|
Re: [nv-l] snmp polled does not give good status?
2005-11-28 04:36:20
I've done
delete device
ovmapcount -a
ovmapcount -b
ovtopofix -A
Nmdemandpoll device and the problem still.
Kind Regards/Cordialement/S pozdravem.
Maxime TRANNOY
IGS - Network Delivery Support Center
Tel : +33 (0) 492 114 767
mailto:mtrannoy AT fr.ibm DOT com
Paul Stroud
<[email protected]
om> To
Maxime
25-11-2005 17:00 TRANNOY/France/Contr/IBM@IBMFR
cc
Subject
Re: [nv-l] snmp polled does not
give good status?
Sounds like maybe the entire device is not being removed as expected.
I would delete the bad objects, stop the map, stop netmon, and run:
ovmapcount -a
ovtopofix -A
then restart the map and see if the devices are discovered properly.
Make sure you have a good back before you attempt this!
Paul
Maxime TRANNOY wrote:
>I try to delete 4
>
>For two it works for the two other one it does not works
>
>For one it works but for an other one it does not work.
>The two that does not work have an IP addres in 172.*.*.* and the twi
which
>works have an address of 192.168.*.* and 172.*.*.*
>
>
>
>Kind Regards/Cordialement/S pozdravem.
>
>Maxime TRANNOY
>IGS - Network Delivery Support Center
>Tel : +33 (0) 492 114 767
>mailto:mtrannoy AT fr.ibm DOT com
>
>
>
>
> Paul Stroud
> <[email protected]
> om> To
> Maxime
> 25-11-2005 15:59 TRANNOY/France/Contr/IBM@IBMFR
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: [nv-l] snmp polled does not
> give good status?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Maxime,
>I would suggest removing and rediscovering this device. Have you tried
>that yet?
>
>Paul
>
>Maxime TRANNOY wrote:
>
>
>
>>HI francois,
>>
>>With the command xnmsnmpconf -resolve <device selection name> I got the
>>wrong community that I set in netview which is wrong as I said in my
first
>>mail.
>>The snmpwalk does not work. I received a time out. It's normal because
the
>>community is wrong.
>>
>>But the nmdemandpoll on this device never time out and the interface is
>>still Up :
>>
>>14:32:34 ***** Starting demand poll of node Device-name *****
>>14:32:34 Interface w.x.y.z (w.x.y.z) (currently up)
>>14:32:34 Current polling parameters
>>14:32:34 scheduled SNMP status check at 11/25/05 14:34:06
>>14:32:34 scheduled configuration check at 11/26/05 14:28:59
>>14:32:34 auto-adjusted polling interval is 900 seconds
>>14:32:34 Verify node name
>>14:32:34 node name verified to be device-name
>>14:32:34 ***** End of demand poll for node Device-name
>>
>>And for me this nmdemandpol is not normal I should receive an SNMP time
>>out.
>>
>>On an other device which is configured with also with a wrong SNMP
>>community I have :
>>
>>15:53:34 ***** Starting demand poll of node Device-name2 *****
>>15:53:34 Interface 192.168.126.1(192.168.126.1) (down since 11/25/05
>>14:23:18)
>>15:53:34 Current polling parameters
>>15:53:34 scheduled SNMP status check at 11/25/05 15:56:54
>>15:53:34 scheduled configuration check at 11/26/05 14:24:01
>>15:53:34 scheduled new node poll at 11/25/05 15:54:36
>>15:53:34 auto-adjusted polling interval is 900 seconds
>>15:53:34 Get system identifier
>>15:53:40 SNMP request timed out (192.168.126.1)
>>15:53:40 Verify node name
>>15:53:40 node name verified to be Device-name2
>>15:53:40 ***** End of demand poll for node Device-name2
>>
>>And this is for me is the normal behaviour of an nmdemandpoll for an snmp
>>polled device with a wrong community.
>>
>>Kind Regards/Cordialement/S pozdravem.
>>
>>Maxime TRANNOY
>>IGS - Network Delivery Support Center
>>Tel : +33 (0) 492 114 767
>>mailto:mtrannoy AT fr.ibm DOT com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> Francois Le Hir
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> <flehir AT ca.ibm DOT co
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> m> To
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> Sent by: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> owner-nv-l@lists. cc
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> us.ibm.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> Subject
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> Re: [nv-l] snmp polled does not
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> 25-11-2005 15:08 give good status?
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> Please respond to
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> nv-l
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Maxime,
>>
>>if you do:
>>xnmsnmpconf -res <device selection name>
>>
>>What do you get ? Is it the correct community string ?
>>
>>when you do:
>>snmpwalk <device selection name> system
>>
>>do you get an answer other than time out ?
>>
>>If the answer is yes to both question it means that Netview has the
>>
>>
>correct
>
>
>>community string.
>>You can also do a quicktest on the device to check that netview is really
>>using snmp for polling and to see what answer it gets.
>>
>>Salutations, / Regards,
>>
>>Francois Le Hir
>>Network Projects & Consulting Services
>>IBM Global Services
>>Phone: (514) 964 2145
>>
>>
>>
>> Maxime TRANNOY
>> <MTRANNOY AT fr DOT ibm.
>> com> To
>> Sent by: <nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com>
>> owner-nv-l@lists. cc
>> us.ibm.com
>> Subject
>> [nv-l] snmp polled does not give
>> 11/25/2005 08:47 good status?
>> AM
>>
>>
>> Please respond to
>> nv-l
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Hello netview 7.1.4 FP2 on AIX.
>>
>>I ask my netview to load devices and to snmp polled them.
>>I put 2 entry in the seed file
>>A.B.C.D
>>$A.B.C.D
>>
>>The devices for the moment is configured with a wrong community but is
>>reachable by ping so could be discovered.
>>
>>But netview instead of showing the device interface Down (because netview
>>could not reach the device with SNMP), Netview shows the device with an
Up
>>interface status.
>>And what is most strange is that when I try to make an nmdemampoll it
>>
>>
>tells
>
>
>>correctly that Netview is polling this device with SNMP but I never
>>received as usual the snmp time out answer which arrives normally when
you
>>nmdemapolled a device with a wrong community.
>>
>>I try to stop and start netmon and the problem still.
>>
>>Is there anyone who has an idear?
>>
>>
>>
>>Kind Regards/Cordialement/S pozdravem.
>>
>>Maxime TRANNOY
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
|
|
