Author: Timothy Hughes <Timothy.Hughes AT OIT.STATE.NJ DOT US>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:56:51 -0400
Well, on that note I have a "possible stupid question" does anyone think it's will be possible for a customer to have a choice of staying with the current TSM database if they liked they way it is an
No, but you will have the option to stay with tsm v5.5 at least until tsm 6.2 has been released. My bet is that since 6.1 is a really big step (redesign, reimplementation of major parts of tsm), 6.2
Author: Timothy Hughes <Timothy.Hughes AT OIT.STATE.NJ DOT US>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:49:25 -0400
Well, on that note I have a "possible stupid question" does anyone think it's will be possible for a customer to have a choice of staying with the current TSM database if they liked they way it is a
I intend to very strongly recommend that they incorporate this feature into the new code. The licensing has now gotten so complex, that it makes it very difficult to know whether or not you are in co
Author: "Strand, Neil B." <NBStrand AT LMUS.LEGGMASON DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:12:52 -0400
I looked at the TSM V6 beta and found there will be a license module that determines how many licenses your system will need. After a bit of debugging and reverse engineering, I obtained a snippet of
Timothy, There was a discussion session about this at the Oxford TSM Symposium last fall, facilitated by some folks in TSM Development. I cannot say what will be in the next version of TSM, but I can
Author: Francisco Molero <fmolero AT YAHOO DOT COM>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 04:32:47 -0700
Hello colleagues, TSM being abandoned ? I don't know but IBM 6.1 will have much more functionality than previous versions. IBM has bought two companies FilesX and Diligent . FilesX will be add to
Author: "Hart, Charles A" <charles_hart AT UHC DOT COM>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 07:26:37 -0500
1) With the acquisition of Diligent will the TSM Dedupe still be part of 6.x? With the Diligent Device you can have multiple TSM instances to get a better overall De-Dupe. Example we have one p570 wi
Speeking of lan free, if a VTL can emulate a tape drive, why can't TSM do this? If TSM can simulate a tape drive to the client, the client can do LAN free backup to disk ..... Stef
Author: "Bell, Charles (Chip)" <Chip.Bell AT BHSALA DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:36:11 -0500
During our audit, I was commissioned to perform an exhaustively thorough search of the current backup vendors out there, and I included VTL and de-dupe technologies, etc. NBU or CommVault were a coup
Author: Howard Coles <Howard.Coles AT ARDENTHEALTH DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:13:16 -0500
Sounds like you had the same "people" that I started out with. :-O 'cause I had the same feelings about half way through our audit. See Ya' Howard looking local now. I