Author: "Browning, David" <DBrown AT LSUHSC DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 19:12:27 +0000
Thank you. I'm curious about the Mailbox/folder restores require that that the backup/restore use AFT Devices. So only database/storage groups backups/restores would work using tape? David M. Brownin
Author: "Goslin, Paul" <PGoslin AT CINCOM DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:15:47 +0000
Ahh - my mistake - we're probably not running SP3 on our exchange server as I don't admin it , will have to check into what level we're at and warn the mail admin about this .... Thanks for the updat
Author: "Werth, Dave" <dave.werth AT GARMIN DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 21:32:48 +0000
We are on NetWorker 8.0.1.1. All of a sudden lately it has quite automatically changing tapes in the drive when one gets full. I had to drop and re-add the library a few weeks ago so I suppose that h
Author: bingo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 03:52:40 -0700
Does batch labeling work? If so, the general management is ok, just that no data will be written. In this case i suppose that the tapes will not be marked as full. That could also be the reason why N
Author: Vygur <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:11:52 -0700
Afternoon everyone, I'm not very strong on my awk commands and was wondering if someone could help me figure this out in creating a script that can help me do this? I'm running the following command:
In regard to: [Networker] Send mminfo results into split column csv file,...: I'm not very strong on my awk commands and was wondering if someone could help me figure this out in creating a script th
Author: Vygur <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:18:28 -0700
Ahhh! Thank you! I completely forgot about the -xc switch. It's working now. I have it as this now and it works perfectly for what i need it for: mminfo -avot -t "two years ago" -q type="LTO Ultrium-
All Server: Linux (RHEL 6.4) x86_64, NetWorker 7.6.2.5 Client: Windows 2008R2, NetWorker 8.0.1.5 or 8.0.2 We've been upgrading some of our backup clients to the 8.0.x series, in preparation for upgra
Author: bingo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 23:15:27 -0700
I am a bit scared about the goal of the whole mminfo command. The query part seems too complicated to me and combination of the reporting parameter does not really make sense to me. What are you real
Author: bingo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 23:21:41 -0700
Tim, these volume name refers to the usually hidden volume where Windows keeps the OS specific file (copies). You may also assign a drive letter to them. BTW - not using 'All' is fine in general. How
Author: Michael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:06:25 -0400
then "All". It is, for the NW 8.x clients, apparently. I see the same thing, but only with NW 8.x clients .. It seems to be a NW 8.x change, and one that only affects Win 2008 R2, as I don't see it
Author: bingo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 06:32:00 -0700
"It seems to be a NW 8.x change, and one that only affects Win 2008 R2, as I don't see it on the Win2003 clients that have NW 8.x clients, I belive." The reason for that is pretty simple - such parti
In regard to: [Networker] strange Windows volume name when using All...: these volume name refers to the usually hidden volume where Windows keeps the OS specific file (copies). You may also assign a
Author: George Sinclair - NOAA Federal <george.sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:43:04 -0400
Hi, I'm not sure how to phrase this question, but my experience with NW has always been host based. In other words, if you want to recover a file from some host from long ago, and that host no longer
Author: bingo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:48:21 -0700
In general, this is not possible. You are right that the 'context-independent recovery of files' could be implemented but i think EMC will refuse to do so. The result would be files with no access re
In regard to: [Networker] Question regarding NetWorker's recovery strategy,...: I'm not sure how to phrase this question, but my experience with NW has always been host based. In other words, if you
Author: "Harston, Evan" <Evan.Harston AT MCKESSON DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:19:22 +0000
The only way around not having a specific client name is to place the desired directories onto a specific device which has its own hostname (and IP address and DNS entry), a virtual host name if you
Author: "Clark, Patricia A." <clarkpa AT ORNL DOT GOV>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 16:34:32 -0400
I find this to be typical for storage devices where you don't want to do an NDMP type backup and don't really want a client per se as the owner. While not ideal, my networker server used NFS mounts a
Author: "Werth, Dave" <dave.werth AT GARMIN DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:17:55 +0000
Batch labeling works just fine. NW does send the alert "Waiting for a writable tape for pool xxx" and there are perfectly good empty tapes sitting there waiting to be used. Dave Werth Garmin AT, Inc.
Author: Mathew Harvest <Mathew.HARVEST AT COMMUNITIES.QLD.GOV DOT AU>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:20:40 +0000
Hey Tim, One thing you could do is change the save set definition to ALL-NTFS - assuming that all your file systems are NTFS .... pretty sure it works for most file system types, I've used ALL-NTFS,