Something simple is getting in your
way. There should not be any duplicate labels in one mib. Support is very
good at cleaning up mib files, You should call Support and open a PMR.
Cordially,
Leslie A. Clark
IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt
Information Technology Services Americas
IBM Global Services
Detroit
"Senthil Kumar Mani"
<Senthil.Mani AT ust-global DOT com>
Sent by: nv-l-bounces AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
03/13/2009 01:53 AM
|
Please respond to
Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com> |
|
|
To
| "Tivoli NetView Discussions"
<nv-l AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| RE: [NV-L] SNMP MIB Labels creating
issues! |
|
I am trying to bring the
Emerson UPS under monitoring for its load. The enterprise ID is 1.3.6.1.4.1.13400.
The MIB I loaded is ITRUST_UPS_UL33.MIB.
I have two problems
1. Inside the
MIB, there are three labels, upsSmartOutput, upsOutputFrequency and upsAdvOutput
all three labels are having same OID .1.3.6.1.4.1.13400.2.1.3.3.4.2. I
don’t know how. But because of this clash, I am not able to bring Emerson
UPS under load monitoring. Whilst Checking nvcollectord.log I see the below
Date:
2009.03.12 18:06:39.851+05:30
Class:
com.tivoli.netview.nvcollector.DataSelection$ResolveMsgDialog
Method:
createCustomArea
Organization: Tivoli
Product:
"Distributed NetView"
Component:
SNMPCollect
ANM00041E Requested
element UPS Monitoring for UST.TVMEMRDTC01.Load Monitoring for Emeson UPS
not found in database.
2. Moreover,
under path .iso.org.dod.internet.private.enterprises.emersonNetworkPower.products,
I see lot of stray labels like hareware, switch, software etc those are
not part of ITRUST MIB. Also after deep dive checking I found these labels
are infact, somehow, migrated from 3Com MIBS.
Hope I conveyed my issue
clear here?
Thanks
Senny
From: nv-l-bounces AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
[mailto:nv-l-bounces AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com] On Behalf Of Leslie Clark
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 3:02 AM
To: Tivoli NetView Discussions
Subject: RE: [NV-L] SNMP MIB Labels creating issues!
Ha Ha. Got it. So which kind of UPS devices are they? APC? Liebert?
The sharing of a particular mib label is not usually a problem in Netview.
The whole oid is usually involved, so it is fully qualified.
iso.org.dod.internet.private.enterprises.<vendor>. and then
vendors are on their own. Where are you running into this duplication?
Cordially,
Leslie A. Clark
IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt
Information Technology Services Americas
IBM Global Services
(248) 552-4968 Voicemail, Fax, Pager
"Senthil Kumar Mani"
<Senthil.Mani AT ust-global DOT com>
Sent by: nv-l-bounces AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
03/12/2009 03:14 PM
|
Please respond to
Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com> |
|
|
To
| "Tivoli NetView Discussions"
<nv-l AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| RE: [NV-L] SNMP MIB Labels creating issues! |
|
Sorry if I confused you!
Yes, in fact I am trying to bring the UPS Device under Netview monitoring
purview for its load and I come across with the peculiar issue as stated
below.
Revert me if you need any further clarity.
Thanks
Senny
From: nv-l-bounces AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com [mailto:nv-l-bounces AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com]
On Behalf Of Leslie Clark
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 8:30 PM
To: Tivoli NetView Discussions
Subject: Re: [NV-L] SNMP MIB Labels creating issues!
Are you on the right forum, Senny? I thought UPS had migrated to ITNM.
Cordially,
Leslie A. Clark
IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt
Information Technology Services Americas
IBM Global Services
Detroit
"Senthil Kumar Mani"
<Senthil.Mani AT ust-global DOT com>
Sent by: nv-l-bounces AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
03/12/2009 09:11 AM
|
Please respond to
Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com> |
|
|
To
| "Tivoli NetView Discussions"
<nv-l AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| [NV-L] SNMP MIB Labels creating issues! |
|
Hi Team,
I observed a peculiar problem in SNMP tree. I just wanted to clarify the
same with you experts.
In SNMP, if I have one object label named say “XYZ” in a MIB and the
same label is found in some other MIBs, then latest loaded MIBs take the
precedence. Meaning, same label is not allowing in SNMP MIB, in other words,
it is allowing but overwriting the old one. Hope I am correct.
If that is the case, I have major problem with the label called “products”,
because almost all MIBs has got this name in common.
Currently I am in the exercise of bringing UPS under monitoring, and the
problem is there are lot of UPS MIB labels found to be common and making
my job more and more tough. I know this is the problem with different vendors
who develops this MIB but any other way out to mitigate this issue?
Your help much appreciated!
Thanks
Senny
_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
internal IBM'ers only)_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
internal IBM'ers only)_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
internal IBM'ers only)
_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
internal IBM'ers only)
|
