Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+SQL\s+2012\s+AlwaysOn\s+database\s+backup\/restore\s+using\s+TDP\s+7\.1\.1\s+under\s+a\s+single\s+nodename\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+SQL\s+2012\s+AlwaysOn\s+database\s+backup\/restore\s+using\s+TDP\s+7\.1\.1\s+under\s+a\s+single\s+nodename\?\s*$/: 165981 ]

Total 165981 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [ADSM-L] nfs mounted tsm storage becoming unavailable (score: 1): Author: Remco Post <r.post AT PLCS DOT NL>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:00:12 +0200; Hi Eric, On AIX there is the iocp, this van apparently perform the formatting for TSM, what you see is that TSM only needs a few moments to format the volume, and from there on IOCP takes over. On un; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00037.html (21,006 bytes)
62. [ADSM-L] Restore Domino database without domino server (score: 1): Author: Steven Langdale <steven.langdale AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:49:59 +0100; Hi all I have some long term archives of Lotus Notes/domino databases, and need one back. Is it possible to recover it straight into a filesystem and not need a working Domino server as the restore t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00038.html (10,819 bytes)
63. Re: [ADSM-L] Restore Domino database without domino server (score: 1): Author: Frank Ramke <ramke AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:22:56 -0400; Hi Steven, Was the database backed up using the Data Protection for Domino client? If so, that client will need a domino server on the same system. "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00039.html (11,552 bytes)
64. Re: [ADSM-L] Unsubscribe (score: 1): Author: Adil Azad <xpert123 AT YAHOO DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 05:47:03 -0700; " Imagination Rules the world " Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Restore Domino database without domino server To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU Received: Thursday, September 10, 2015, 8:22 AM Hi Steven, Was the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00040.html (11,791 bytes)
65. Re: [ADSM-L] nfs mounted tsm storage becoming unavailable (score: 1): Author: "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:36:02 +0000; Hi Shawn! Sparse files are created while the actual storage is allocated when needed. So the actuals disk space is allocated at the moment you are filling your diskpool volumes for the first time. If; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00041.html (21,450 bytes)
66. [ADSM-L] Antwort:Restore Domino database without domino server (score: 1): Author: Markus Engelhard <markus.engelhard AT BUNDESBANK DOT DE>; Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 07:28:19 +0200; Hi Steven, try something like the following, logging into the TSM-server with the baclient using the domino node credentials: -- -- -- -- 1 12/28/2009 22:55:54 API:DominoData xxx.DOMDBS 2 12/29/2009; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00042.html (12,113 bytes)
67. [ADSM-L] very low dedup percent on TDP for SAP archives (score: 1): Author: Robert Ouzen <rouzen AT UNIV.HAIFA.AC DOT IL>; Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 17:34:43 +0000; Hi to all We had to move our clients with TDP for SAP oracle 6.2.1 from our Data Domain to a new storage V7000 with RTC. This Storage V7000_1 is configure with dedup and only from the server side Our; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00043.html (13,112 bytes)
68. Re: [ADSM-L] very low dedup percent on TDP for SAP archives (score: 1): Author: "Lurz, Martin" <Martin.Lurz AT ICFI DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 17:36:00 +0000; I am in class this week. I will be viewing my email in the evenings. For emergency TSM issues, please contact Steve Stackwick.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00044.html (10,665 bytes)
69. [ADSM-L] Missing support for ISP 7.1.3 for SAP and Oracle 12c (score: 1): Author: Markus Engelhard <markus.engelhard AT BUNDESBANK DOT DE>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:06:15 +0200; Dear all, the combination ISP for Enterprise Ressource Planning seems not to support SAP in combination with Oracle12. Anybody an idea when official support will be added? Kind regards, Markus; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00045.html (10,874 bytes)
70. [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools (score: 1): Author: Karel Bos <tsm.wad AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:16:30 +0200; Hi, So we get a new type of storage pools, the directory-container storage pools. These enable TSM to do in flight dedup. But you cannot use any of the following functions with directory-container st; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00046.html (12,268 bytes)
71. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools (score: 1): Author: James Thorne <james.thorne AT IT.OX.AC DOT UK>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:40:37 +0000; Hi Karel. That's the conclusion we came to too. James. Hi, So we get a new type of storage pools, the directory-container storage pools. These enable TSM to do in flight dedup. But you cannot use any; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00047.html (12,716 bytes)
72. Re: [ADSM-L] A few questions about Node Replication (score: 1): Author: Karel Bos <tsm.wad AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:21:21 +0200; Hi, Replicate node is done over the connection you use within the "define server" command. So it is using the TSM server to server connection path. You can define a link on OS level to be dedicated u; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00048.html (16,614 bytes)
73. Re: [ADSM-L] Missing support for ISP 7.1.3 for SAP and Oracle 12c (score: 1): Author: Del Hoobler <hoobler AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:21:49 -0400; Hi Markus, IBM plans to verify DP for SAP with Oracle 12c using the 7.1.3 release that released last week. Once that verification is complete, IBM will update the support web site here: http://www-01; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00049.html (11,914 bytes)
74. Re: [ADSM-L] A few questions about Node Replication (score: 1): Author: Stefan Folkerts <stefan.folkerts AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:51:41 +0200; If you are using a TSM server on Linux I suggest reading about the tc utility for limiting bandwith. It changes the speed of the NIC as presented for applications so there are no dropped/resent packa; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00050.html (17,877 bytes)
75. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools (score: 1): Author: Rick Adamson <RickAdamson AT SEGROCERS DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:23:26 +0000; I may be wrong but from reading the 7.1.3 doco new container approach combined with the inline dedup eliminate the need for some of these processes. Also, where traditionally a "copy" storage pool wa; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00051.html (14,442 bytes)
76. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools (score: 1): Author: "Ryder, Michael S" <michael_s.ryder AT ROCHE DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 10:49:26 -0400; I am very interested in directory-container storage pools. But... If Migration or Move Data are not options, then how does one transition data from existing primary storage pools to a directory-conta; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00052.html (15,997 bytes)
77. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools (score: 1): Author: "Sergio O. Fuentes" <sfuentes AT UMD DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:24:04 +0000; This question is relevant. How do I move from a file devclass stgpool to a directory-container pool. And what's the impact on the DB if I do this? I already had multi-site configured for our environm; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00053.html (17,111 bytes)
78. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools (score: 1): Author: Stefan Folkerts <stefan.folkerts AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 08:48:52 +0200; I believe you can "move data" data into the container pools, you just can't get the data out with traditional methods at the moment but only via TSM node replication. I like the new pool type but the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00054.html (18,337 bytes)
79. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM 7.1.3 and Directory-container storage pools (score: 1): Author: "Ryder, Michael S" <michael_s.ryder AT ROCHE DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 08:43:39 -0400; Thank you for that Stefan. Does anyone have an opportunity to test this? Stefan, what is the specific type of setup you are talking about? Mike On Friday, September 18, 2015, Stefan Folkerts <stefan.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00055.html (19,941 bytes)
80. [ADSM-L] TSM for VE 7.1.2.0 data vs meta question (score: 1): Author: "Schaub, Steve" <Steve_Schaub AT BCBST DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:50:06 +0000; 7.1.2.0 Recently, our meta diskpool filled up, and an admin who didn't know any better saw that it didn't have a downstream tapepool (vtl) so he went ahead and added one, to which the meta started fl; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-09/msg00056.html (11,490 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]