Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BackupPC\-users\]\s+Status\s+on\s+new\s+BackupPC\s+v4\s*$/: 82 ]

Total 82 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists AT websitemanagers.com DOT au>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 00:31:23 +1000
Hi, I've trawled through my inbox, and submitted a few issues that I was able to find. Right now, I would suggest the highest priority issues are 1 and 4. If you are knowledgeable with C, then please
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00080.html (16,214 bytes)

62. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom <chrome AT real-time DOT com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 10:43:02 -0400
I have to agree. After 10+ years of using BPC I've not found many situations where it would be really useful. Better to get other functionality out sooner. As Voltaire said and Kalashnikov exemplifie
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00081.html (14,384 bytes)

63. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: Kris Lou <klou AT themusiclink DOT net>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 09:32:00 -0700
I have to agree. After 10+ years of using BPC I've not found many situations where it would be really useful. Better to get other functionality out sooner. As Voltaire said and Kalashnikov exemplifi
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00087.html (17,566 bytes)

64. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: Norm Legare <norm.legare AT axiomcrs DOT com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 12:46:53 -0400
Can I assume that github is very similar to Clearcase? From: klou Kris Lou Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 12:32 PM To: backuppc-users General list for user discussion, questions and support Subject: Re:
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00093.html (20,416 bytes)

65. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: Mauro Condarelli <mc5686 AT mclink DOT it>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 19:41:58 +0200
Hi Norm, comments inline. Il 16/05/2016 18:46, Norm Legare ha scritto: Not really. Github is built around git, which is philosophically different from Clearcase, even if there are some similarities.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00095.html (14,678 bytes)

66. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: Lars Tobias Skjong-Børsting <lists AT relatime DOT no>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 19:58:50 +0200
Git is not equal to Github, as Github is a web site that is hosting projects using Git, while Git is the actual version control system. I guess one of the biggest differences with clearcase is that g
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00097.html (15,543 bytes)

67. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: Norm Legare <norm.legare AT axiomcrs DOT com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 13:58:26 -0400
I ask this because if it was so, my Clearcase knowledge would be of some use to this effort. Of course, Clearcase may be a thing of the past and my knowledge is from 15 years ago. Hi Norm, comments i
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00098.html (16,491 bytes)

68. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: Norm Legare <norm.legare AT axiomcrs DOT com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 14:39:20 -0400
It sounds like a pull request is the same as checking out a file, but sort of in reverse. The request is granted by an admin and that alerts others that this file is being worked on and for whatever
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00100.html (17,191 bytes)

69. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom <chrome AT real-time DOT com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 17:08:33 -0400
That's a really good link. Thank you. -- Carl Soderstrom Systems Administrator Real-Time Enterprises www.real-time.com -- Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who bring
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00102.html (14,419 bytes)

70. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: Lars Tobias Skjong-Børsting <lists AT relatime DOT no>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 23:15:39 +0200
We have no CI set up yet. Maybe Travis could work. I'm not sure we even have a test suite. We should work on that, definitely. -- Best regards, Lars Tobias -- Mobile security can be enabling, not mer
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00104.html (15,086 bytes)

71. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: Richard Alloway <ralloway AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 11:01:22 -0400
I have the following available: 1) Perl programming 2) C programming 4) Git/CVS/Development skills If I can get approval to do any of this on work's dime (which I think I can do, since contributing t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00136.html (19,897 bytes)

72. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 10:46:40 -0500
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Richard Alloway <ralloway AT gmail DOT com> wrote: I think a test suite of some sort that can exercise most of the xfer methods with a round trip through the compres
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00137.html (15,365 bytes)

73. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: Mauro Condarelli <mc5686 AT mclink DOT it>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 17:47:20 +0200
Thanks for the offer Richard, we are getting organized, but it seems positive we are moving to github (see: https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc). comments below. Il 18/05/2016 17:01, Richard Alloway
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00138.html (15,121 bytes)

74. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: Richard Alloway <ralloway AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 12:16:07 -0400
I think a test suite of some sort that can exercise most of the xfer methods with a round trip through the compression code will be important if there is a larger team of people making changes.   I'
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00140.html (18,828 bytes)

75. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: Richard Alloway <ralloway AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 12:26:02 -0400
I haven't encountered this particular IP requirement before.  I am located in the US and will inquire about the explicit transfer of copyright with my management.  I'd be happy to give patch reviewin
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00141.html (18,337 bytes)

76. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 11:50:41 -0500
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Richard Alloway <ralloway AT gmail DOT com> wrote: You might want to look at jenkins to manage the automation. It is java and might be overkill, but it is pretty gre
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00146.html (15,611 bytes)

77. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: David Cramblett <david AT functionalchaos DOT net>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 09:58:41 -0700
You might want to look at jenkins to manage the automation.  It is java and might be overkill, but it is pretty great at cross-platform operations.  It can be triggered by changes in your source con
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00148.html (18,307 bytes)

78. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 12:13:17 -0500
I haven't used travis so I can't compare them, but I don't see anything about it running on windows. Jenkins can run in client/server mode where an agent runs on an assortment of different client mac
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00150.html (15,798 bytes)

79. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: Lars Tobias Skjong-Børsting <lists AT relatime DOT no>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 19:19:15 +0200
Hi, wrote: I would actually recommend doing this with Travis CI. https://travis-ci.org/ It's 100% free for open source projects, and it has fantastic integration with Github. It's used by Facebook, M
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00152.html (15,937 bytes)

80. Re: [BackupPC-users] Status on new BackupPC v4 (score: 1)
Author: David Cramblett <david AT functionalchaos DOT net>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 10:59:20 -0700
I haven't used travis so I can't compare them, but I don't see anything about it running on windows.  Jenkins can run in client/server mode where an agent runs on an assortment of different client m
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/BackupPC-users/2016-05/msg00155.html (19,284 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu