Author: jeronimo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:32:03 -0700
I can only say Networker has become a lot more picky from 7.4 to 7.5 to 7.6 ... about the naming and related certificates etc. (nsr/res/nsrladb), so be careful. +-- +--
Author: jeronimo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:34:17 -0700
Oh yeah we did when going from 7.4 to 7.6 (and from LTO4 to LTO6). But we also upped the parallelisms somewhat. But as bingo said, it seems to simply queue the requests. +-- +--
Author: Davina Treiber <Davina.Treiber AT PEEVRO.CO DOT UK>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:38:52 +0100
"Legato" did not write anything. Legato is the name of a software company that ceased to exist ten years ago. They had multiple products, one of which was called NetWorker. NetWorker is not called Le
Author: Davina Treiber <Davina.Treiber AT PEEVRO.CO DOT UK>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:53:52 +0100
Speeding up recoveries requires innovative thinking. In the virtual world you could have a system where a disk based backup target (say for example a Data Domain) could host the recovered image on th
Author: "Stanley R. Horwitz" <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:40:37 +0000
All of a sudden this weekend, I am seeing NetWorker throw up an error with labeling LTO-5 tapes that are marked as recyclable. The error says something along the lines of ... Cannot recycle volume: C
Author: bingo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 07:04:33 -0700
Hi Davina, what made you so angry about the name 'Legato'? - I think this is perfect example to explain the conflict about the company and the product name. Of course we are talking about 'NetWorker'
Author: Bill Wilkie <billwilkie AT HOTMAIL DOT COM>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:33:56 +0000
Perhaps there was not enough room on tapes 20 and 21 for the 640GB backup so it skipped them. But there was enough room to write 127, so it went back to it for the smaller backup. OR, it ay have sent
Try this. It works fine with ksh, sh and bash COMMAND -- nsradmin -i - <<EOF | nsrfilter.sh . type: NSR client show name; client id EOF FILTER ("nsrfilter.sh:") -- tr -s "\n" "@" |\ sed 's/\\@//g' |\
Author: "Goslin, Paul" <PGoslin AT CINCOM DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:33:19 +0000
Hi - We are running NW 7.6 on Win2008 64bit. Just added a new Windows client from a new domain we are in the process of rolling out. Networker refuses to back it up. Keeps failing with: -- From: lega
Author: "Goslin, Paul" <PGoslin AT CINCOM DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:34:03 +0000
Got it working by adding an entry in the hosts file of the NW server... It was not in our local DNS, should have tried adding it to hosts before posting the question/problem... Hi - We are running NW
Author: Michael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:48:52 -0400
I would have made sure it was in DNS before adding an entry to a hosts file. It's a lot easier to make one entry in DNS when an IP changes for whatever reason, rather than entries in however many ho
Author: gunnerjoe <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 08:58:46 -0700
Hi All, The tapes (LTO5) that "NETWORKER" skipped were empty. Sorry I upset you davina with the word Legato, but you may want to write EMC and tell them to remove the 100's of "Legato" references fro
In regard to: [Networker] Problem with new domain client..., Goslin, Paul...: We are running NW 7.6 on Win2008 64bit. Just added a new Windows client from a new domain we are in the process of rollin
In regard to: Re: [Networker] Problem with new domain client..., Goslin,...: Got it working by adding an entry in the hosts file of the NW server... It was not in our local DNS, should have tried add
Author: Michael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:20:18 -0400
(or We don't have one. might Doesn't appear to be. It seems to be for pushing out entire client version upgrades, not configuration changes. I seem to have run into a permissions issue. I decided to
In regard to: Re: [Networker] Renaming a server; question about clients,...: I can't imagine I would need to edit the \nsr\res\servers file on all my clients by hand (or by writing some script to do
Author: Michael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:30:30 -0400
That I'm not (yet) trying to update the servers file, I am trying to copy the current one to a new name, as a backup. You don't need to stop the service to do that (at least, when I do it locally, y
Author: Mathew Harvest <Mathew.HARVEST AT COMMUNITIES.QLD.GOV DOT AU>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:18:20 +0000
Hey Michael, I got one of our windows sysadmins to script the change for us ... I'm pretty sure the Networker installer restricts the permissions on the file so that only the Local System, and possib
Author: Michael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:19:00 -0400
My account is a member of the Domain Admin group, which should have enough permissions. But I can't even see the "res" directly remotely. If I can see a working example, and the procedure of how he/
Author: Michael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:47:38 -0400
enough Looking at the permissions of the RES folder, I see that NETWORK is on DENY, FULL CONTROL. If I understand it correctly, that means that RES is not accessible over a network connection at all