Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Saveset\s+Recovery\s+using\s+RMAN\s*$/: 44043 ]

Total 44043 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [Networker] Legato skipping tapes (score: 1)
Author: Tim Mooney <Tim.Mooney AT NDSU DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:48:39 -0500
In regard to: [Networker] Legato skipping tapes, gunnerjoe said (at 9:52am...: Legato wrote tape 0019 until full, skipped tape 0020 and 0021, then wrote 640GB to tape 22 which is still appendable, th
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00039.html (12,869 bytes)

322. Re: [Networker] Notifications Setup (score: 1)
Author: Tim Mooney <Tim.Mooney AT NDSU DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:00:26 -0500
In regard to: [Networker] Notifications Setup, jeronimo said (at 7:22am on...: This confusues not only you. To resolve that, there must at least one other criteria exist which is not visible at all.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00040.html (13,197 bytes)

323. [Networker] Legato skipping tapes (score: 1)
Author: gunnerjoe <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:32:33 -0700
Hi All, Thanks for the replies. All tapes in the default pool. This is NOT a clone pool and no SANS. Nothing in the logs. Tape library has only one tape drive. To Dave's point, I did put in a new tra
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00041.html (11,988 bytes)

324. [Networker] Upgrading to NW 8 - storage nodes question (score: 1)
Author: Michael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 14:35:43 -0400
Used to be, if you upgraded your NW server, you had to do all your storage nodes to that same version at the same time. Has that changed with NW 8? Specifically, I am running NW 7.6.2. I want to go t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00042.html (12,103 bytes)

325. Re: [Networker] Upgrading to NW 8 - storage nodes question (score: 1)
Author: "Stanley R. Horwitz" <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:48:33 +0000
Used to be, if you upgraded your NW server, you had to do all your storage nodes to that same version at the same time. Has that changed with NW 8? Specifically, I am running NW 7.6.2. I want to go t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00043.html (12,268 bytes)

326. Re: [Networker] Upgrading to NW 8 - storage nodes question (score: 1)
Author: Tony Garza <TGarza AT FROSTBANK DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:52:50 -0500
You for sure need to upgrade your Storage Nodes when going to version 8, it is actually documented in EMC documentation. Thanks, Tony Garza Frost Bank Network Engineering Senior Network Engineer 210-
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00044.html (12,859 bytes)

327. Re: [Networker] Upgrading to NW 8 - storage nodes question (score: 1)
Author: Tim Mooney <Tim.Mooney AT NDSU DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:59:20 -0500
In regard to: [Networker] Upgrading to NW 8 - storage nodes question,...: Used to be, if you upgraded your NW server, you had to do all your storage nodes to that same version at the same time. Has t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00045.html (13,329 bytes)

328. [Networker] (score: 1)
Author: Tony Garza <TGarza AT FROSTBANK DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 14:03:54 -0500
How many of you guys are using Networker 8 and DD boost is it really that great? We are looking at a disk target and currently use Networker 8. I am not impressed with the DD990 hardware and the sing
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00046.html (12,939 bytes)

329. [Networker] (score: 1)
Author: Tim Mooney <Tim.Mooney AT NDSU DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 14:26:36 -0500
In regard to: [Networker], Tony Garza said (at 2:03pm on Jun 14, 2013): How many of you guys are using Networker 8 and DD boost is it really that great? I've asked similar questions in the past six m
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00047.html (14,161 bytes)

330. Re: [Networker] Upgrading to NW 8 - storage nodes question (score: 1)
Author: Michael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:47:35 -0400
your I've spent all this week migrating my NW server to new hardware (that was Tue), and the last 3 days replacing/upgrading hardware and VMware patches. Haven't had time to look at the NW notes yet
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00048.html (12,923 bytes)

331. [Networker] Renaming a server; question about clients (score: 1)
Author: Michael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:53:20 -0400
So I need to rename my NW server next week (as if I didn't have enough to occupy my time ... LOL). I have the procedure for renaming the server somewhere (or maybe it's in the Procedure Guide; I will
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00049.html (12,624 bytes)

332. [Networker] Tapes Marked Full Prematurely when Cloning (score: 1)
Author: Eric Horn <ehorn AT CO.LUCAS.OH DOT US>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:51:39 -0400
I'm on version 8.0.1.4 of NW and the server os is CentOS 5.2 (32). We have an HP MSL4048 Jukebox with 2 drives. Up until earlier this year the backups fit two tapes and then they were cloned and life
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00050.html (11,914 bytes)

333. Re: [Networker] Upgrading to NW 8 - storage nodes question (score: 1)
Author: "Browning, David" <DBrown AT LSUHSC DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 20:01:11 +0000
We have 3 NW servers, with one NW server being a live "test" box. It has only 9 clients, so that is the backup server we upgrade first, to test new software. That server is also our NMC server. A cou
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00051.html (14,681 bytes)

334. Re: [Networker] Tapes Marked Full Prematurely when Cloning (score: 1)
Author: "Werth, Dave" <dave.werth AT GARMIN DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 20:11:00 +0000
In your support session with HP did you check to see if the tape drives themselves were the source of the problem? In my experience tapes being prematurely marked full are usually because the drive i
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00052.html (13,154 bytes)

335. Re: [Networker] Tapes Marked Full Prematurely when Cloning (score: 1)
Author: Michael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:14:52 -0400
I have a NW server with an HP LTO-3 autochanger. If I leave the HP Insight services running, the tapes get marked full after only a few gig. This is not just the removable services service; this is
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00053.html (11,857 bytes)

336. Re: [Networker] Tapes Marked Full Prematurely when Cloning (score: 1)
Author: Tim Mooney <Tim.Mooney AT NDSU DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:26:12 -0500
In regard to: [Networker] Tapes Marked Full Prematurely when Cloning, Eric...: We have an HP MSL4048 Jukebox with 2 drives. Up until earlier this year the backups fit two tapes and then they were clo
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00054.html (13,494 bytes)

337. Re: [Networker] Renaming a server; question about clients (score: 1)
Author: Tim Mooney <Tim.Mooney AT NDSU DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:34:26 -0500
In regard to: [Networker] Renaming a server; question about clients,...: I can't imagine I would need to edit the \nsr\res\servers file on all my clients by hand (or by writing some script to do it);
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00055.html (13,431 bytes)

338. Re: [Networker] Tapes Marked Full Prematurely when Cloning (score: 1)
Author: Tim Mooney <Tim.Mooney AT NDSU DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:35:39 -0500
In regard to: Re: [Networker] Tapes Marked Full Prematurely when Cloning,...: Going back through the logs, it does appear to only be /dev/nst1 each time. We're having an exceedingly strange issue wit
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00056.html (15,849 bytes)

339. Re: [Networker] Tapes Marked Full Prematurely when Cloning (score: 1)
Author: Dag Nygren <dag AT newtech DOT fi>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 11:41:01 +0300
Networker will mark the tapes as full when encountering a write error. the source of that can be alot of things. But the first thing to do is to scan the daemon.raw file for the I/O error before the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00057.html (12,637 bytes)

340. [Networker] Notifications Setup (score: 1)
Author: jeronimo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:27:50 -0700
So are there other criterias not visible in the GUI? I have tried using nsradmin, I found for example: type: NSR notification; name: Tape mount request 3; comment: ; action: \ "/usr/bin/mailx -s \"b
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-06/msg00058.html (12,782 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu