Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Command\s+line\s+restores\s+from\s+a\s+specific\s+backup\s+image\?\s*$/: 61631 ]

Total 61631 documents matching your query.

101. [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel (score: 1)
Author: richarn <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:13:11 -0800
Jeff . Thanks for your reply. The Netbackup Administration Console I am trying to get to work is the one this you can install on a windows machine. It is run from the start menu in windows. I am o.k
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00019.html (13,349 bytes)

102. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel (score: 1)
Author: "netbackup AT whelan-consulting.co DOT uk" <netbackup AT whelan-consulting.co DOT uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 09:54:46 +0000 (GMT)
Hi,   Please forgive my confusion, but what does putty and the windows admin console have to do with each other. You can use putty to login to the master then use the jnbSA to initiate an X display.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00020.html (14,918 bytes)

103. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel (score: 1)
Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 13:32:57 +0000
Thats correct. If you want the Windows GUI you simply install it on your Windows workstation so PuTTY isnt involved. The GUI you see using that and the jnbSA are essentially the same with the differe
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00021.html (17,975 bytes)

104. [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel (score: 1)
Author: tsimerson <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 06:43:43 -0800
With NBU 7.1, the Java console and native Windows console are pretty much the same. Prior to that, there was a huge difference in functionality. The only real difference between the two is that when
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00022.html (13,187 bytes)

105. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel (score: 1)
Author: Dan Pritts <danno AT umich DOT edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 11:28:54 -0500
He wants to use Putty to make an SSH tunnel between his PC and his server.  He then wants the Windows GUI to use the SSH tunnel rather than connecting directly to the server.  This way he does not ha
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00023.html (29,908 bytes)

106. [Veritas-bu] Fwd: RE: Netbackup Administration Console via putty tunnel (score: 1)
Author: Dan Pritts <danno AT umich DOT edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 13:29:12 -0500
I'm sure Jeff intended this message for the list: From: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com> Date: November 24, 2014 at 1:25 PM To: Dan Pritts <danno AT umich DOT edu> Subject: [Veritas
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-11/msg00024.html (15,257 bytes)

107. [Veritas-bu] Deduplication with OST (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, Jonathan" <JMARTI05 AT intersil DOT com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:24:45 +0000
All, We are currently running 7.5 on Windows and looking to add deduplication appliances as a backup target. Ideally, we would purchase the DPOO (OST/AIR) license to keep track of the images as they
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-10/msg00000.html (11,864 bytes)

108. Re: [Veritas-bu] Deduplication with OST (score: 1)
Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:28:41 +0000
We never got OST license here but use Deduplication. We do it using 10 GB Ethernet NFS mounts from the Dedupe appliances on each of our master and media servers. It may not be cheaper in the long run
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-10/msg00001.html (14,684 bytes)

109. Re: [Veritas-bu] Deduplication with OST (score: 1)
Author: "Bahnmiller, Bryan E." <bbahnmiller AT dtcc DOT com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:05:40 +0000
We are currently running 10 GbE from our Linux backup servers to the dedupe appliances. The dedupe appliance vendor does charge a significant price for their OST compatible license/plugin. It is a on
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-10/msg00002.html (18,013 bytes)

110. Re: [Veritas-bu] Deduplication with OST (score: 1)
Author: William Brown <william.d.brown AT gsk DOT com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 16:25:44 +0000
Using a 'basic disk' on a dedupe appliance would be fairly simple and limit the licences required. However check the small print, NetBackup used to require a higher type of licence to store data on a
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-10/msg00003.html (20,401 bytes)

111. Re: [Veritas-bu] Deduplication with OST (score: 1)
Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 16:53:48 +0000
A month or so ago we were actually trying to do CIFS on a Windows Media server using basic disk from dedupe but never got it really going. Ultimately we gave up on the CIFS setup and converted the me
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-10/msg00004.html (21,559 bytes)

112. [Veritas-bu] Mystery Catalog job appearing, running... (score: 1)
Author: e070924 <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:24:16 -0700
My first post -- glad to be here! I have NetBackup 7.1 running on WindowsServer 2008. I have a Catalog job set to run at 10a on business-days, (Policy=Catalog Policy-Type=NBU-Catalog Schedule-Type=Fu
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-10/msg00005.html (11,842 bytes)

113. Re: [Veritas-bu] Mystery Catalog job appearing, running... (score: 1)
Author: William Brown <william.d.brown AT gsk DOT com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 19:30:19 +0000
Well the NetBackup database IS Sybase, so it runs a Sybase backup but it should go to disk flat files, which are then picked up by the tape backup job. Check the streams that the Catalog job breaks d
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-10/msg00006.html (13,270 bytes)

114. [Veritas-bu] Mystery Catalog job appearing, running... (score: 1)
Author: e070924 <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:37:43 -0700
I have new info from more investigations done this morning. We have a netBackup 7.5 server that's acting just fine. We compared the two. The NBU-Catalog backup and the Sybase backup are both being pu
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-10/msg00007.html (11,117 bytes)

115. [Veritas-bu] uname26 for RHEL7 (score: 1)
Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 19:30:33 +0000
Has anyone used the uname26 mentioned as work around for 7.1 client install on Linux using 3.x kernel instead of 2.6.x kernel? Link discussing use of uname26 is at Symantec: http://www.symantec.com/b
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-09/msg00000.html (14,812 bytes)

116. Re: [Veritas-bu] uname26 for RHEL7 (score: 1)
Author: Dan Pritts <danno AT umich DOT edu>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 16:01:14 -0400
There appears to be an RPM here for Scientific Linux, which is a RHEL-alike: http://linuxsoft.cern.ch/cern/slc61/x86_64/yum/updates/repoview/uname26.html Lightner, Jeff September 2, 2014 at 3:30 PM
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-09/msg00001.html (17,330 bytes)

117. Re: [Veritas-bu] uname26 for RHEL7 (score: 1)
Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT dsservices DOT com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 20:15:40 +0000
Thanks. I had seen that and some others for RHEL6 source from rpmseek. Since I already had the source I was just trying to see if anyone had found it from official RHEL repositories. Its more a curio
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-09/msg00002.html (20,206 bytes)

118. [Veritas-bu] DR site preparation (score: 1)
Author: pranav batra <pranav_venture AT hotmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:26:52 +0530
Good Day Geeks ! We are in planning phase of creating a new DC and its DR site. The plan is to create a new master server with three media servers at the production site and a standy by master server
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-09/msg00003.html (12,413 bytes)

119. [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.1 to 7.5 differences. (score: 1)
Author: "Preston, Douglas" <dlpreston AT lereta DOT com>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:11:35 -0700
Does 7.5 write to tape differently than 7.1? Trying to import a tape written in 7.5 to our master server using 7.1 bpimport -id ATL323 Import phase 2 started 9/9/2014 8:24:46 AM INF - Importing polic
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-09/msg00004.html (21,012 bytes)

120. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.1 to 7.5 differences. (score: 1)
Author: "Preston, Douglas" <dlpreston AT lereta DOT com>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 13:19:42 -0700
I think I am going to have a lot of trouble importing this tape. Not only am I on 7.1 but my master server is Windows and theirs was Solaris Anyone have a possible way for me to read this tape withou
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2014-09/msg00005.html (15,902 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu