Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Lost\s+in\s+TSM\s+licensing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Lost\s+in\s+TSM\s+licensing\s*$/: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

41. [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1): Author: Bill Mansfield <Bill.Mansfield AT US.LOGICALIS DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 08:23:23 -0400; IBM does have a tool that properly counts CPUs and cores for value unit licensing calculations. It's called Tivoli License Compliance Manager. Load an(other) agent on all of your TSM systems and peri; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00511.html (13,181 bytes)
42. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1): Author: "Kauffman, Tom" <KauffmanT AT NIBCO DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:38:14 -0400; Well, that would be a good start, except that it's about $26/CPU too high a price. And if it requires any of the rest of the Tivoli monitoring structure to work, it wouldn't be viable anyway. It does; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00515.html (14,406 bytes)
43. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1): Author: "Bell, Charles (Chip)" <Chip.Bell AT BHSALA DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:25:29 -0500; The silence is... ECHO echo echo <chirp> --Original Message-- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of Schaub, Steve Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 1:30 PM To:; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00516.html (15,928 bytes)
44. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1): Author: Jim Zajkowski <jamesez AT UMICH DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:47:09 -0400; List price about $26/CPU. That's gotta be the funniest thing I've heard all day. --Jim; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00517.html (12,962 bytes)
45. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1): Author: Angus Macdonald <Angus.Macdonald AT NWW-TR.WALES.NHS DOT UK>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:48:35 +0100; And how does one go about purchasing this CPU-counting tool without knowing how many CPUs to license it for? IBM does have a tool that properly counts CPUs and cores for value unit licensing calculat; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00518.html (13,011 bytes)
46. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1): Author: "Gill, Geoffrey L." <GEOFFREY.L.GILL AT SAIC DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:53:18 -0700; will In other words we have to figure out how many cpu's we have before we can get the tool that will count the cpu's. That's a real help to some I'm sure. Geoff Gill TSM Administrator PeopleSoft Sr; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00519.html (13,322 bytes)
47. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1): Author: "Schaub, Steve" <steve_schaub AT BCBST DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:55:41 -0400; Ensure_license_compliance: Goto Count_cpus Count_cpus: Goto Install_cpu_counter Install_cpu_counter: Goto Ensure_license_compliance IBM does have a tool that properly counts CPUs and cores for value; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00520.html (13,761 bytes)
48. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1): Author: Robert Clark <Robert_Clark AT MAC DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:16:49 -0700; But is TLCM licensed per CPU or by value units? Someone call Dr Who. Maybe a Time Lord could figure it out. IBM does have a tool that properly counts CPUs and cores for value unit licensing calculati; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00522.html (13,208 bytes)
49. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1): Author: Bill Mansfield <Bill.Mansfield AT US.LOGICALIS DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:31:33 -0400; TLCM is priced by value unit, of course. Once you install it it will tell you how much of it you need to buy from IBM. I'm not sure how exactly you get onto the hamster wheel in the first place. Did; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00529.html (12,773 bytes)
50. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1): Author: "Kauffman, Tom" <KauffmanT AT NIBCO DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:39:43 -0400; Hmm -- all my rs-6000 systems that have useable (non-rootvg) disk are already running Oracle. Does this run (using 'run' loosely here) in a Linux environment? Tom Kauffman NIBCO, Inc TLCM is priced b; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00530.html (13,669 bytes)
51. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1): Author: "Allen S. Rout" <asr AT UFL DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:42:41 -0400; ARGH! This is a policy decision, not a technical one. The TSM server will -already- report license compliance, against an obsolete standard. IBM can choose wether the response is to shut down your s; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00538.html (12,977 bytes)
52. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1): Author: "Allen S. Rout" <asr AT UFL DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:45:30 -0400; Is it as easy to run as the TSM admin server? (*koff*) - Allen S. Rout; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00539.html (12,005 bytes)
53. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1): Author: Bill Mansfield <Bill.Mansfield AT US.LOGICALIS DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 09:42:45 -0400; Yes, both SUSE and RH are supported for the TLCM server, along with AIX, Solaris, etc. 3GB RAM for a unified install. There are agents for most of the client OSs supported by TSM. Bill Mansfield Solu; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00546.html (12,382 bytes)
54. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1): Author: Matthew Warren <Matthew_WARREN AT BNPPARIBAS DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:09:28 +0100; I thought this was a joke when I first read it, along with the DB2 and WAS requirement. Internet Bill.Mansfield AT US.LOGICALIS DOT CO M To ADSM-L cc Sent by: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU Subject 29/0; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00547.html (14,254 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 54
Page: [1] [2] [3]