since the 5230 the RAID card is capacity and we have had zero problems since then. The 5230 with the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00014.html (13,715 bytes)

97. [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel (score: 1)
Author: richarn <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:09:14 -0800
I am trying to use the Netbackup Administration Console as I believe it has certain advantages over the jnbSA jave interface. There are fire walls between my Windows machine where I want to run Admin
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00015.html (12,816 bytes)

98. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel (score: 1)
Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 16:01:46 +0000
When you say "NetBackup Administration Console" exactly what command are you running? The jnbSA can actually be started from UNIX/Linux but since it is Java is sending an X window to you. If the cons
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00016.html (14,806 bytes)

99. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel (score: 1)
Author: "Stier, Matthew" <Matthew.Stier AT us.fujitsu DOT com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 17:55:54 +0000
And if you're going to do that, try 'MobaXterm'. --Original Message-- From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Lig
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00017.html (15,721 bytes)

100. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Appliance Vs Data Domain (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Jacobson" <SJACOBSO AT novell DOT com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:40:28 -0700
Just for clarification. My e-mail post was with regards to the 5230 model and not the 5220 though I did my POC with a 5220. The 5230 is leaps and bounds a complete and different generation than the 5
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00018.html (13,363 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu