nv-l

RE: [NV-L] Status/Config Polling of non-snmp nodes and netmon performance

2006-08-02 12:31:00
Subject: RE: [NV-L] Status/Config Polling of non-snmp nodes and netmon performance
From: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
To: Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:18:45 -0400
netmon always honors what's in the seedfile

James Shanks
Level 3 Support  for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group


                                                                           
             "Hill, Channing"                                              
             <CHill AT bbandt DOT com                                           
  
             >                                                          To 
             Sent by:                  "Tivoli NetView Discussions"        
             nv-l-bounces@list         <nv-l AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com>           
  
             s.ca.ibm.com                                               cc 
                                                                           
                                                                   Subject 
             08/02/2006 11:19          RE: [NV-L] Status/Config Polling of 
             AM                        non-snmp nodes and netmon           
                                       performance                         
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
              Tivoli NetView                                               
                Discussions                                                
             <nv-l AT lists.ca DOT ib                                           
  
                  m.com>                                                   
                                                                           
                                                                           






Ahhh...I got it.  Thanks for the response.  I'll probably use the high
value in xnmsnmpconf.
To clarify, if I were to use the (^), would that also prevent config
checks after netmon restarts?

Thanks,
Channing
BB&T


-----Original Message-----
From: nv-l-bounces AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
[mailto:nv-l-bounces AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com] On Behalf Of James Shanks
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 11:06 AM
To: Tivoli NetView Discussions
Subject: Re: [NV-L] Status/Config Polling of non-snmp nodes and netmon
performance

Delay what?  Delay the status polling?  No.  That's a separate issue
from the config check.  The config checks run along side the status
polling and the time they take should not interfere with status polling.
Delay the config check, which happens only once per day by default?
Yes.  But how long a time-out are we talking about? A few seconds per
node?

As I see it, if you have devices which should never be SNMP polled you
have two choices.  You can raise the config check interval just for them
to some really high value (say once a month?) in xnmsnmpconf,  or you
can indicate in the seed file devices which should never be SNMP polled
using a caret
(^) and an address range.  At least that's my understanding.

James Shanks
Level 3 Support  for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows Tivoli Software
/ IBM Software Group




             "Hill, Channing"

             <CHill AT bbandt DOT com

             >
To
             Sent by:                  nv-l AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com

             nv-l-bounces@list
cc
             s.ca.ibm.com


Subject
                                       [NV-L] Status/Config Polling of

             08/02/2006 10:38          non-snmp nodes and netmon

             AM                        performance





             Please respond to

              Tivoli NetView

                Discussions

             <nv-l AT lists.ca DOT ib

                  m.com>












Per previous posts and documentation,  Netview will use ICMP only to
poll NON-SNMP nodes for status. However, will it still try to perform a
configuration check (which is done via SNMP) per snmp.conf's time
intervals for "Configuration Polling Intervals".


I will probably be faced with adding several nodes to be monitored that
will not support SNMP (security reasons). My concern/question is,  would
these non-SNMP nodes cause netmon to slow down waiting on SNMP to time
out when it is restarted and it performs timed configuration checks. If
I understand correctly, netmon will still check nodes for SNMP when it
is restarted and during Configuration polling intervals.


Could someone please advise.


Thanks,
Channing Hill
EMS Analyst II
BB&T
(252) 246-3642 _______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
internal IBM'ers only)




_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
internal IBM'ers only)



_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
internal IBM'ers only)


_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave AT lists.ca.ibm DOT com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to 
internal IBM'ers only)