Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+SQL\s+2012\s+AlwaysOn\s+database\s+backup\/restore\s+using\s+TDP\s+7\.1\.1\s+under\s+a\s+single\s+nodename\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+SQL\s+2012\s+AlwaysOn\s+database\s+backup\/restore\s+using\s+TDP\s+7\.1\.1\s+under\s+a\s+single\s+nodename\?\s*$/: 165981 ]

Total 165981 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [ADSM-L] TSM server V7.1.1.300 (score: 1): Author: Paul Zarnowski <psz1 AT CORNELL DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:07:28 -0400; Robert, We upgrade our servers from 7.1.1.108 to 7.1.1.301 about 2 weeks ago, without incident or the side effects that others have seen. Our expiration runs in the same time as it did prior to the u; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00020.html (11,934 bytes)
222. Re: [ADSM-L] ANR2033E Command failed - lock conflict (score: 1): Author: "Gee, Norman" <Norman.Gee AT LC.CA DOT GOV>; Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 16:20:52 +0000; I have been running 4 streams in parallel against a single NAS server. There are parameters within the NAS server that specified how many background tasks that can be started. I use a single master s; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00021.html (12,804 bytes)
223. Re: [ADSM-L] Issues with Client Acceptor on 2012 server (score: 1): Author: Rick Adamson <RickAdamson AT SEGROCERS DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:20:24 +0000; Zoltan, Asking the obvious....are you running the CLI "as Administrator" ? -Rick Adamson A Windows admin just installed the 7.1.2.0 client (fresh install, not an upgrade) on a 2012 server and has thi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00022.html (13,516 bytes)
224. Re: [ADSM-L] Issues with Client Acceptor on 2012 server (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 13:42:51 -0400; Passed on to the Windows admin and the response was: The service is being run as a domain account. Believe it or not, that did the trick. Simple, yet I overlooked it. The domain account was not a mem; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00023.html (15,301 bytes)
225. Re: [ADSM-L] ANR2033E Command failed - lock conflict (score: 1): Author: Grant Street <Grant.Street AT AL.COM DOT AU>; Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 10:07:04 +1000; Hi Nick It is a bit cumbersome to do parallel backups, but it does work. Essentially you run a backup node process per NAS "volume" depending on your NAS's definition of "volume". This is tricky when; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00024.html (12,957 bytes)
226. Re: [ADSM-L] ANR2033E Command failed - lock conflict (score: 1): Author: Grant Street <Grant.Street AT AL.COM DOT AU>; Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 10:08:53 +1000; Cheers I might see if redoing the master script to spawn sub scripts will help.... Grant On 08/07/15 02:20, Gee, Norman wrote: I have been running 4 streams in parallel against a single NAS server. T; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00025.html (13,108 bytes)
227. Re: [ADSM-L] ANR2033E Command failed - lock conflict (score: 1): Author: Grant Street <Grant.Street AT AL.COM DOT AU>; Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 10:41:23 +1000; Sorry...... to clarify "If you only have two volumes you can only ever create a maximum of two streams." It is a bit cumbersome to do parallel backups, but it does work. Essentially you run a backup; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00026.html (13,290 bytes)
228. Re: [ADSM-L] ANR2033E Command failed - lock conflict (score: 1): Author: Ron Delaware <ron.delaware AT US.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:50:25 -0700; Grant, To tackle your problem of multiple backups at the same time you can carve up your NAS server (as long as you are using volumes and directories and NOT volumes and Trees) using virtualmountpoin; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00027.html (17,593 bytes)
229. [ADSM-L] Tape Encryption (score: 1): Author: "McWilliams, Eric" <emcwilliams AT MEDSYNERGIES DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:50:14 +0000; We are currently encrypting our data as it is being written to tape. The auditors want to know how the encryption keys are managed. All I can find is that the keys are managed by the Tivoli Storage M; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00028.html (13,537 bytes)
230. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape Encryption (score: 1): Author: Thomas Denier <Thomas.Denier AT JEFFERSON DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 20:01:25 +0000; The Redbook "IBM Tivoli Storage Manager: Building a Secure Environment" (SG24-7505-00) goes into a bit more detail. A stolen storage pool tape is not, in and of itself, a security exposure; the thief; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00029.html (15,104 bytes)
231. Re: [ADSM-L] Tape Encryption (score: 1): Author: David Ehresman <david.ehresman AT LOUISVILLE DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 20:01:28 +0000; The TSM Redbook found at http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247505.pdf has a chapter on TSM managed tape encryption and how it is handled. David We are currently encrypting our data as it is; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00030.html (14,115 bytes)
232. [ADSM-L] tdp for ms sql client download (score: 1): Author: "Lee, Gary" <glee AT BSU DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 14:14:43 +0000; Trying to find this client. Where does it live? We are licensed for tsm extended edition, tdp for databases, hsm, and other stuff.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00031.html (10,532 bytes)
233. Re: [ADSM-L] tdp for ms sql client download (score: 1): Author: Nick Marouf <marouf AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 08:23:15 -0600; The best place is Passport Advantage http://www-01.ibm.com/software/passportadvantage/pao_customer.html; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00032.html (11,008 bytes)
234. Re: [ADSM-L] tdp for ms sql client download (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 11:08:27 -0400; I can find the latest (7.1.2.0) maintenance release here: ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com//storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/tivoli-data-protection/ntsql/v712/windows but you have to have t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00033.html (12,285 bytes)
235. [ADSM-L] Issued with TDP SQL 7.1.2.0 and 2014 SQL server (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 11:44:22 -0400; My SQL guy is having some interesting problems/crashes with the latest and greatest SQL/TDP He is running TSM client 7.1.2.0 and was running 7.1.1.2 TDP SQL. They he started getting error messages an; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00034.html (13,484 bytes)
236. Re: [ADSM-L] Issued with TDP SQL 7.1.2.0 and 2014 SQL server (score: 1): Author: "J. Pohlmann" <jpohlmann AT SHAW DOT CA>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 09:39:41 -0700; Zoltan, you are experiencing APAR IT09192 - there is an e-fix for the crash at program termination. Please not the local fix - ignore the crash. There is no patch yet. Joerg Pohlmann My SQL guy is ha; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00035.html (14,109 bytes)
237. Re: [ADSM-L] Issued with TDP SQL 7.1.2.0 and 2014 SQL server (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:45:35 -0400; Thank you for the information. Unfortunately I can not get to the pertinent information. When I Google that APAR, the link takes me to the IBM Support Portal and when I attempt to sign-in, I get a "O; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00036.html (12,291 bytes)
238. Re: [ADSM-L] Issued with TDP SQL 7.1.2.0 and 2014 SQL server (score: 1): Author: "J. Pohlmann" <jpohlmann AT SHAW DOT CA>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 09:55:17 -0700; Hi Zoltan. Here is a clip of the APAR: IT09192: DATABASE BACKUPS USING DATA PROTECTION FOR SQL CAN CRASH DURING PROCESSING WITH REFERENCES TO MODULE CLR.DLL Description When attempting a legacy backu; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00037.html (17,167 bytes)
239. Re: [ADSM-L] Issued with TDP SQL 7.1.2.0 and 2014 SQL server (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 13:08:20 -0400; Thank you for the details. That definitely seems to be our problem. Will see if I can get through and subscribe for when the APAR is resolved. You said there was a "hot fix". How would we get it? --; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00038.html (19,490 bytes)
240. Re: [ADSM-L] Issued with TDP SQL 7.1.2.0 and 2014 SQL server (score: 1): Author: "J. Pohlmann" <jpohlmann AT SHAW DOT CA>; Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 10:39:52 -0700; You will need to open a PMR with IBM and reference this APAR. Best regards, Joerg Thank you for the details. That definitely seems to be our problem. Will see if I can get through and subscribe for w; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2015-07/msg00039.html (19,961 bytes)

Current List: 221 - 240
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]