Author: Bluejay Adametz <bluejay AT fujifilm DOT com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 10:30:56 -0400
You're not alone... I'm in basically the same situation. Windows is notoriously difficult to recover in it's entirety. Near as I can tell, there are two options to effect a full recovery from just b
Author: Dennis Peacock <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 07:41:59 -0700
Well I can't do BMR setup every time I hope to recover a Windows box. We have HUNDREDS of backup clients spanning Unix, Linux, and Windows. Maybe hundreds is a bit of an understatement because I do k
NBU 6.1 running on Linux, multiple media servers using a Data Domain VTL. We are using a Data Domain for our vtl and are having an issue with the Data Domain that causes it to panic and boot. The pro
There's at least one knowledge-base article on how to do that, but I don't have its number handy. :-( My too-old NetBackup experience (i.e., I expect there to be better/newer info now), is that if y
Hello Dennis, I have found the following: http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH56473 It's not for solaris but it has the restore procedure in details. Actually, I have n
Additionally to this one, I prefer the BMR Option. Imagine the effort to install a new machine (OS, patch level etc) in order to perform a full restore. Using BMR, you need a server to host the boot
Author: "Chapman, Scott" <Scott.Chapman AT icbc DOT com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:22:51 +0000
BMR doesn't support EFI before 7.6.0.1 though... --Original Message-- From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Nik
Author: "Scott Jacobson" <SJACOBSO AT novell DOT com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:53:41 -0600
If 1) you are at v 7.6.0.1 and 2) you have a vSphere environment you can: Select the new policy type FlashBackup-Windows and then select the Hyper-V server. I've not yet tested this but it is on my r
Author: Dennis Peacock <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 08:07:42 -0700
I have an odd problem....but aren't most of my problems "odd"? :) blist gives large file sizes in KBytes.....I need to "correctly" convert those file sizes listed in KBytes to the real Unix/Linux fil
NBU 6.1 running on Linux, multiple media servers using a Data Domain VTL. We are migrating from one Data Domain VTL to another. We have both defined to NetBackup and can do backups to either. I can s
Author: "Iverson, Jerald" <Jerald.Iverson AT invesco DOT com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 15:55:46 +0000
the file hasn't grown 20kb since the backup? what version of netbackup? what does cat_convert -dump on the backup.f file | grep filename show? thanks, jerald --Original Message-- From: veritas-bu-bou
Author: Dennis Peacock <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 09:31:09 -0700
Netbackup 7.5.0.5 Files are not growing during backup. If you take this number: 2775784693 and divide it by 1024, you will get the exact number Netbackup posted in bplist output. The problem is cover
Author: Patrick <netbackup AT whelan-consulting.co DOT uk>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:54:06 +0000
The problem is that the number is rounded. 2775784693 / 1024 = 2710727.23925781250000000000 2710727.23925781250000000000 * 1024 = 2775784693.00000000000000000000 2710727 * 1024 = 2775784448 _________
Nie ma mnie w pracy do 28-03-2014. W dniach 26-28.03.2014 jestem na szkoleniu. Uwaga: To jest odpowied automatyczna na wiadomo od uytkownika "Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 95, Issue 6" wysano 14/3/26 18:00:
Ive had lots of success restoring Windows 2003 and 2008 file servers using this simple method (all servers were HP Proliant). Havent tried Windows 2012 yet Assuming youre restoring to the same hardwa
Author: pawan ramnani <pawan.ramnani21 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:00:44 +0530
hey guys..........i am currently working on shell script that resolves status code 58 in netbackuptool .............this error is actually coz when server cannot communicate to the client so i am try
Author: Patrick Whelan <Patrick_Whelan AT symantec DOT com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:02 -0800
What is wrong with using /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/bptestnetconn or /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/bptestbpcd ? Many regards, Pat Whelan Principal Remote Product Specialist - NBU Business Critical
Author: Michael Graff Andersen <mian71 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:13:32 +0100
Hey Pawan I would start with basic network stuff, like is name resloving working between the machines (ping, hosts file, nslookup) If thats looks ok I would continue with bptestbcpd if you are
Author: Venkatraghavan Marisamy <venkat.marisamy AT in.ibm DOT com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 20:35:27 +0530
Hi Jerald, The Upgrade to NetBackup 7.5 moves the header file of a netbackup catalog image into the EMM and replaces it with a .lck file . 7.5 Upgrade, after the binary upgrade is a 2 step process. P
Author: pranav batra <pranav_venture AT hotmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:50:38 +0530
Hello Geeks ! We have run into a major issue . Our Linux master server "2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.x86_64" running on Netbackup 7.5.0.6 hangs everytime we run nbstlutil to fetch any data regarding the SLP's.