nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

[NV-L] snmpCollect vs nvcollectord

2007-05-24 12:00:00
Subject: [NV-L] snmpCollect vs nvcollectord
From: <Blane.Robertson AT capgeminienergy DOT com>
To: <nv-l AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:51:33 -0500

A question to the all-knowing and wise NetViewers out there…

 

I’m about to install NV 7.1.5 (not an upgrade) in our dev environment, and am trying to decide whether to go with the snmpCollect (snmpv1) daemon or the nvcollectord (snmpv1/v2) daemon.  As you probably already know, the latter would involve installing DB2.

 

We do have v2 devices, but won’t they respond to a v1 request?  Is the only reason to go with v2 for the Counter64 capability?

Thanks in advance for your wisdom and input!

 

Peace,

Blane Robertson

Capgemini / Dallas

Enterprise Systems Management/ Capgemini Energy

Office: +1 214 879 1666/ www.us.capgemini.com

 

Whether you think you can, or you think you can’t, you’re right! – Henry Ford

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to 
internal IBM'ers only)
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  RE: [NV-L] Making a smart set based on ip's, Kain, Becki (B.)
Next by Date:  Re: [NV-L] snmpCollect vs nvcollectord, Leslie Clark
Previous by Thread:  [NV-L] Making a smart set based on ip's, Kain, Becki (B.)
Next by Thread:  Re: [NV-L] snmpCollect vs nvcollectord, Leslie Clark
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]