nv-l

[nv-l] ITSA port manage question

2005-11-17 11:47:40
Subject: [nv-l] ITSA port manage question
From: "Kain, Becki \(B.\)" <bkain1 AT ford DOT com>
To: <nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:44:17 -0500
There was a post on July 7th about switch analyzer where the answer was:
poll_all_ports=n 
Use this only if you want to optimize polling - it has no effect on what
ports are being managed. All ports are managed - those not covered by
the passive method will be actively polled - it simply removes the
overlap. 

Is this still the case in 1.3 - that if we enroll a switch, all ports
are managed?  We have a request to have only the uplinks of switch
monitored, not all the unnumbered ports.

Thanks in advance.

Becki Kain



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>