nv-l

RE: [nv-l] % cpu utilization

2005-09-20 03:26:53
Subject: RE: [nv-l] % cpu utilization
From: "praveen kumar" <praveenkumar.nair AT ustri DOT com>
To: <nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 12:57:25 +0530

 

Hi Glen ,

Thanks for your response,

I am able to monitor the memory utilization successfully, so the community string or snmp protocol will not be a problem, I guess.

 

  True regards,

Praveen

 


From: owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com [mailto:owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com] On Behalf Of Glen Warn
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 10:31 PM
To: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] % cpu utilization

 

Am sure the answer here is yes, but I have to ask - can you do a simple demand poll or snmp query?  I have had one problem where I had a $ in my comm string and it only worked with certain queries.  You might try a temp comm string for testing too?  Lastly, have you setup the appropriate snmp parameters on the PIX?  See sample below - be sure your nearest interface to the Netview is specified.  If you have access to the pix, I believe there is a debug SNMP command, if not you could do a debug packet on the interface in question with Netview as the src and your pix interface as the dst.

 

snmp-server host INTERFACE_NAME ip_addr
snmp-server location XXXXXX
snmp-server contact YYYYYY

snmp-server community ZZZZZZZ
snmp-server enable traps

 

Hope this helps,

 

Glen Warn

PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS)

glen.warn AT pemcocorp DOT com

206-628-5770

 

 


From: owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com [mailto:owner-nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com] On Behalf Of praveen kumar
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 3:32 AM
To: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
Subject: [nv-l] % cpu utilization

 

Hi all,

I am running netview 7.1.4  windows-2003

I am successfully monitoring the cpu utilization of all my pix firewall version 6.3 in one of my pix the utilization is showing always zero .I do not know why ,would anyone help me in trouble shooting this problem

 

 True regards,

Praveen

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>