Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Command\s+line\s+restores\s+from\s+a\s+specific\s+backup\s+image\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Command\s+line\s+restores\s+from\s+a\s+specific\s+backup\s+image\?\s*$/: 61631 ]

Total 61631 documents matching your query.

361. Re: [Veritas-bu] How to know biggest client backup ? (score: 1): Author: Anurag Sharma <sharma.anurag AT hotmail DOT com>; Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 19:31:30 +0530; Awesome Anatoly Let me try and get back to you. Anurag > Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:03:06 +0400 > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] How to know biggest client backup ? > From: matorola AT gmail DOT com _____; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00067.html (15,908 bytes)
362. Re: [Veritas-bu] How to know biggest client backup ? (score: 1): Author: Harpreet <harpreetrajan AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 22:16:59 +0800; Awesome Anatoly Let me try and get back to you. Anurag > Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:03:06 +0400 > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] How to know biggest client backup ? > From: matorola AT gmail DOT com _____; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00068.html (16,213 bytes)
363. Re: [Veritas-bu] 100% disk to disk (score: 1): Author: Harpreet Singh Chana <harpreetrajan AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 11:44:25 +0800; Hi All, I have a small question. How to protect the data deletion from disk ? (accidently in case some one run the bpexpdate XXXX_backup_ID command) With Regards Harpreet Singh On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-10/msg00000.html (15,597 bytes)
364. Re: [Veritas-bu] 100% disk to disk (score: 1): Author: Nikos Apostolou <nia AT pronet DOT ms>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 07:01:31 +0000; Good question… In our case where we use DataDomain and VTL drives, when you run the bpexpdate the only thing happens is that the images on tape are marked as expired. The files (or the tape) wi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-10/msg00001.html (20,184 bytes)
365. Re: [Veritas-bu] 100% disk to disk (score: 1): Author: <smpt1 AT peppas DOT gr>; Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 11:38:47 +0300; This is normal behavior for a VTL. If you need to free up VTL space you have to write a script that labels the empty tapes. You can do that ones a wile by labeling all virtual tapes it the scratch po; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-10/msg00002.html (19,130 bytes)
366. Re: [Veritas-bu] Archive options (score: 1): Author: Dwayne Adams <dc_adamsjr AT hotmail DOT com>; Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:37:22 -0700; Hello, Do you archive data for long periods of time (think 7 to 18 years)? If so, please share your experience in long term backup platform independent archiving solutions you are using or have consi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-10/msg00003.html (11,683 bytes)
367. [Veritas-bu] Media ID not UNIQUE in DataBase (34) (score: 1): Author: jtwemlow <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 06:41:08 -0700; Hi, whilst the barcodes are 8 characters long, NetBackup uses just 6 characters as its media ID. So tape GJW998L4 has a media id of W998L4 and tape LXW998L4 will also have the media id of W998L4. Whe; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-10/msg00004.html (11,869 bytes)
368. Re: [Veritas-bu] Media ID not UNIQUE in DataBase (34) (score: 1): Author: Dan Pritts <danno AT umich DOT edu>; Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:29:16 -0400; Another option is to just print your own barcode labels. I use GNU barcode to generate the labels, as described here: http://community.spiceworks.com/how_to/show/36086-creating-your-own-lto-labels It; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-10/msg00005.html (16,050 bytes)
369. [Veritas-bu] Clustered Master Server issues with 7.5.0.4 and Solaris 10 (score: 1): Author: tburrell <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:31:13 -0700; "The cluster in question is still running backups, but there are a lot of unprocessed changes to the tape drives and libraries I want to clean up- but I can't get the Device WIzard to work- in fact n; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-10/msg00006.html (11,945 bytes)
370. Re: [Veritas-bu] Clustered Master Server issues with 7.5.0.4 and Solaris 10 (score: 1): Author: "Valenze, Chris" <chris AT batechp DOT com>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 19:31:18 -0400; After a cluster failover/failback, the Windows admin console now works with all device management pieces. Java GUI is still broken, but I at least have a workaround to clean up my devices. +-- +-- _; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-10/msg00007.html (13,633 bytes)
371. Re: [Veritas-bu] Clustered Master Server issues with 7.5.0.4 and Solaris 10 (score: 1): Author: <smpt1 AT peppas DOT gr>; Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:44:02 +0300; If your environment is not big, you can clear all devices and rerun the wizard from the scratch. Run the command “nbemmcmd –deletalldevices –machinename ….” From: verita; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-10/msg00008.html (15,000 bytes)
372. [Veritas-bu] netbackup media-server -> master-server (score: 1): Author: shoodlum <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 08:53:31 -0700; All I have the following setup location 1 media server master server -- location 2 media server the locations are connected with a fast network connection but every-once-in-a-while I have a network c; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-09/msg00000.html (11,123 bytes)
373. Re: [Veritas-bu] netbackup media-server -> master-server (score: 1): Author: Girish Jorapurkar <girishsj AT yahoo DOT com>; Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 18:34:08 -0700 (PDT); NB 7.5 Resilient Network feature may help in your case: http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH183552 From: shoodlum <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com> To: VERITAS-BU AT; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-09/msg00001.html (14,157 bytes)
374. [Veritas-bu] netbackup media-server -> master-server (score: 1): Author: shoodlum <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 08:22:41 -0700; thanks for your time I will look into this -Steve +-- +-- _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-09/msg00002.html (11,237 bytes)
375. [Veritas-bu] First backup job (score: 1): Author: shoodlum <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 08:39:41 -0700; AllI have 2 backup jobs(schedules) for a policy Daily Weekly I'm using SLPs to "override policy storage selection" to use the different tape pools per job So my question When running a backup job for; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-09/msg00003.html (11,155 bytes)
376. Re: [Veritas-bu] First backup job (score: 1): Author: <smpt1 AT peppas DOT gr>; Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 19:15:10 +0300; Hello, If the weekly schedule is calendar based AND you had select the "retries allowed after run day", netbackup will run the Weekly schedule. Else, Netbackup the first time will run a Full backup u; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-09/msg00004.html (12,205 bytes)
377. [Veritas-bu] Problems after upgrading OpsCenter to 7.5.0.6 (score: 1): Author: kev_lamb <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 06:47:33 -0700; Been on 7.5.0.6 fro a while now with OC and not seen any issues with any of my reports at all... +-- +-- _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.en; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-09/msg00005.html (10,849 bytes)
378. [Veritas-bu] NBU 7.5.0.6 (score: 1): Author: kev_lamb <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 06:49:13 -0700; Been running 7.5.0.6 on my Master and Media servers (RHEL) for over a month now and so far not seen any performance hits or new failures +-- +-- _______________________________________________ Verita; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-09/msg00006.html (10,755 bytes)
379. [Veritas-bu] User permission in Netbackup. (score: 1): Author: kev_lamb <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 06:54:05 -0700; Did not think you could have just read access the the Activity monitor but this is how I would set it up in the auth.conf file: user ADMIN=AM In order for a nonroot user to modify the files that the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-09/msg00007.html (11,194 bytes)
380. [Veritas-bu] library/netbackup loses track of tapes after adding isilon ndmp client; recommended version (score: 1): Author: Dan Pritts <danno AT umich DOT edu>; Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 11:32:17 -0400; Hi, I've got an existing system that's been running reliably for several years; the clients are EMC Celerra NASes backing up via NDMP. I'm running netbackup 7.0 (far as i can tell, no patches have be; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-09/msg00008.html (12,712 bytes)

Current List: 361 - 380
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]