Author: ramo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 03:47:45 -0400
hi again ... plz help ! +-- +-- To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT li
hi again ... plz help ! When you post questions on this forum, please do yourself and others a favor. Include full details on your NetWorker configuration. Server OS, NetWorker version, type of back
Ramo your SN3000 is presenting the same WWN for both drives. The recommendation was to get rid of the SN3000 but if you don't get rid of the SN3000 then you have to fix the problem you are having wit
Author: ramo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 08:44:49 -0400
stan plz read my first poste...! +-- +-- To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-requ
Author: Peter Viertel <Peter.Viertel AT MACQUARIE DOT COM>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 13:22:45 +1000
a common cause of this problem is that your tape devices are setup in the wrong order. ________________________________ Netoworker 7.2 UNIX AIX 5.3 (ML4) L40 [2 devices + 2 mail slots + 20 authorized
Author: ramo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 03:03:34 -0400
thx Peter; but how to check that my tape devices are setup in the wrong order or not ? +-- +-- To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type "signoff networker" in
Author: Francis Swasey <Frank.Swasey AT UVM DOT EDU>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 05:56:44 -0400
The way I do that is to have NetWorker mount a tape in a drive and then go look on the system to see if it got mounted in the correct drive. I know which drive it should be, and use the mt command to
Author: ramo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 08:40:11 -0400
i have 2 drivers : lsdev -Cc tape ==> rmt0 Available 08-08-00-6,0 LVD SCSI 4mm Tape Drive rmt1 Available 0A-08-02 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive rmt2 Available 0A-08-02 Other FC SCSI Tape Drive so,i stoppe
Author: Frank Swasey <Frank.Swasey AT UVM DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 08:53:24 -0400
When we say the the problem is drive order, we mean that networker thinks the drives are in a different order than they really are. What you have confirmed with your test is that the drives physical
Author: ramo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 09:32:49 -0400
ok Francis;i'v do what u have telling me to do : 1-the Networker On 2-nsrjb - l -S 12 -f /dev/rmt1.1 <- loading the tape in drive rmt1 3-mt -f /dev/rmt1 status 4-nsrjb - l -S 12 -f /dev/rmt2.1 <- loa
Author: Fazil Saiyed <Fazil.Saiyed AT ANIXTER DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 08:23:19 -0500
Hello, You may want to look at previous post on persistence binding etc to get detail on how to correct tapes from re-sequencing. Generally, you should use persistence binding with your HBA ( Details
Author: ramo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 11:26:35 -0400
thx Fazil Saiyed,but i have not anderstand what u mean...plz explain more,i m new in the networker and Aix os. +-- +-- To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and typ
Author: Francis Swasey <Frank.Swasey AT UVM DOT EDU>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 11:43:42 -0400
Fazil, If you are recommending that I use persistent binding, then I will have to tell you that it is useless for me to do that because I have each tape directly connected to a port on an HBA. Since
Author: Fazil Saiyed <Fazil.Saiyed AT ANIXTER DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 10:50:17 -0500
Hello, I am not AIX person, but if i understood your problem correctly, your drives are getting out of sequence either due to reboot, being off-line, servicing etc, What i wanted to say is to "bind"
Author: Fazil Saiyed <Fazil.Saiyed AT ANIXTER DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 10:53:38 -0500
Hello, I agree, it will not apply to your environment, as noted below. Thanks for the clarification. Francis Swasey <Frank.Swasey AT uvm DOT edu> 05/27/2008 10:43 AM To Fazil.Saiyed AT anixter DOT co
Author: Davina Treiber <Davina.Treiber AT PEEVRO.CO DOT UK>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 17:32:49 +0100
If you are recommending that I use persistent binding, then I will have to tell you that it is useless for me to do that because I have each tape directly connected to a port on an HBA. Since persist
On 2008-05-27 18:32, Davina Treiber revealed: To my knowledge, this statement is incorrect. We don't use persistent binding or any other tweaks to run our networker installation, which is running on
Ps. Why did Sony even bother releasing SAIT-2? Three times the media cost as LTO-4 and not even half the throughput.. And considering the piss-poor track record of SAIT-1... :P Oscar; I am wondering
This is the mapping from the logical tape name to the Solaris device name. In most circumastances, it is stable. The mapping from the loop/fabric device to the "Solaris device" depends on your FC dri