Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Command\s+line\s+restores\s+from\s+a\s+specific\s+backup\s+image\?\s*$/: 61631 ]

Total 61631 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Veritas-bu] older version issue.... netbackup 6.5.6 (score: 1)
Author: Sid Shapiro <sid_shapiro AT bio-rad DOT com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 08:25:14 -0700
Thanks - I'll look into EBU. NetApp can generally do snapshots, but (1) we were trying to move as much as we could to rman, (2) our current snapshot procedure is pretty cumbersome and I expected it t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-07/msg00020.html (17,534 bytes)

22. [Veritas-bu] Upgrading a Windows 2003 Media Server to RedHat Linux, any potential problems? (score: 1)
Author: "BeDour, Wayne" <WBedour AT lear DOT com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 10:34:02 +0000
I&#8217;m currently running NetBackup 7.6.0.1 on Redhat Linux. We have an old Windows 2003 media server at a remote site that we are upgrading to RedHat Linux. Are there any issues related to going f
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-07/msg00021.html (13,065 bytes)

23. Re: [Veritas-bu] Upgrading a Windows 2003 Media Server to RedHat Linux, any potential problems? (score: 1)
Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:03:14 +0000
By convert I assume you mean reinstall. We did that to a Windows media server last year because we had issues getting the shares from our dedupe appliances to work there cleanly. On the reinstall we
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-07/msg00022.html (20,101 bytes)

24. Re: [Veritas-bu] Upgrading a Windows 2003 Media Server to RedHat Linux, any potential problems? (score: 1)
Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:37:10 +0000
I just confirmed with the admin that worked on the project here that he did in fact do the nbdecommission on the Windows media server at the time he did the project. From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailm
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-07/msg00023.html (22,042 bytes)

25. [Veritas-bu] older version issue.... netbackup 6.5.6 (score: 1)
Author: sshapiro <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 11:15:18 -0700
Only got one emailed reply to this - suggested EBU. Not an option. Our DBAs have no interested in trying to set up yet another unsupported system. I resolved this by avoidance, in case anyone is inte
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-07/msg00024.html (12,050 bytes)

26. Re: [Veritas-bu] older version issue.... netbackup 6.5.6 (score: 1)
Author: "nbuser" <nbuser AT rediffmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 04:17:09 -0500
Hi thanks for sharing your experience. Can you please paste output of bp.start and bp.end scripts. It will help us understand better. From: "sshapiro"nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com Sent:Tue, 28 J
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-07/msg00025.html (14,804 bytes)

27. Re: [Veritas-bu] older version issue.... netbackup 6.5.6 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Graff Andersen <mian71 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 11:15:50 +0200
sshapiro currious why you are running a database that is about ten years out of support, especially if your DBAs do not want to use the tools native to that version.   Glad you got your problem solve
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-07/msg00026.html (13,785 bytes)

28. [Veritas-bu] FW: older version issue.... netbackup 6.5.6 (score: 1)
Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 12:32:21 +0000
Below is the original response I sent previously. Today you indicated you only got one response about EBU but I sent this one and at least one other person responded. From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mail
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-07/msg00027.html (27,625 bytes)

29. [Veritas-bu] older version issue.... netbackup 6.5.6 (score: 1)
Author: sshapiro <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:50:14 -0700
I asked "you" not to ask! (business reasons for not upgrading the old database, and the DBAs, although they do their best to support an unsupported database, have no desire to inject yet another unsu
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-07/msg00028.html (12,567 bytes)

30. Re: [Veritas-bu] older version issue.... netbackup 6.5.6 (score: 1)
Author: Wayne T Smith <WTSmith AT maine DOT edu>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 14:35:05 -0400
Congrats on testing!  As you found, it is important to also get the archive redo logs post-backup. Cheers, Wayne _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT ma
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-07/msg00029.html (11,731 bytes)

