Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Command\s+line\s+restores\s+from\s+a\s+specific\s+backup\s+image\?\s*$/: 61631 ]

Total 61631 documents matching your query.

341. Re: [Veritas-bu] ESL Poor LAN Performance (score: 1)
Author: Len Boyle <Len.Boyle AT sas DOT com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:40:41 +0000
Simon, What is the os on the media server. Are both the lto4 and the lto5 using the same drivers. The same hba&#8217;s. If the same make and model are the configs the same. Can you mount a tape on th
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00047.html (18,275 bytes)

342. Re: [Veritas-bu] ESL Poor LAN Performance (score: 1)
Author: Rusty Major <rusty.major AT sungard DOT com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:41:18 -0600
I am referring to doing a backup over the Local Area Network to either the LTO4 or LTO5 drive via a Media Server. The only thing SAN Attached is the Media Server to the LTO4 and LTO5 library. One cl
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00048.html (27,570 bytes)

343. Re: [Veritas-bu] ESL Poor LAN Performance (score: 1)
Author: Bluejay Adametz <bluejay AT fujifilm DOT com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:00:43 -0500
Someone check my math, but 100gb in 2 hours, 50gb/hour, 853mb/hour, or 14mb/sec. I wonder if the LTO4 is able to slow down to match that rate, while that knocks the LTO5 out of streaming? What sort
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00049.html (13,524 bytes)

344. Re: [Veritas-bu] ESL Poor LAN Performance (score: 1)
Author: Simon Weaver <Simon.Weaver AT iscl DOT net>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 18:44:43 +0000
The Data is millions upon millions on 2-5kb files. So from a Network point, it is just about acceptable. It would be a SAN Media Server or Client if they paid for it! The estimate I gave, wasn't even
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00050.html (14,886 bytes)

345. Re: [Veritas-bu] ESL Poor LAN Performance (score: 1)
Author: Simon Weaver <Simon.Weaver AT iscl DOT net>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 18:47:03 +0000
Hi Len Win2k8 R2 &#8211; If it backs up itself, it&#8217;s very fast, so that is fine. Certainly from a SAN point, everything is fine. I am going to present the LTO5 Library to another SAN Media Serv
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00051.html (20,738 bytes)

346. Re: [Veritas-bu] ESL Poor LAN Performance (score: 1)
Author: Simon Weaver <Simon.Weaver AT iscl DOT net>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 18:49:08 +0000
There are other devices on the SAN Switch, but our SAN Admin see no high usage or no excessive dropouts or issues when doing backups to the media server itself. The Library is in a different location
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00052.html (35,232 bytes)

347. [Veritas-bu] ESL Poor LAN Performance (score: 1)
Author: mstoller <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:12:06 -0800
With a 10x performance difference between backing up to the LTO4 drives and the LTO5 drives, I'd suggest checking the fibre path from the server to the tape drive in the LTO4 library and comparing it
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00053.html (12,979 bytes)

348. [Veritas-bu] Incremental filesystem backups running like a full backup (score: 1)
Author: mdglazerman <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:12:10 -0800
I am attempting to backup the contents of a remotely mounted filesystem. This filesystem is currently mounted on one of our linux master servers via CIFS. There is approximately 2.3TB's of data on th
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00054.html (12,893 bytes)

349. Re: [Veritas-bu] Incremental filesystem backups running like a full backup (score: 1)
Author: Patrick <netbackup AT whelan-consulting.co DOT uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 20:41:24 +0000
Try this: USE_CTIME_FOR_INCREMENTALS bp.conf entry for UNIX clients The USE_CTIME_FOR_INCREMENTALS entry changes how NetBackup determines whether or not a file has changed. This entry causes the clie
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00055.html (14,647 bytes)

350. [Veritas-bu] Incremental filesystem backups running like a full backup (score: 1)
Author: mdglazerman <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 13:16:33 -0800
Thanks Pat, I will look at this a little more but it seems like this may be the answer. I have one more question based on this information. As this remote share is mounted on a linux server which is
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00056.html (12,199 bytes)

351. Re: [Veritas-bu] Incremental filesystem backups running like a full backup (score: 1)
Author: Patrick <netbackup AT whelan-consulting.co DOT uk>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 05:48:25 +0000
I think mounting it on a media server would be a better option. Try to keep as much off the master server as possible. _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00057.html (13,138 bytes)

352. [Veritas-bu] Best Practice - Policies vs Volume Pools - Tape Usage (score: 1)
Author: SymTerry <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:58:26 -0800
As rusman and tsimerson have pointed out it really depends on your NetBackup setup. NetBackup organizes tapes by the pool you put them in and the image retention you set for a backup. You most likely
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00058.html (12,603 bytes)

353. Re: [Veritas-bu] ESL Poor LAN Performance (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Jacobson" <SJACOBSO AT novell DOT com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:17:52 -0700
A completely different thought (based on the "millions" of files mentioned earlier): - Do your LTO5 drive support some type of variable speed matching, if so, I'm wondering if the drive is waiting fo
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00059.html (14,325 bytes)

354. Re: [Veritas-bu] ESL Poor LAN Performance (score: 1)
Author: Rusty Major <rusty.major AT sungard DOT com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:21:07 -0600
A completely different thought (based on the "millions" of files mentioned earlier): - Do your LTO5 drive support some type of variable speed matching, if so, I'm wondering if the drive is waiting f
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00060.html (16,992 bytes)

355. [Veritas-bu] Catalog Backups Now Displaying Kbytes Incorrectly (score: 1)
Author: Ron Jack <rjack AT mcclatchy DOT com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:56:08 -0500
All, We're running a single solaris 9 server, with NBU 6.5 (yes, still). My catalog backups recently started reporting really large numbers of kilobytes. In the example below, the last of the comma d
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00061.html (12,955 bytes)

356. [Veritas-bu] How to know biggest client backup ? (score: 1)
Author: Anurag Sharma <sharma.anurag AT hotmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:25:49 +0530
Hi All, My query is simple, I have backups going to VTL then duplicated to tape. Now VTL is filling up badly and need to move some of backups directly to the tapes. Could any one tell me the easiest
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00062.html (12,221 bytes)

357. Re: [Veritas-bu] How to know biggest client backup ? (score: 1)
Author: Anurag Sharma <sharma.anurag AT hotmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 10:36:55 +0530
Any other opinions please ? From: sharma.anurag AT hotmail DOT com To: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu; veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:25:49 +0530
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00063.html (12,642 bytes)

358. Re: [Veritas-bu] How to know biggest client backup ? (score: 1)
Author: Anatoly Pugachev <matorola AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:03:06 +0400
Anurag, 1) install opscenter and use included functionality for reporting 2) use NBU command line, [root@nbu7 ~]# bpdbjobs -report -gdm 25,17,3,1,,,,,1385714991,0000000001,1385714992,,,,,nbu7,,,0 24,
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00064.html (12,659 bytes)

359. Re: [Veritas-bu] How to know biggest client backup ? (score: 1)
Author: Anurag Sharma <sharma.anurag AT hotmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 16:31:37 +0530
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00065.html (13,385 bytes)

360. Re: [Veritas-bu] How to know biggest client backup ? (score: 1)
Author: Harpreet Singh Chana <harpreetrajan AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 20:56:44 +0800
Awesome Anatoly Let me try and get back to you. Anurag > Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:03:06 +0400 > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] How to know biggest client backup ? > From: matorola AT gmail DOT com _____
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2013-11/msg00066.html (15,403 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu