Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+backuppc\s+4\:\s+rsync\s+error\:\s+unexplained\s+error\s+$code\s+255$\s+at\s+io\.c$629$\s+\[Receiver\=3\.0\.9\.8\]\)\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+backuppc\s+4\:\s+rsync\s+error\:\s+unexplained\s+error\s+$code\s+255$\s+at\s+io\.c$629$\s+\[Receiver\=3\.0\.9\.8\]\)\s*$/: 19998 ]

Total 19998 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [BackupPC-users] destination directory and encrytion (score: 1): Author: Tim Fletcher <tim AT night-shade.org DOT uk>; Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 23:47:53 +0100; I've read over the thread and BackupPC is in this case not the right answer. The issues that you are trying to solve, ie separation of clients via different encryption keys and not trusting the serve; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00012.html (14,728 bytes)
22. Re: [BackupPC-users] destination directory and encryption (score: 1): Author: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists AT websitemanagers.com DOT au>; Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 14:20:05 +1000; On 03/09/15 06:06, Frantiek Starı wrote: What about this? http://rsyncrypto.lingnu.com/index.php/Home_Page I've been thinking about trying it, but never did.. AFAIK it should look as an normal rsync; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00013.html (18,424 bytes)
23. Re: [BackupPC-users] destination directory and encrytion (score: 1): Author: Jan Novak <repcom AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:50:59 +0200; Am 02.09.2015 um 21:30 schrieb Dr. Boris Neubert: EXACTLY !!! I have play around with iscsi to mount the remot file system locally and ebcrypt it, but it is complicated and slow. And if the tunnel br; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00014.html (14,444 bytes)
24. Re: [BackupPC-users] Fwd: Re: BackupPC 4.0 --acls question (score: 1): Author: Bob of Donelson Trophy <bob AT donelsontrophy DOT net>; Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 06:57:52 -0500; I have discovered that if I select ONLY the "--xattr" the log file says the following: XferLOG file /bpc4data/pc/192.168.1x6.53/XferLOG.8.z created 2015-09-09 07:37:56 Backup prep: type = incr, case; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00015.html (23,536 bytes)
25. [BackupPC-users] Excludes only at a specific directory depth? (with tar as XferMethod and BackupPC 3.3.0) (score: 1): Author: Axel Beckert <beckert AT phys.ethz DOT ch>; Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 17:57:58 +0200; Hi, besides other machines (Windows, Linux), we're backing up MacOS X workstations/laptops with BackupPC running on Debian GNU/Linux 8 Jessie (current Debian stable release, i.e. running BackupPC 3.3; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00016.html (15,606 bytes)
26. Re: [BackupPC-users] Excludes only at a specific directory depth? (with tar as XferMethod and BackupPC 3.3.0) (score: 1): Author: Wolfgang Karall <lists+backuppc-users AT karall-edv DOT at>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:09:30 +0200; Hi Axel, BackupFilesExclude only understands one special key, '*', for all shares not matched by any other key in the configuration. Maybe you can adapt the $Conf{TarClientCmd} to have the exclude li; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00017.html (13,765 bytes)
27. Re: [BackupPC-users] Excludes only at a specific directory depth? (with tar as XferMethod and BackupPC 3.3.0) (score: 1): Author: Axel Beckert <beckert AT phys.ethz DOT ch>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:52:41 +0200; Hi Wolfgang, Yep, that's how I read the comments in config.pl as well as the code of BackupPC::Xfer::Tar. That's an interesting idea. While reading the manual I noticed that there are tons of ways to; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00018.html (14,615 bytes)
28. [BackupPC-users] All incr fail(SIGPIPE) all full complete - cygwin/W7 (score: 1): Author: fred AT damen DOT org; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 19:42:31 -0500; Greetings, I am having a problem in which incremental backups fail with(XFerlog): Child is aborting Got exit from child Done: 1 files, 544 bytes Got fatal error during xfer (aborted by signal=PIPE) B; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00019.html (13,212 bytes)
29. Re: [BackupPC-users] All incr fail(SIGPIPE) all full complete - cygwin/W7 (score: 1): Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 20:33:38 -0500; That scenario is pretty common when there is a nat gateway involved, but a stateful host firewall could also time out the connection and start blocking after some amount of idle time. -- Les Mikesell; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00020.html (13,757 bytes)
30. [BackupPC-users] Restore a BackupPC server (score: 1): Author: Patrick Begou <Patrick.Begou AT legi.grenoble-inp DOT fr>; Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:00:31 +0200; Hi, It's my first post on this list even if I use backupPC for a while without any problem. But problems finaly came... My backupPC server's system disk in down and I must change it. I've a backup of; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00021.html (12,131 bytes)
31. Re: [BackupPC-users] Restore a BackupPC server (score: 1): Author: David Cramblett <david AT functionalchaos DOT net>; Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:35:49 -0700; It should be fine. All of the backups and the backup lists should be on the /var/lib/BackupPC disk. Sent from my mobile device David Cramblett On Sep 11, 2015 1:19 AM, "Patrick Begou" <Patrick.Bego; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00022.html (14,269 bytes)
32. Re: [BackupPC-users] All incr fail(SIGPIPE) all full complete - cygwin/W7 (score: 1): Author: fred AT damen DOT org; Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:55:52 -0500; The networking device connecting the two computers is a highly configurable Cisco router and I am told that it was configured to act as a simple switch between the computers on the LAN. I would not b; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00023.html (15,844 bytes)
33. Re: [BackupPC-users] All incr fail(SIGPIPE) all full complete - cygwin/W7 (score: 1): Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:49:17 -0500; If the IP addresses of the source and target both fit within the netmask, the router should not be involved in the connection. The addresses you mention aren't within a typical class C range (/24), s; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00024.html (15,001 bytes)
34. [BackupPC-users] Any news on retransmitting data already in the pool (score: 1): Author: martin f krafft <madduck AT madduck DOT net>; Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 14:17:28 +0200; Hey folks, having been hit yet again and unexpectedly by the fact that BackupPC transfers all files' data just to figure out whether the file is already in the pool, I found an old mail of mine to th; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00025.html (12,568 bytes)
35. [BackupPC-users] Digest::MD5 vs md5sum (score: 1): Author: gregrwm <backuppc-users AT whitleymott DOT net>; Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:08:20 -0500; the following commands demonstrate that either Digest::MD5 and gnu md5sum are not compatible, or that i haven't got the backuppc md5 formula quite right. can anyone set me straight? the commands be; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00026.html (15,259 bytes)
36. Re: [BackupPC-users] Digest::MD5 vs md5sum (score: 1): Author: Holger Parplies <wbppc AT parplies DOT de>; Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 22:08:03 +0200; Hi, gregrwm wrote on 2015-09-15 14:08:20 -0500 [[BackupPC-users] Digest::MD5 vs md5sum]: probably not, considering your obfuscated bash code. Where did you get the idea to 4b $s? You might try echo -; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00027.html (11,771 bytes)
37. Re: [BackupPC-users] Any news on retransmitting data already in the pool (score: 1): Author: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists AT websitemanagers.com DOT au>; Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 01:57:39 +1000; You can also use Backuppc 4 alpha, which has that feature (the main reason I'm using it, since it is "standard practice" for a number of servers to copy photos to the server, then import (copy) the p; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00028.html (13,219 bytes)
38. [BackupPC-users] Can`t Change {TopDir} Location . . (score: 1): Author: tdevoye <backuppc-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 05:16:34 -0700; Hello guys, [root@]# /etc/init.d/backuppc restart Shutting down BackupPC: [ OK ] Starting BackupPC: [ OK ] BackupPC: WARNING: Your BackupPC $Conf{TopDir} is not listed in the locate BackupPC: databas; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00029.html (12,887 bytes)
39. Re: [BackupPC-users] Digest::MD5 vs md5sum (score: 1): Author: gregrwm <backuppc-users AT whitleymott DOT net>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:03:52 -0500; Where did you get the idea to 4b $s? You might try echo -n ning it instead... Hope that helps. Not sure what you are actually trying to do, though. in order to copy my backups through a narrow pipe; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00030.html (17,414 bytes)
40. [BackupPC-users] Backuppc 1 full and rest incremental (score: 1): Author: bubolski <backuppc-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 01:23:13 -0700; Hello i have two question. 1. Is it posiible to set backuppc to backup at frist time full and rest do incremental because right now it doing 1 full 4 inc each 4 days if i remember well. 2. What is th; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2015-09/msg00031.html (11,712 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]