Author: Michael Devenney <mdevenney AT RETSD.MB DOT CA>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 12:43:42 +0000
I am running TSM 6.3.5.0 on Windows 2008 R2. I have a Windows 2008 R2 file server that has a 4.3 TB user homedir folder. It is currently taking 22 hours to back it up. There are several folders locat
Author: Erwann SIMON <erwann.simon AT FREE DOT FR>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:54:47 +0200
Hello Michael, Considering the number of objects backed up compared to the number of objects inspected, setting the resource utilization to 10 should not be helpfull. Becasue the comparison is always
Author: "Nixon, Charles D. (David)" <cdnixon AT CARILIONCLINIC DOT ORG>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 13:01:21 +0000
Is it possible to organize the home directories into something like A-F, G-L,... Then use virtual mount points so that the TSM client views each of these groupings as a separate volume and thus the w
Author: Erwann SIMON <erwann.simon AT FREE DOT FR>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:23:16 +0200
Hello Charles, Virtualmountpoint can't be used on Windows, it's an option that's only available Unix (and Linux). -- Best regards / Cordialement / Erwann SIMON -- Mail original -- De: "Charles D. Nix
Author: Erwann SIMON <erwann.simon AT FREE DOT FR>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:04:20 +0200
Aou can follow this Andy Raibeck's tip : http://www.backupcentral.com/phpBB2/two-way-mirrors-of-external-mailing-lists-3/ibm-tsm-13/virtual-mount-points-for-windows-clients-101311/ For non-Unix/Linux
Author: Francisco Molero <fmolero AT YAHOO DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:56:10 +0000
The best solution is to use FCM for windows NTFS. De: Rainer Tammer <tsm AT SPG.SCHULERGROUP DOT COM> Para: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU Enviado: Jueves 1 de octubre de 2015 16:48 Asunto: Re: Backing
Author: Michael Devenney <mdevenney AT RETSD.MB DOT CA>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:18:56 +0000
Hello Erwann I will install Journal based backup to see if it speeds up the backup time. I am currently using a share name to backup the homedir folder. Thanks for the help. Michael Devenney Aou can
I thought I had this figured out but keep getting the wrong results. This is a W2K8 box with 7.1.2 client. I want to apply a different management class to one directory and all of its sub-directories
Hi Zoltan, I think the documentation around include/exclude wildcarding is very confusing, but here is what I think you need to do: include ?:\Software\ClickCommerce\Backup\...\* 15DAYS While I canno
I'm a member of the information development team that produces the server documentation. I'd like to share some information about the omission of the Administrator's Guide from V7.1.3 documentation.
Thanks Clare, I was just wondering where the pdf was for the 7.1.3 Admin Guide. Now I know! -- Paul Zarnowski Ph: 607-255-4757 Assistant Director for Storage Services Fx: 607-255-8521 IT at Cornell /
Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:25:39 -0400
Hi Zoltan, Some things to check 1. Has the policy set with that management class has been activated? 2. Does the management class have a backup copy group? 3. Is the node doing the backup a member of
The MC isn't the issue. It is the assignment of it. I went to the client and brought up a restore window to see what MC was applied / bound to files backed up (as well as rebound when it was changed)
I have seen documentation both ways and sometimes including both. This statement from http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/TSMC/SH26-4117-01/en_US/HTML/ans60013.htm To specify a management class n
Author: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 10:21:27 -0400
Hi Zoltan, Whether you use * or ? for the drive letter does not matter. The specific problems you are seeing are not quite clear to me (would be nice to have examples that show what you are seeing ve
You can see MC's from the server by doing a 'select' on the 'backups' table. E.g., select * from backups where node_name='NODENAME' -- Paul Zarnowski Ph: 607-255-4757 Assistant Director for Storage S
Some of the documentation appears to not be platform specific, which causes ambiguity and problems. The first include (include * managall) would be appropriate for a Unix system. I'm not sure it is a
Author: Skylar Thompson <skylar2 AT U.WASHINGTON DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 09:19:19 -0700
I would caution against doing this if you have a large number of objects stored in TSM, where "large" is sort of nebulous depending on your TSM server specs and tolerance for database thrashing. Unfo
Yes, good caution Skylar. Our server is robust enough that we don't have issues doing this anymore, but I do recall the days where we used to. -- Paul Zarnowski Ph: 607-255-4757 Assistant Director fo