Author: Jean-Louis Martineau <martineau AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:39:45 -0400
stan wrote: I know I have asked this before, but I can't recall getting a definative answer. Is port usage different between 2.5.x and 2.6 clients, when talkimng to a 2.6 server? No, the same port ar
Geting access to that is um, chalenging. I may be better off setting up a network i have control of in the lab, and see if I can reproduce the problem there. After all, we are not _certain- it's a fi
A useful thought, but it does not appear this is the problem $ pstat -T | grep open 169/7030 open files $ -- One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking zero, they had no
Author: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:15:26 -0400
Its capabilities will be expanded -- it will be able to re-assemble and re-split dumps, so the source and destination volume sizes need not match. The command will still be separate from the usual am
Author: "Hugh E Cruickshank" <hugh AT forsoft DOT com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:51:02 -0700
Amanda 2.6.1p1 on RHEL 5.3 Hi All: I am attempting to add the following entries to an exiting disklist file: pgips2 / always-full pgips2 /boot always-full When I run the amcheck I get the following e
Hello Hugh, Are you using dump (instead of tar) per chance? If so, try using the device name instead of the mount point. If using LVM, this is the full LVM "device name", ie. /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-L
Author: "Hugh E Cruickshank" <hugh AT forsoft DOT com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:38:34 -0700
Hi Paul: For this particular entry I am using dump by default. I have tried your suggestion and amcheck now run without error. Thank you very much. Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Softwa
Sorry to take so long to get back to everyone on this. I had one of my contractors decide he did not want to work, so I have been trying to do his job, and mine :-( In any case, today I took a crosso
I recently tried to upgrade several of my OpenBSD machines to 4.5 (X86). I also upgraded the Amanda clients on them to 2.6.1, which I have working on FreeBSD, Linux, Solaris 5, Solaris 8, and HP-UX.
Author: Chris Hoogendyk <hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:54:06 -0400
Despite my best efforts, I have yet to get the OpenBSD 4.5 clients to back up correctly. All the configurations are set up to match what has been done on FreeBSD. Amcheck works fine, and when I star
Thanks, I was just thinking of doing that. Unfortunately the OpenBSD machines were not all alike (ah, such is life) and were of various OS and Amanda versions. We have also decided to not go beyond 2
One more thing thta's going to make this df`ificult is that the contractor I had do this upgrade installed 86 OpenBSD, when we had AMD64 previously. So my old binaries are not any good either :-( --
Well, this is getting interesting. I have a working client. It's 2.5.0p1. And it's using BSD auth, rather than bsdtcp, and at the moment I am not using compression. But it works on OpenBSD 4.5. This
Thanks for the sugestion. As you will se from another posting, I did get the version that I had working on the earlier OpenBSD machines (2.5.0p1) working with the 4.5 OS. Now, mayve I can move foward
Author: Christopher <chrismcc AT pricegrabber DOT com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:18:29 -0700
Hello... rhel5-shell> cat /etc/rc.local /bin/chmod 640 /dev/root /bin/chown root:disk /dev/root touch /var/lock/subsys/local -- Christopher McCrory "The guy that keeps the servers running" chrismcc A
Author: Christopher <chrismcc AT pricegrabber DOT com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:27:13 -0700
Hello... I tried out application-tool over the last couple days to solve a netapp snapshot vs. gtar --one-file-system problem. A couple notes: http://wiki.zmanda.com/man/amgtar.8.html has an example,
Hi there, I am still trying to get to the bottom of this. I have some servers running Debian Etch. They have been fine with amanda for a very long time now. I just ran an apt-get upgrade to apply som
Author: "Gunnarsson, Gunnar" <Gunnar.Gunnarsson AT svk DOT se>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:18:42 +0200
Good working Dustin. One more question on amvault what would be the result of calling 'amvault latest' for a giving configuration - I would expect to get the most resent 0 dump on each volume in the