Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Saveset\s+Recovery\s+using\s+RMAN\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Networker\]\s+Saveset\s+Recovery\s+using\s+RMAN\s*$/: 44043 ]

Total 44043 documents matching your query.

21. [Networker] Automating save set list? (score: 1): Author: George Sinclair - NOAA Federal <george.sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:19:57 -0400; Let's say you'll have a number of file systems like /disk/user1, /disk/user2, etc. You never know when a new one might get created. Is there a way to have these automatically get added to the backups; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00020.html (13,337 bytes)
22. [Networker] Unable to start nsrexecd when upgrading windows 2003 server from 7.6 to 8.0 (score: 1): Author: "Roberts, Justin (GE, Appl & Light)" <Justin.Roberts2 AT GE DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:53:44 +0000; We are currently upgrading our environment from 7.6 to 8.0. On several occasions when installing 8.0 client on 32-bit Windows 2003 servers the install gets to the end and is unable to start the servi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00021.html (11,135 bytes)
23. [Networker] Unable to start nsrexecd when upgrading windows 2003 server (score: 1): Author: bingo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 02:18:16 -0700; If you have verified that the service runs as "Local System" account, i am pretty sure that deleting/renaming the ..\nsr\res\nsrladb directory will resolve the issue. I have had a bunch of problems w; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00022.html (11,797 bytes)
24. [Networker] Automating save set list? (score: 1): Author: bingo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 02:22:03 -0700; I do not know any other easy fix but a true separation of executables and application data to be stored on different volumes. In general this is best practice anyway. +-- +--; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00023.html (11,888 bytes)
25. [Networker] Q about automatically labeling tape based on barcode (score: 1): Author: Michael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>; Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:25:44 -0400; We've finally gotten around to changing our offsite tape storage vendor, and the barcodes that the new vendor uses will be readable by the barcode reader in my library (previously, we had to use a cu; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00024.html (13,258 bytes)
26. Re: [Networker] Automating save set list? (score: 1): Author: George Sinclair - NOAA Federal <george.sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>; Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:14:10 -0400; On 2013-09-12 05:22, bingo wrote: I do not know any other easy fix but a true separation of executables and application data to be stored on different volumes. In general this is best practice anyway; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00025.html (12,899 bytes)
27. Re: [Networker] Unable to start nsrexecd when upgrading windows 2003 server (score: 1): Author: FAIDHERBE Thierry <thierry.faidherbe AT FOREM DOT BE>; Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 06:21:38 +0000; You can also try to start nsrexecd in debug, to see where it fails Log as local admin and launch nsrexecd -D 9 from %install_dir%\bin HTH TH Kind regards - Bien cordialement - Vriendelijke groeten, T; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00026.html (13,170 bytes)
28. [Networker] SV: [Networker] Q about automatically labeling tape based on barcode (score: 1): Author: Tony Albers <Tony.Albers AT PROACT DOT DK>; Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 07:03:57 +0000; Hi Michael, AFAIK you can't choose to only label "some" tapes in the library when using auto-labeling. If some of the barcodes are unreadable, you will run into errors. What you could do, is partitio; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00027.html (14,330 bytes)
29. Re: [Networker] SV: [Networker] Q about automatically labeling tape based on barcode (score: 1): Author: Dag Nygren <dag AT newtech DOT fi>; Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:08:18 +0300; I wouldn't expect problems with the old tapes even if you turn on "Match barcodes". Not as long as you don't try to relabel/recycle them. This as the setting is applied during the labeling process. B; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00028.html (13,167 bytes)
30. [Networker] Automating save set list? (score: 1): Author: bingo <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 03:44:09 -0700; I think it is pretty simple: If you exclusively store the data you want to protect on specific volumes you just need to define them in the save set list. It avoids complicated directives and new dire; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00029.html (12,000 bytes)
31. Re: [Networker] Q about automatically labeling tape based on barcode (score: 1): Author: Frank Swasey <Frank.Swasey AT UVM DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 08:06:57 -0400; I wouldn't expect problems with the old tapes even if you turn on "Match barcodes". Not as long as you don't try to relabel/recycle them. This as the setting is applied during the labeling process.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00030.html (13,553 bytes)
32. Re: [Networker] SV: [Networker] Q about automatically labeling tape based on barcode (score: 1): Author: Michael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>; Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 08:28:19 -0400; Yeah, I didn't think so. Ratz. I have 4500+ tapes I would need to do that to, and a legal restriction forbidding overwriting removable media, which means I would need to purchase 4500 new tapes, jus; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00031.html (13,212 bytes)
33. Re: [Networker] SV: [Networker] Q about automatically labeling tape based on barcode (score: 1): Author: Michael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>; Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 08:30:57 -0400; I'm not so worried about the relabel/recycle aspect (at this time). I'm more worried about tapes not inventorying, or mounting correctly for recovers. And I'm still running jobs at the moment, so I; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00032.html (13,808 bytes)
34. Re: [Networker] SV: [Networker] Q about automatically labeling tape based on barcode (score: 1): Author: FAIDHERBE Thierry <thierry.faidherbe AT FOREM DOT BE>; Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:14:43 +0000; ? Networker uses volume name, not barcode values ! So it should not be a problem. So, what are your worries/problems about ? Th --Message d'origine-- De : EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00033.html (14,597 bytes)
35. Re: [Networker] SV: [Networker] Q about automatically labeling tape based on barcode (score: 1): Author: Michael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>; Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:33:01 -0400; I was worried that if I inventoried a slot, and the actual tape label did not match the barcode label, then the tape wouldn't mount. But that should only be a problem on relabeling tapes (which at t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00034.html (13,289 bytes)
36. Re: [Networker] SV: [Networker] Q about automatically labeling tape based on barcode (score: 1): Author: FAIDHERBE Thierry <thierry.faidherbe AT FOREM DOT BE>; Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:11:44 +0000; It would not be a problem even if volume does not match barcode. Have a try : load barcode ABC001 on a volume, label it. In media db, volume label=ABC001, BARCODE=ABC001. Now, change barcode ABC001 t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00035.html (14,463 bytes)
37. [Networker] Change in name and scope of this list (score: 1): Author: "Stanley R. Horwitz" <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:23:02 +0000; Hello NetWorker list subscribers, For those of you who dont know, I run this list and I have been doing so for roughly the past 20 years. I am writing now because of two changes I feel need to be mad; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00036.html (13,965 bytes)
38. Re: [Networker] Change in name and scope of this list (score: 1): Author: "Clark, Patricia A." <clarkpa AT ORNL DOT GOV>; Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:34:07 -0400; I guess change is inevitable. However it settles, this will still be the best list on Networker questions. The suggested name seems a bit cryptic. I know it's long, perhaps EMC-DataProtection-L? I al; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00037.html (15,001 bytes)
39. [Networker] Suspend mailing list for a week? (score: 1): Author: Michael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>; Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:17:44 -0400; I'm going to be out on leave all next week, and have already set my mail OoO notification. But I can't find the list URL to suspend myself for a week, so bounces don't happen. Anyone point me to that; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00038.html (11,975 bytes)
40. Re: [Networker] Suspend mailing list for a week? (score: 1): Author: "Stanley R. Horwitz" <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:32:40 +0000; It is http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html On Sep 13, 2013, at 15:20, "Michael Leone" <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV> wrote:; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Networker/2013-09/msg00039.html (12,422 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]