Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+What\s+new\s+feature\s+are\s+you\s+waiting\s+for\?\s*$/: 92 ]

Total 92 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for? (score: 1)
Author: Ryan Novosielski <novosirj AT umdnj DOT edu>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:55:54 -0500
Dan, Any chance you could provide some config examples in another thread? I tried to set this up so I could have a separate catalog that for production backups vs. staff machines, but for whatever re
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-11/msg00182.html (15,962 bytes)

82. Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for? (score: 1)
Author: Tilman Schmidt <t.schmidt AT phoenixsoftware DOT de>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 11:23:53 +0100
Am 05.11.2008 22:03 schrieb Dan Langille: I'm sorry but I'm starting to have serious doubts about that. I have been trying for a long time and in many different ways to get that to work, and each tim
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-11/msg00184.html (15,523 bytes)

83. Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for? (score: 1)
Author: Arno Lehmann <al AT its-lehmann DOT de>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:23:10 +0100
Hi, I'm writing as a Bacula Systems founder here. We have absolutely no problem creating code. Sure, our main objective is providing service, but creating add-ony, plugins, new features, or whatever
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-11/msg00188.html (17,590 bytes)

84. Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for? (score: 1)
Author: Ralf Gross <Ralf-Lists AT ralfgross DOT de>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:38:40 +0100
Doytchin Spiridonov schrieb: The problem in my case was that the affected fs was almost full when it crashed. So there was no space left for the additional 20% deleted/moved/renamed files.... Ralf --
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-11/msg00190.html (15,064 bytes)

85. Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for? (score: 1)
Author: Erik Logtenberg <erik AT logtenberg DOT eu>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:34:30 +0100
I would very much like to see the possibility to make only incremental backups, no more full backups required. The main point is to (dramatically) decrease the needed bandwidth, which makes the diffe
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-11/msg00196.html (18,225 bytes)

86. Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for? (score: 1)
Author: Arno Lehmann <al AT its-lehmann DOT de>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:05:55 +0100
Hi, Synthetic full backups or consolidation. A feature that is in the development queue and could (in my opinion) be one of the major new things in a 3.1 release, i.e. perhaps next year. To learn mor
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-11/msg00203.html (16,121 bytes)

87. Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for? (score: 1)
Author: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 22:14:08 -0500
What can I say? I'm not responsible for people not answering. Nor is anybody else. That's how it works. Or more precisely, doesn't. I don't. I'm repeating what I was told Work with Bacula, not agains
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-11/msg00209.html (15,816 bytes)

88. Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for? (score: 1)
Author: "John Drescher" <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 22:55:25 -0500
I can say I try to get involved in as many of these type of questions as I can handle. The biggest reasons after asking for a config or log and then silence from me is I do not see anything that is
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-11/msg00210.html (15,883 bytes)

89. Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for? (score: 1)
Author: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 23:55:15 -0500
Exactly. We are all volunteers where. Helping out, when, and if, we can. We do this in our *spare* time. Sometimes I know the answer and don't answer because I know it's a pretty simple question that
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-11/msg00211.html (16,504 bytes)

90. Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for? (score: 1)
Author: Tilman Schmidt <t.schmidt AT phoenixsoftware DOT de>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:02:56 +0100
Sure. I'm not complaining about that. Sorry if my answer came across as such. But the fact that nobody could come up with an answer might indicate that the answer doesn't exist. Sure, and I'm trying
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-11/msg00213.html (17,150 bytes)

91. Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for? (score: 1)
Author: Erik Logtenberg <erik AT logtenberg DOT eu>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 11:41:34 +0100
Hi, What kind of funding are we talking about here? Erik. -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK &
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-11/msg00218.html (14,038 bytes)

92. Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for? (score: 1)
Author: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:13:59 -0500
Or more simply, it could mean that the people who know have not answered. :) Well, for what it's worth: that seems to be how people have interpreted it. The intention of this thread was "what new fea
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2008-11/msg00219.html (16,884 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu