Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+SQL\s+2012\s+AlwaysOn\s+database\s+backup\/restore\s+using\s+TDP\s+7\.1\.1\s+under\s+a\s+single\s+nodename\?\s*$/: 165981 ]

Total 165981 documents matching your query.

261. Re: [ADSM-L] Disk layout for AIX (score: 1)
Author: "Rhodes, Richard L." <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:15:17 +0000
The concurrency I'm aware of is at the hdisk/lun level. There's a num_cmd_elems at on the fcs adapter which we set to 2k, and then queue_depth on the hdisk. That's why spreading I/O across as many hd
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00060.html (14,465 bytes)

262. Re: [ADSM-L] Re: Disk layout for AIX (score: 1)
Author: David Bronder <david-bronder AT UIOWA DOT EDU>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:23:51 -0500
Same number of LUNs in fewer VGs, or fewer LUNs, too? The queuing concern makes it sound like fewer LUNs. If so, as Rick says, that's also where your I/O concurrency would suffer. If it's the same nu
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00061.html (15,785 bytes)

263. Re: [ADSM-L] Disk layout for AIX (score: 1)
Author: "Rhodes, Richard L." <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:20:29 +0000
What seems like not that long ago we ran our databases on JBOD disks (disks if 250m to 1gb). We setup oracle per design - logs on one disk, db files on another, redo logs on another, archive logs on
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00062.html (18,886 bytes)

264. [ADSM-L] TDP for Exchange 2010 7.1.x (score: 1)
Author: "Sergio O. Fuentes" <sfuentes AT UMD DOT EDU>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:05:12 +0000
Hello, Does anyone have any idea if for TDP Exchange backups, one can include/exclude based on LOG or Database file specifications. I'm looking for a way to tell TSM not to dedup on LOG Files, but to
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00063.html (11,123 bytes)

265. Re: [ADSM-L] Re: Disk layout for AIX (score: 1)
Author: Remco Post <r.post AT PLCS DOT NL>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 23:52:23 +0200
on AIX more LUNs/hdisks is better. There are some resources allocated per hdisk, where you want more. Set up 4 or 8 VG's for database. Growing database filesystems is easier than adding more. Op 15 j
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00064.html (16,806 bytes)

266. Re: [ADSM-L] Virtualmountpoint not working (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 06:43:25 -0400
Hi Eric, I ran a test of this on an RHEL 6 x86_64 system using TSM client version 7.1.2. I added "virtualmountpoint /dev" to my dsm.sys file, then ran an incremental backup (dsmc i). It backed up all
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00065.html (33,818 bytes)

267. Re: [ADSM-L] Virtualmountpoint not working (score: 1)
Author: "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:11:46 +0000
Hi Andy! I don't know what happened on the host but all of a sudden it seems to work... Of course nobody did change anything on the host and I didn't change anything either. Very frustrating but anyw
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00066.html (35,838 bytes)

268. [ADSM-L] Journal Based Backup on RHEL5 (score: 1)
Author: "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 13:57:14 +0000
Hi TSM-ers! I'm trying to install the 7.1 TSM client on one of our RHEL5 servers but I receive an error during the dependency check for one of the rpm's: rpmlib(FileDigests) is needed by TIVsm-filepa
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00067.html (12,813 bytes)

269. Re: [ADSM-L] Journal Based Backup on RHEL5 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Prix <mp AT RS6000.DARKTECH DOT ORG>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 18:28:12 +0200
Eric, as per documentation: <http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGSG7_7.1.0/com.ibm.itsm.client.doc/t_inst_linuxx86client.html> build you own TIVsm-filepath-7.1.2-0-*.rpm by following the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00068.html (13,855 bytes)

270. Re: [ADSM-L] Journal Based Backup on RHEL5 (score: 1)
Author: "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 06:57:40 +0000
Hi Michael! From the chapter you are referring to: If none of these packages matches your Linux version, you must compile Filepath from source code. The Linux Filepath kernel module is licensed pursu
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00069.html (15,977 bytes)