31. [Veritas-bu] How can I get a count of tapes that have a retention of more than 1 year? (score: 1)
Author: "BeDour, Wayne" <WBedour AT lear DOT com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:44:50 +0000
I&#8217;m currently running NetBackup 7.6.0.1 on Redhat Linux. I admit, I&#8217;m taking the quick easy way out on this but I need an answer kind of quick. Is there a way I can get a count of tapes t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-07/msg00030.html (13,050 bytes)

32. Re: [Veritas-bu] How can I get a count of tapes that have a retention of more than 1 year? (score: 1)
Author: Joe Liston <joeliston AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:23:46 -0400
Im currently running NetBackup 7.6.0.1 on Redhat Linux.  I admit, Im taking the quick easy way out on this but I need an answer kind of quick.  Is there a way I can get a count of tapes that have a
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-07/msg00031.html (14,566 bytes)

33. Re: [Veritas-bu] How can I get a count of tapes that have a retention of more than 1 year? (score: 1)
Author: "nbuser" <nbuser AT rediffmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 23:58:21 -0500
Im currently running NetBackup 7.6.0.1 on Redhat Linux. I admit, Im taking the quick easy way out on this but I need an answer kind of quick. Is there a way I can get a count of tapes that have a re
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-07/msg00032.html (14,566 bytes)

34. Re: [Veritas-bu] How can I get a count of tapes that have a retention of more than 1 year? (score: 1)
Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 13:59:21 +0000
bpmedialist U gives 2 lines of output for each tape. Based on the hint however I found bpmedialist l gives a single line and wrote the following script. If you cut and paste it into a file on your RH
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-07/msg00033.html (32,297 bytes)

35. [Veritas-bu] How do I schedule a backup to run every 4 hours? (score: 1)
Author: "BeDour, Wayne" <WBedour AT lear DOT com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 13:49:56 +0000
I&#8217;m currently running NetBackup 7.6.0.1 on Redhat Linux. Is there a way schedule a backup schedule to run multiple times a day or do I have to create multiple schedules with different start tim
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-06/msg00000.html (12,115 bytes)

36. Re: [Veritas-bu] How do I schedule a backup to run every 4 hours? (score: 1)
Author: "BeDour, Wayne" <WBedour AT lear DOT com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 14:11:54 +0000
Never mind, I&#8217;m gotten so used to Calendar based backups I forgot about the old Frequency method&#8230;.. Wayne BeDour Unix System Administrator PH: 248-447-1739 Internet: wbedour AT lear DOT c
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-06/msg00001.html (13,825 bytes)

37. Re: [Veritas-bu] How do I schedule a backup to run every 4 hours? (score: 1)
Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 14:12:22 +0000
In the schedule itself there is a frequency definition. I havent done it but I assume if you allow it to run all day and set the frequency to 4 hours it would do multiple backups. Note that the 4 hou
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-06/msg00002.html (18,206 bytes)

38. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.6 for RHEL 7 Linux Kernel 3.0 native client support - RESOLVED (score: 1)
Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:52:42 +0000
As a follow up note on all this. On a recent RHEL7.1 install (still running a 3.x kernel) I was able to install the RHEL 2.6 kernel client from NBU 7.6 installation media WITHOUT needing the uname26
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-06/msg00003.html (23,995 bytes)

39. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.6 for RHEL 7 Linux Kernel 3.0 native client support (score: 1)
Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 20:46:53 +0000
My apologies to Neil Conner. I realize on looking at this again today that he was trying to point out the compatibility matrix still shows use of the RHEL 2.6 client package for RHEL7.1 even for NBU
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-05/msg00000.html (21,025 bytes)

40. [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.6 for RHEL 7 Linux Kernel 3.0 native client support (score: 1)
Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:29:05 +0000
How do we get this. So far as we can tell despite documentation to the contrary as detailed below we are still only seeing Linux Kernel 2.6 support in our 7.6 installation. We had found technote some
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2015-04/msg00000.html (13,702 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu