Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+tsm\s+and\s+data\s+domain\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+tsm\s+and\s+data\s+domain\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [ADSM-L] tsm and data domain (score: 1): Author: Steven Langdale <steven.langdale AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:20:44 +0000; We debated having a copy pool when doing our DD setup. We finally decided that using a daily DD snapshot was an acceptable solution. We take a Rick The problem with that is that you'd just be replica; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-06/msg00200.html (12,950 bytes)
22. Re: [ADSM-L] tsm and data domain (score: 1): Author: Richard Rhodes <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:52:47 -0400; I guess I don't see the difference. If logical corruption (rm -r * in the filepool or tsm screws up and deletes vols), the copy pool could be just as corrupt as the main pool. if the copy pool is in; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-06/msg00204.html (13,910 bytes)
23. Re: [ADSM-L] tsm and data domain (score: 1): Author: Steven Langdale <steven.langdale AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:05:45 +0000; I guess I don't see the difference. If logical corruption (rm -r * in the filepool or tsm screws up and deletes vols), the copy pool could be just as corrupt as the main pool. if the copy pool is in; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-06/msg00209.html (13,034 bytes)
24. [ADSM-L] TSM and Data Domain (score: 1): Author: "Bradberry, Kenneth" <Kenneth.Bradberry AT ACS-HCS DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:49:07 -0400; I am currently looking at Data Domain as a possible VTL and de-duplication vender. Can anyone share there experiences with Data Domain with TSM? I am also looking at SEPATON as an "out of band" solut; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-10/msg00184.html (12,090 bytes)
25. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and Data Domain (score: 1): Author: "Lepre, James" <jlepre AT SOLIXINC DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:11:27 -0400; I curently have the quantum DXI 5500 setup with Tivoli and it is performing fantastic. However, since this is a new product you will face some growing pains. What I like is that it does hardware comp; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-10/msg00185.html (13,322 bytes)
26. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and Data Domain (score: 1): Author: Dirk Kastens <Dirk.Kastens AT UNI-OSNABRUECK DOT DE>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 08:45:38 +0200; Kenneth, Bradberry, Kenneth schrieb: I am currently looking at Data Domain as a possible VTL and de-duplication vender. Can anyone share there experiences with Data Domain with TSM? We just tested a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-10/msg00205.html (12,704 bytes)
27. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and Data Domain (score: 1): Author: Cory Heikel <cheikel AT PSU DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:37:37 -0400; We are averaging about 11/1 with data domain on a mix of data. One thing we found was the need to update a setting for tsm tape marker parameter, which almost doubled our performance. Cory Heikel Tiv; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-10/msg00211.html (12,864 bytes)
28. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and Data Domain (score: 1): Author: William Jean <wjean AT GLASSHOUSE DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:03:01 -0400; Can you share the details of the tape marker setting? We are averaging about 11/1 with data domain on a mix of data. One thing we found was the need to update a setting for tsm tape marker parameter,; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-10/msg00212.html (13,298 bytes)
29. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and Data Domain (score: 1): Author: Cory Heikel <cheikel AT PSU DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:33:45 -0400; The command can be different depending on which version of the software you are running. In the latest version it is: option set marker-type {nw1 | cv1 | tsm1 | tsm2 | eti1 | hpdp1 | none} Set the ta; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-10/msg00213.html (14,272 bytes)
30. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM and Data Domain (score: 1): Author: Curtis Preston <cpreston AT GLASSHOUSE DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:22:50 -0400; That would match what I've heard most often. While users of most other backup products are seeing an average of 20:1 on most data, that ratio relies on having full backups to compare against. TSM's p; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-10/msg00219.html (14,659 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 30
Page: [1] [2]