271. [ADSM-L] Drive serial (score: 1)
Author: "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:09:48 +0000
Hi guys! I haven't had much experience with physical tape drives (we are using DD VTL's only) but recently I installed a few stand-alone IBM LTO5 drives to be able to externalize TSM data on request.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00070.html (12,213 bytes)

272. Re: [ADSM-L] Drive serial (score: 1)
Author: "McWilliams, Eric" <emcwilliams AT MEDSYNERGIES DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:32:35 +0000
Try this command. It may be different if your TSM is not installed in the default location. c:\program files\tivoli\tsm\server\tsmdlst.exe Eric McWilliams Hi guys! I haven't had much experience with
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00071.html (13,879 bytes)

273. Re: [ADSM-L] Drive serial (score: 1)
Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 08:48:09 -0400
The info is the same. digits of the drive serial number: 8:43:30 AM SUN : QUERY DRIVE TS3500-COPY 78A073E f=d Library Name: TS3500-COPY Drive Name: 78A073E Device Type: 3592 On-Line: Yes Read Formats
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00072.html (15,818 bytes)

274. Re: [ADSM-L] Drive serial (score: 1)
Author: "Arbogast, Warren K" <warbogas AT IU DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:02:50 +0000
Keep in mind that when a drive is replaced on a 3584 the old serial number is preserved, despite the replacement drive having a different serial on its sticker. The serial number is on the cannister
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00073.html (17,360 bytes)

275. [ADSM-L] FCM with TDP VMware and registering VM's (score: 1)
Author: Bas van Kampen <b.vankampen AT INTERCONNECT DOT NL>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:04:21 +0000
Hello, We use FCM for VMware with TSM offloading (with IBM SVC). After mounting of the flashcopy snapshot to the auxiliary ESX host, fcm (vmcli) registers the VM's to the ESX host. This is not concur
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00074.html (10,873 bytes)

276. Re: [ADSM-L] Drive serial (score: 1)
Author: "Loon, EJ van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:51:22 +0000
Great, thanks again for your help guys! Kind regards, Eric van Loon AF/KLM Storage Engineering The info is the same. From my TSM server (FYI the drive names in TSM is the same as the last-6 digits of
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00075.html (17,597 bytes)

277. Re: [ADSM-L] FCM with TDP VMware and registering VM's (score: 1)
Author: Del Hoobler <hoobler AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:25:31 -0400
Hello Bas, This is the current design. If this is something you would like to see enhanced, please open an RFE: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/?BRAND_ID=90 Del -- "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <A
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00076.html (11,920 bytes)

278. [ADSM-L] can't access share with nested AD groups (score: 1)
Author: "Rhodes, Richard L." <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 17:18:00 +0000
IBM N3220 - 2857-A22 (NetApp FAS2240-2) Data ONTAP Release 8.1.2P1 7-Mode We are in the process of upgrading our AD system from Win 2008 to Win 2012R2. After doing this, some CIFS shares cannot be ac
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00077.html (11,610 bytes)

279. Re: [ADSM-L] can't access share with nested AD groups (score: 1)
Author: "Rhodes, Richard L." <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:02:58 +0000
We found the problem. The 2012 AD uses compressed SID's which OnTap 8.1.2P1 doesn't support. Support was added in 8.1.2P2. A work-around we found on MS website works good, but requires the Windows us
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00078.html (11,965 bytes)

280. [ADSM-L] Moving DB , LOG , ARCHLOG (score: 1)
Author: Robert Ouzen <rouzen AT UNIV.HAIFA.AC DOT IL>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:42:57 +0000
Hello I am in stage of moving my DB , Activelog and Archivelog from old storage to faster storage, DB on SSD disks I am wonder if I can do it in one step, meaning: 1. Creating new volumes for DB on S
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00079.html (11,975 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu