Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+7\.1\.8\/8\.1\.3\s+Security\s+Upgrade\s+Install\s+Issues\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+7\.1\.8\/8\.1\.3\s+Security\s+Upgrade\s+Install\s+Issues\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [ADSM-L] 7.1.8/8.1.3 Security Upgrade Install Issues (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 14:36:39 -0500; I would assume the server license as a minimum. Every time we have jumped a version, there is a new server licensing part/files and we have to do a REGister LICense FILE=*.lic on the server after it; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2017-11/msg00059.html (27,121 bytes)
22. Re: [ADSM-L] 7.1.8/8.1.3 Security Upgrade Install Issues (score: 1): Author: "Sergio O. Fuentes" <sfuentes AT UMD DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:49:36 -0500; Zoltan is correct... you have to install the license package from 8.1.0.0, I believe. Otherwise you'll get nasty messages in the actlog. Though I'm not sure if it actually breaks functionality. If th; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2017-11/msg00060.html (29,839 bytes)
23. Re: [ADSM-L] 7.1.8/8.1.3 Security Upgrade Install Issues (score: 1): Author: Sasa Drnjevic <Sasa.Drnjevic AT SRCE DOT HR>; Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 23:09:25 +0100; Thank you both :-) Now I see what you meant. I did that the other day when upgrading v7.1.7.0 to v8.1.0.0 And I did a test from v8.1.0.0 to v8.1.1.0 and even that small step included new licenses, so; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2017-11/msg00061.html (31,524 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 23
Page: [1] [2]