|
RE: [nv-l] Polling Question
2006-06-06 16:52:22
|
CPUs
on the server are no where near pegged...In fact, they are running at about 3%
and peaking at about 6%.
Is the
Windows platform of Netview multithreaded?
I also
took a sniffer capture of some of the traffic. Netview is polling data
such as interface errors, interface octets, etc. Is there a way to control
which devices are polled for this data?
Paul
with 900 nodes in a local hosts file it is likely you are experiencing high
CPU? You have a dual CPU box, do you have tools that will show how the CPU
usage is on each? If you are total at 50%, could that mean that netmon is
pegged one of the CPUs? In the past I did this on a NetView server on a 4-way.
When I switched from a large hosts file to a caching DNS configuration my
netmon CPU usage went from 100% (of a single CPU) down to 6%.
I suggest
you build a DNS on your Windows machine or one on the same subnet and get rid
of your hosts file. Having DNS co-exist on your NetView server is the
best.
Stephen Hochstetler shochste AT us.ibm DOT com
International
Technical Support Organization at IBM
Office - 512-838-6198 (t/l 678) FAX -
512-838-6931
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [nv-l] Polling Question, Skokan, Paul
- RE: [nv-l] Polling Question, Evans, Bill
- RE: [nv-l] Polling Question, Skokan, Paul
- RE: [nv-l] Polling Question, Skokan, Paul
- RE: [nv-l] Polling Question, Skokan, Paul
- RE: [nv-l] Polling Question,
Skokan, Paul <=
- RE: [nv-l] Polling Question, Skokan, Paul
|
|
|
